spanisheyes
Forum Moderator, The Goal Is Soul
The spectacle known as a U2 tour are legendary, as we all know and have experienced, from the very early days of U2 inception to the present day with the completion of the Elevation tour.
In each instance, U2 has followed the same pattern all of their career. They have went into the studio, released an album, practiced the new songs over the sucession of a few months, as well as the old classics, and then went out to conquer the world in a matter of anywhere from 2 legs (the War tour) to 5 legs (The Unforgettable Fire, as well as could be included the Joshua Tree tour and the ZooTV tour, in their cases calling the last legs other names, and in both cases releasing Rattle and Hum and Zooropa, and in both instances amounting to 5 legs, and as some would argue, broke pattern with these quick releases after what would have normally been the end of a tour).
Do you ever see U2 breaking this pattern, and just go out on tour to simply support their many great collection of songs they currently possess, and maybe even obscure songs they haven't played for awhile, or have never played? Or does U2 need this pattern that has worked for them for so long? Does U2 have within them a need to continue to be relevant in today's market, or to the new fan, that they rest on this formula for that same relevance of recording a new album, and playing it live? If they ever did break pattern, what might the tour look like that would feel in U2's mind it could work?
Chris
In each instance, U2 has followed the same pattern all of their career. They have went into the studio, released an album, practiced the new songs over the sucession of a few months, as well as the old classics, and then went out to conquer the world in a matter of anywhere from 2 legs (the War tour) to 5 legs (The Unforgettable Fire, as well as could be included the Joshua Tree tour and the ZooTV tour, in their cases calling the last legs other names, and in both cases releasing Rattle and Hum and Zooropa, and in both instances amounting to 5 legs, and as some would argue, broke pattern with these quick releases after what would have normally been the end of a tour).
Do you ever see U2 breaking this pattern, and just go out on tour to simply support their many great collection of songs they currently possess, and maybe even obscure songs they haven't played for awhile, or have never played? Or does U2 need this pattern that has worked for them for so long? Does U2 have within them a need to continue to be relevant in today's market, or to the new fan, that they rest on this formula for that same relevance of recording a new album, and playing it live? If they ever did break pattern, what might the tour look like that would feel in U2's mind it could work?
Chris