beachball
Refugee
I was the one who mentioned end of the leg, because I was in panic, then hoping he meant have it finished by then, and release it in May.
He's talking about the tour, not the album, so its in the context of The tour is going great, it will continue to go great, because fuck, we'll have a new album out while it's still going i.e., "by the end".
I'm saying that "by the end of the tour" includes May, which is when we're thinking the album is coming out. There's not a huge gap between May and the end of either the US leg (July) or fall 2011. May is not too far off from the end of the tour.
I'm saying that there's no reason to read "it's being pushed back" out of what he said.
He's just saying "by the end of the tour" - that covers a lot of bases, meaning it could come out any time between now and fall 2011 ... but there's no reason, based on that vague quote, to think that it's going to be later than May.
Earnie Shavers knows what's up.He's talking about the tour, not the album, so its in the context of The tour is going great, it will continue to go great, because fuck, between now and the end of the tour, we'll have a new album to add to it.
Or...is he?...Bono isn't cruel enough to keep willingly stringing us along.
I wouldn't bother if I were you...
Here's the deal.
U2 had several dozen songs left over from the Horizon sessions. Most of which were of a meditative character. Kingdom is an example. As is North Star and Breaking Wave. They considered releasing those songs as a low-key, Zooropa-was-to-Achtung-type follow up to Horizon which they would've called Songs of Ascent. Bono's back surgery and subsequent tour cancellation forced them to re-think that plan. Releasing a followup while you're on tour makes sense; releasing a followup while your singer is laid up in bed does not. Arguing further against its release was the disappointing performance of Horizon.
Faced with some unexpected time on their hands, they wrote several rock and roll songs to go along with a song called Glastonbury, which they'd written specifically to debut as a stand-alone single at their now-cancelled appearance at the Glastonbury Festival. And, as they so often do, they also followed a thread of music at this time that is more in line with what they are currently listening to. This is a more club-sounding group of songs. The Return of the Stingray Guitar is an example.
For a time, they thought that each group of songs represented a different direction, requiring a separate release. However, in part upon the advice of Chris Martin, who suggested they immediately release the best of everything they had, and in part because the songs from Horizon (now over 2 years old) probably could no longer sustain them in America, they decided that it made more sense to launch the American tour with the excitement and energy of a new major release. So they're combining the more rock-oriented songs with the best songs from Ascent into a more traditional U2 album to be released just days before their tour kicks off in Denver. This album is being produced by Danger Mouse (listen to Broken Bells) and will include Glastonbury, Stingray and more conventionally structured versions of the songs from SOA. Its release will be supported with all hype, promotion and fanfare of a major U2 release. I don't know what it will be called. Probably not Songs of Ascent.
They will revisit the rest of the club songs with Will.i.am after the tour. It may be released as a quick, Zooropa-like follow up; it may be their always-delayed next major release; it may never materialize at all. My hunch is that the club sounding songs will be combined with yet-to-be-written songs and be released as a "club-ISH" sounding album in the fall of 2012.
I know I wrote this as if I have inside information. I don't. This is just my take.
I think a lot of us were giving opinions on exactly what you're talking about over the past couple pages. We've gone back and forth between whether we think the DM album contains reworked or entirely new material, whether SOA or the club album will ever see the light of day, etc. In the end, we're all forming our opinion on very minute threads of information from the band and those close to them, we really won't know until they start talking.
I gotta say though, if they were playing Mercy to shut us up/appease us, they wouldn't have changed it so much! Clearly we haven't shut up about it yet!
when did u2 ever say that songs of ascent was a completed, finished album?
how to dismantle an atomic bomb was incredibly close to being finished with chris thomas. we know how that ended up. why is the alleged songs of ascent any different?
You're assuming Songs of Ascent is a complete, finished album. That they nailed down 10 or so tracks, finished them to a satisfactory point, said "Right, this is Songs of Ascent. It will always be Songs of Ascent. It is finished, and it is good." and then they just decided to put it up on a shelf for some other day. I don't think that would be the case, in several ways.
But, regardless, even if something similar to that were the case, I still don't think anything would be off limits. Take all the tracks (the 'album') and rework them all with another producer just for shits and giggles? No. But if there was something from then that they really loved or thought really fit with what they were doing now, or something from then they thought could work with something new, I don't think anyone would be going "Woah, hold on, we started that with Brian and Danny... it would be a bit rude to look at it again, certainly would be to change it, don't you think? Put that chorus down Bono! I'm talking to you..."
So of course a Danger Mouse produced album could end up with nothing that originated from the No Line leftover/Songs of Ascent material. Or it could be littered with links to that material, large and small. Or whole songs from then could have been given another look, perhaps continually returned to in the time in between. You might actually never know. Probably won't ever know. But my bet is some of it carries over, and has continually carried over through each fresh session and look since then.
This does make sense for sure.
What I am curious to know is what will become of North Star, Every Breaking Wave, Glastonbury, Mercy, Stingray and (??????)Boy Falls(??????)...do we even include Boy Falls?
What happens?
-Do we think they were road tested this year by U2 only to be shelved in favor of things they became so interested in during the European tour? There was a lot of talk about how they had jetted off between gigs and recorded entirely new songs with an eye toward Danger Mouse producing them.
-Or will these songs be re worked and made a substantial part of the next U2 album, probably produced by Danger Mouse and hopefully released in May 2011?
Not trying to hijack this thread, people can and should discuss whatever the hell they want.
However, there has been so much baseless speculation and false choices presented(commercial or quality, new direction or keep the chimes, etc) and remarkably little discussion of what we think will happen to songs that have actually been road tested.
I would really love to see as many opinions as possible on what I put in bold.
This is a major question and really could be argued very convincingly and ultimately go either way when the final product is done!
I personally think that there is more evidence suggesting the 1st possibility, but there is still a huge question to be answered: why the hell did they road test these songs, then?
That question becomes a bit smaller in my mind when I consider that North Star, Mercy and EBW at a minimum were leftovers that maybe they were just interested in getting out to their fans and gaging how certain types of songs go down.
Mercy was, in all likelihood, done simply to shut people like us up
Aren't we all assuming ?
Yes, that is my understanding: they had SOA very close - if not - to done, and then Bono's back (and to a smaller degree the cold reception NLOTH got) got in the way. They might have gone on with SOA but Lanois had that motorcycle crash and is now busy touring his band, Eno's busy with Coldplay and Lillywhite is busy with Beady Eye.
My bet is DM has picked up the rock oriented songs - new songs like Glastonbury, possibly Mercy, the Spiderman song ... along with possibly the best of Rubin leftovers and they are pushing ahead with the "rock" album. Has more potential live, and can still include that song they're looking for that will connect to the masses. (Spiderman song ? Mercy ?) Will it include a song originally meant for SOA ? Sure, very likely. But is the DM stuff simply SOA taken over or a mash up of SOA and the rock stuff ? I don't buy that.
Yes, that is my understanding: they had SOA very close - if not - to done, and then Bono's back (and to a smaller degree the cold reception NLOTH got) got in the way.
They were talking about releasing it as a quick follow up to NLOTH...that doesn't sound finished enough ? But a back injury of your singer does not sound like a good time to release a new record...
Yes, we know. Half of the band said no to the Chris Thomas recordings. No such thing ever happened to SOA.
U2 never said SOA was cancelled.
2 albums are in the works for release in 2011... one is the fan club cd : Duals, with re-recordings of Grace, Scarlet, All I Want Is You, etc. ,second is The Best Of 2000-2010, with obvious tracks being performed and worked out on the 360 Tour like Mercy, Every Breaking Wave, North Star, Glastonbury, etc.
Don't look for a new studio album until this tour has finished completely , .....
pure speculation of course
Usually speculation is based on SOMETHING, you're basing yours on internet rumours that have been proven false.
I wake up sometimes wondering what's going on at Interference, so I log in to check it out, add my own opinion about something, and almost always get this negative vibe from here, anyway, no one knows anything, it's all rumors
back into my box now, thanks BVS