Serious Mother Friggen Question!!!!!!

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
U2democrat said:
excellent. i doubt it can get too much better.

I'd love it in lossless, then I could really blast this thing loud. If it's out there in SHN or FLAC, could someone please point me towards a copy?
 
Axver said:


I'd love it in lossless, then I could really blast this thing loud. If it's out there in SHN or FLAC, could someone please point me towards a copy?

shn, or flac... :drool:

seriously, u2 are one of those bands that nearly require lossless. Lossy algorithms really phase out the high end.

Larry's crisp hi-hats and cymbols and Edge's sparkling, ringing guitar really become embodied on lossless.
 
discothequeLP said:
i converted the 128 kbps mp3's to shn, but i actually dont notice a difference...whats the best quality mp3?

Converting MP3 to SHN will do nothing. You can't get back what is already gone.
 
discothequeLP said:
i converted the 128 kbps mp3's to shn, but i actually dont notice a difference...whats the best quality mp3?

You really can't do that. The point is to start with the lossless. Once it's in 128kps it's lossy, you can't go backwards.
 
discothequeLP said:
i converted the 128 kbps mp3's to shn, but i actually dont notice a difference...whats the best quality mp3?

You won't notice any difference from mp3 to shn. Shn must be encoded from source, because otherwise you are just preserving the lossy audio from the mp3.
 
discothequeLP said:
i converted the 128 kbps mp3's to shn, but i actually dont notice a difference...whats the best quality mp3?

You're not going to recover any quality converting from lossy to lossless.
 
elfyx said:
lol we all post at the same time!

Hah, that we all did. Or at least, the rest of you. I was slow. Blame Crumbs From Your Table starting all over again. Damn I love this song.
 
Back
Top Bottom