womanfish said:
You are either misinformed or not able to understand what i'm saying.
Or I'm giving you a hard time...
womanfish said:
First - I also have vertigo on 2 of my computers. I got it from iTunes. if I wanted to, i could put this on other computers, burn cd's or download to my iPod. Everyone knows this. BUT if the song comes already on an iPod - I REPEAT - ALREADY ON AN IPOD, like the album would be with the new U2 version iPod, then it would be stuck on there and not able to be uploaded to iTunes. Like I said, it CAN be done, but the everyday Joe is not going to do this.
I'm simply saying Apple isn't going to make a special case for U2. If the songs are preinstalled on your iPod, you own them (or at least the rights to listen to them) so when the iPod syncs to your Mac or PC, it's going to look at the Music store and confirm, then copy them to your hard drive.
womanfish said:
Second - AAC is NOT LOSSLESS and it uses the virtually the same perceptual coding that mp3's do. Some argue that they sound slightly better, but you're still cutting out almost 90% of the audio data to compress the file much like an MP3.
Yes, I'm mixing the all the AAAA's... Apple's Lossless is "lossless"... no difference... AAC in the format you are describing is lossy.
womanfish said:
It is not CD quality. The main point with AAC is to get better quality with lower bitrate than Mp3 (ie. a 64bit AAC sounds similar to a 128bit mp3) which is nice and useful for storage and saving bandwidth, but they both are inferior to CD.
Yes, I agree.
womanfish said:
Yes you can get lossless from iTunes, with Apple Lossless (not AAC Lossless). I just stated that they haven't said if this is the format they will use or not with the U2 songs on the iPod. I would think fans would want the quality of a CD that they can then choose to put on computer, iPod, etc... than to get a special iPod that will limit their possibilities of what they can do with the new songs and be of inferior quality.
Now I'm understanding what you are saying. But no, Apple won't put Lossless U2 files on the iPod, they will be protected AAC, just like everything else.
womanfish said:
Other than that, why in the hell do you want to go to the trouble to print out a booklet on your computer? So when all is said and done you'll have spent more money and time on an inferior product than if you just went to the damn store.
Yeah, but the entire point is to get rid of all the brick and mortar stores. They just aren't going to be around in 10 years, at least selling "cds". They'll morph into coffee shops, but the days of selling a physical "cd" are pretty much over.
Get 100Mps to house and you'll see the U2 videos bundled with the songs.
Want to see what 1 million songs looks like today?
apple.com/xserve/raid/
In ten years that will be in your pocket for $399. The entire recording industry in your pocket... think about it... why would anyone still be using CD's at that point???
Apple is going to blast the world with hardcore change. They did it to businesses in the early 80's with the spreadsheet, the middle 80's they eliminated entire printing companies with the Laser printer, steve's NeXT box brought us the world wide web in the early 90's, (what you are viewing right now) and it's going to totally alter the recording and video industries next. Tomorrow's U2 announcement is the shape of things to come... faster and faster...
iTunes is only Audio...
Take a look at Apple's QuickTime Page
for a look at...
"iMovies" in the years ahead.
womanfish said:
And even though you're such a technical genius, it doesn't occur to you that even with protected AAC's that the song can be copied by being played through outboard recording gear and bounced back down to an Mp3 to be put out for the general public. (My roomate also got Vertigo off Limewire by the way). And the downoading market for a single that is readily available on the radio is much different than the security for an entire album that is being strategically released on a huge pre-holiday sales week. It means millions and millions of dollars.
Yes, and I said that's easy to do with a little software program called HiJack... no fancy wires or gear... it's pure software, messing with cables is a waste of time...
Who cares about the money... U2 certainly shouldn't, Apple certainly doesn't... It's not in the DNA of either "company". Just listen to music, be happy...
womanfish said:
You may think that the "charts" are old-fashioned but it is still the heart and soul of what drives continued sales and airplay. you seem to think that the download chart is important, so why not the sales chart? Some people still enjoy leaving their home once and a while. Fresh air and all...
That's all well and good, but that's an era that's officially over. Airplay? Doesn't matter... download rate is where the action is, and will be for the foreseeable future. Whatever band gets the most bits transmitted wins.
Personally, I get outside plenty and take my 4500 songs on my 12" COLOR iPod with me. I can stream to any stereo with my Airport Express so I'm good go anywhere in the world on a moments notice. I sold all my CDs years ago and will never go back. For the times, they are a changing. And even more quickly in 10 hours!
My fingers are crossed for a full album / itunes only release....
AEE