MrBrau1 said:OMG- All the newbies don't "get" Passengers.
U2DMfan said:Interesting how the forum has already moved on from that supposed "third masterpeice".
Earnie Shavers said:while the HTDAAB songs were geneticaly engineered to be something specific.
MrBrau1 said:
For a second I thought you were describing Pop.
Earnie Shavers said:HTDAAB is like a Toyota Camry: of a perfect quality, ridiculously reliable, does everything you need, yet it's generic, bland, will never stand out on the highway as something special. Pop is like that car Homer Simpson designed: absolutely everything you want is in there, but many find the finished combined product at best impractical, at worst ugly and even it's biggest fans admit it has flaws.
Earnie Shavers said:
ONE Rolling Stone review called it that. I personally place it higher than HTDAAB because, even in it's lowest points, it feels fresher and more natural than HTDAAB. More like those songs had a natural creation and birth, while the HTDAAB songs were geneticaly engineered to be something specific. And if U2 want to do easily accessible, commercially geared pop, Beautiful Day is perfect and above and beyond any and all attempts on The Bomb. Listen to Beautiful Day and Vertigo back to back. Beautiful Day makes me feel like as the song is supposed to. Vertigo makes me feel like as something so genericaly blueprint built always will.
U2DMfan said:
I can agree with what you said.
I feel like ATYCLB was pretty natural, I just didn't really dig the songs. I feel like it had 4 great songs and some filler.
I feel like HTDAAB has much less filler, but is much less natural, which is where we agree. I feel like it's very much the 'cousin' of POP in that sense. It did feel engineered.
Difference being, POP had some really outstanding songs on it and it's peaks are so much higher than anything on HTDAAB, that is where the comparison stops. Discotheque may err in 36 different ways, but in the ways it hits, it nails it. Vertigo may err in 27 different ways and doesn't make up for it. That's pretty convuluted for someone as articulate as you, but I can't paint the picture any better w/o typing on and on for hundreds of words.
If it's hit and miss, better hit more often than not.
I'd also say I think while ATYCLB peaks early and turns into a snoozefest, HTDAAB remains what it is throughout, good or bad. I still rank HTDAAB higher because, as an album it doesn't totally drop off the fucking map before it's half over. HTDAAB was just overcooked, and it's about the only way I have found to describe it. Had they took an extra 6 months, or a year on Achtung Baby or The Joshua Tree, maybe they would have ruined them as well.
Basically, you'll find a constant thread in my criticisim of the last three albums, they are taking too long in the studio, being far too calculated and dumbing themselves down. In a nutshell.
More miss than hit. I can deal with miss, I deal with Babyface.
Earnie Shavers said:
HTDAAB is like a Toyota Camry: of a perfect quality, ridiculously reliable, does everything you need, yet it's generic, bland, will never stand out on the highway as something special. Pop is like that car Homer Simpson designed: absolutely everything you want is in there, but many find the finished combined product at best impractical, at worst ugly and even it's biggest fans admit it has flaws.
MrBrau1 said:I don't know if studio time has as much impact as you think. HTDAAB was essentially recorded in 6 months. The problem is, they write as they record.