powerhour24
ONE love, blood, life
Sounds great to me, and with Eno and company on board it would bring in yet another era in their sound, although to really mix it up someone else would be needed, maybe Rick Rubin?
Lancemc said:
While whether or not "In Through the Out Door" is a great album if pretty subjective, I think you're overrating their creativity a bit too much. Yes, III was acoustic, and Houses of the Holy featured some fantastic rhythms and such, but all their albums still carried the same sound to a much greater degree than the other great classic bands. I mean, The Ocean could have been on II, and Dancing Days or Custard Pie could have just as easily been on IV. The Eastern influences were new for them, but once they started appears on more and more of their albums they too became redundant.
As for the synth stuff, that mostly came about in the later albums, which I don't like to even think about. In my opinion, their work after PG is just dreck. Maybe better than most of the boring classic rock bloating the radio today, they just dont' hold up to Zep's incredibly high standard.
Howie B back on board from the POP album.powerhour24 said:Sounds great to me, and with Eno and company on board it would bring in yet another era in their sound, although to really mix it up someone else would be needed, maybe Rick Rubin?
schnumi said:Is there someone here who still has the 18 minutes beach clip?
I can't find it anywhere anymore. Please PM me if you have it!
schnumi said:Howie B back on board from the POP album.
U2Man said:
U2Man said:
vaz02 said:Time to get someone else new in. People complain about wanting something new and fresh and you all want to go back to a AB era with AB producers.
Give me Rubin or give me death.
LemonMelon said:
Howie B > Daniel Lanois
Lancemc said:
*catched breath* Ohhhh wow. THAT is a good one. Had me laughing for 5 minutes.
the tourist said:Let's see if we can get this thread closed. It seems like all the others are getting closed.
bram said:After a decade of experimentalism and pushing outside of their comfort zone, U2 more than earned the right to make a couple of more "straightforward" albums. In fact, anyone who wants something different out of them now and finally gets that from the band will only get it BECAUSE the band already made ATYCLB and HTDAAB. These albums were essential in giving U2 the confidence that they need to continue to pursue new directions in their music. Think if they had made another Pop from a commercial and critical standpoint. Who knows where they'd be now...maybe done. So even if you love Pop (which I do) and even if you're not crazy about the most recent albums, anything U2 does that everyone (if that's even possible) likes in the future was only possible because of those albums. Not to mention the fact that, when you have a catalogue as big as U2's, sometimes you want to be able to pick out their more "conservative" or "easy-listening" phase, you know? I can always find a mood where one of their albums fits perfectly, while the others would not.
Yahweh said:AC/DC prepaired it the same way about 20 times straight and people are still listening to them, in just as many numbers as U2 in most countries.
U2 made 3 very simular albums in the 90s as far as influence goes but nobody seems to complain about that.
Made 3 very simular albums in the 80s....the first 3, nobody complains about those either.....
Honestly I dont think their is much of an arguement here U2 have always worked this way and honestly it doesnt matter unless you are listening to the album every day or every 2 days. U2 have provided us as fans with pretty much the most variety in the music as any band in history has attempted to try yet people still like to complain, guess they wont ever satisfy all of you.
Personally I think if you arent liking the music now you should talk to the producers of these albums, Eno and Lanios, they are the ones that are supposed to push the band into doing something they arent necessarly comfortable with. I also think it has to do a lot with Paul Maguiness wanting U2 to go out with a bang and not fading into obscurity.
I think there will only be 2 more albums from this band, while I will be sad that they call it quits when they do I wont be sad of all the complaining that happens about new material.
This has been going on for as long as I can remember on the Internet even all the way back to the Zooropa days.
This new arguement isnt that new only thing different about it is that U2 is about 15 years older and therefore have a lot more of a mountain to climb when it comes to being a rock band, as the general public thinks anybody over the age of 30 these days is washed up....so U2s age will catch up to them when it comes to selling records and being the worlds biggest rock band if they continue much longer. They will always do well touring wise but album sales wise hard to say how much power they will have.
So yes I think the last 2 albums were a consious effort to make money but I also think that while this material isnt the most innovative stuff they have ever done I would still say the over all quality of it is better then the decade preceding it outside of Achtung Baby.
Headache in a Suitcase said:it would be safe assume that writers/musicians tend to write based upon where they at that point in their life.
the members of u2 are in their 40s, most in long term relationships, with young kids, and just in a different point in their lives than they were in the 80s and 90s... and it's reflected in their music.
what d'ya want from 'em
Headache in a Suitcase said:it would be safe assume that writers/musicians tend to write based upon where they at that point in their life.
the members of u2 are in their 40s, most in long term relationships, with young kids, and just in a different point in their lives than they were in the 80s and 90s... and it's reflected in their music.
what d'ya want from 'em
Bonochick said:
How about people try being nice and respectful towards each other so that threads can stay open?
Headache in a Suitcase said:it would be safe assume that writers/musicians tend to write based upon where they at that point in their life.
the members of u2 are in their 40s, most in long term relationships, with young kids, and just in a different point in their lives than they were in the 80s and 90s... and it's reflected in their music.
what d'ya want from 'em