dan_smee
ONE love, blood, life
That isn't even funny
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you have inside sources or just giving out some logic? Also are you on the side believing album before or around April, or do you believe sometime around June. Thanks.
Source. And I can't comment on what I've recently heard which is not what I wanted to hear, thats for sure. But Im holding on to the (however thin) shred of belief that we'll get the album in April and be lining up to see them play this summer. But...drunk or not..Bono may have been telling it like it really is, after all...
well, it is his band, he should know...
:ban:
Well I wouldn't go that far, but I do believe what he did is against at least the rules of this forum.
Many people do similar stuff on YouTube. They're idiots.
it's all starting to kick off! Here's a round-up..
Invisible and the response - or lack of same - to it is going to be pivotal in what transpires over the next year, is my understatement prediction of the century.
Invisible and the response - or lack of same - to it is going to be pivotal in what transpires over the next year, is my understatement prediction of the century.
I never thought I would ever write the following sentence, but I wish they would do it like Beyonce did. Just put the album out without any announcement and let it roll or get the fuck out.
Oookay. You couch this as a "prediction" but said in your prior post that you have a source, so at minimum you are making this prediction with more information than the rest of us have. I take your prediction to mean it's possible that they would scrap/re-vamp their entire work with Danger Mouse based on Invisible feedback? Maybe even drop him? !
Like always, they will release the album, drop producers, scrap projects etc etc more based on how they personally feel and perceive their confidence in their own work, than anything. But it (big if) Invisible sounds like the album and vice versa...and Invisible doesn't elicit the response that they clearly would hope for...what will that do to their confidence about the rest of the material?
I mean, Invisible surely was not created and does not exist in a vacuum in relation to the new album. We could argue that for a few hundred pages about OL, but Invisible? Uh, no. It's definitely one of the tracks they are/were at least considering to be on the album.
Invisible and the response - or lack of same - to it is going to be pivotal in what transpires over the next year, is my understatement prediction of the century.
Why if it's "only" a song for (RED) and not an indicator of the new U2 sound and the album? That doesn't make much sense to me.
I read a transcript of the U2 press conference after the Globes somewhere yesterday and they were asked if Ordinary Love was an indication of what's to expect from the album, and Bono said "not really". Then Edge jumped in and started talking about "Invisible" and how it would be the first thing we would be hearing (if it's the first thing from the album or not is still open to interpretation).
At the risk of starting a war...the Super Bowl is going to be Den vs NE and Broncos win 20-17. (Made that prediction a little while back and am sticking to it.)