Just no “atm machine” and no “force quit and move to trash” and I’m good.
And no more "I Gotta Submarine and You Gotta Gasoline....." Talk about cringeworthy...
Just no “atm machine” and no “force quit and move to trash” and I’m good.
You said you disagreed with my assessment that the last two albums were compromised by their chase of relevance, and then proceeded to point out all of the things they did on the last two albums that were done in pursuit of relevance
I never said the entire albums were bad - I said they were compromised by bad decisions that were made on the interest of trying to stay hip and cool with the kids.
Innocence also bailed on an all Danger Mouse produced album to bring in Ryan Tedder - which is a move that screams of desperation.LOL. yeah, i get your point. To me i'm thinking more musically, SOI was not in pursuit of pop relevance. SOE, somewhat, But yes, their decisions regarding first singles, release method, etc... definitely have been. Solid albums musically, marred by bad decisions publicly.
I just think the No Line was ALL of that. Horrible first single choice. and a batch of horrible, looking for chart, pop duds that sunk the whole damn thing.
Innocence also bailed on an all Danger Mouse produced album to bring in Ryan Tedder - which is a move that screams of desperation.
Ryan Tedder's involvement with the band needs to die a horrible first death.
HTDAAB is the post-Pop album I tolerate the most, but the band's recent attempts to rawk do not bode well.
But really I don't care whether they decide to go borderline metal or softer than UF b-sides, I just want a coherent vision without a billion cooks spoiling the broth. I suspect that no matter what style or approach the band choose, I will enjoy it much more than I have enjoyed the last three albums if it is simply focused and not over-thought or over-produced.
Well all we heard was edge and Bono live. We never heard what it sounded like when produced by Burton.Agreed. Although, i must say that IMO Every Breaking Wave was much improved. Their live performances of it prior were a meandering mess in comparison.
But he needs to GO. Would love to see a strictly Danger Mouse, Barlow and Thomas produced album. How Eno, Lanois and Lillywhite allowed the final product of No Line is mind boggling.
LOL. yeah, i get your point. To me i'm thinking more musically, SOI was not in pursuit of pop relevance. SOE, somewhat, But yes, their decisions regarding first singles, release method, etc... definitely have been. Solid albums musically, marred by bad decisions publicly.
I just think the No Line was ALL of that. Horrible first single choice. and a batch of horrible, looking for chart, pop duds that sunk the whole damn thing.
Well all we heard was edge and Bono live. We never heard what it sounded like when produced by Burton.
MOS is the album saying “let’s just cuddle for awhile”. By that point, it’s all over.
to my ears MOS is an overwrought mess. Trying way to hard to be something epic. And not helped by B's horrible screeching.
and when you say 'by that point'.... MOS is track 3. You think the album is done at that point, when you just said you loved MOS? or am I misreading your comment?
As an album, it really just Peters out and never gets going.
If they weren't willing to give Danger Mouse the respect to stick with him, you think they're going to do the same for Andy Barlow?
Don't get your hopes up.
Did Edge really say that?Obviously things will change a million times over by the time the album, if the album comes out.
Hearing Edge say that he wants a guitar based album because you don't hear guitars on the radio anymore basically means they haven't learnt anything. Leave the charts alone. They've tried three times now to get that "hit" and have failed. SOE did have a few songs perform decent, and I think that's the best they can really do without having another gimmick.
Get rid of Teder. He may have a ear for a hook, but it doesn't fit with how U2 perform as a band. U2 hooks were always fairly different than the other pop acts at the time.
I'd be content with one more album. Lock the band in the studio TOGETHER for a year. No more Edge is Malibu sending files to Barlow, who then forwards on to Bono to sing into his phone while in Africa, to send a file to Teder who sends the file back to Barlow who pulls up a recording of Larry and Adam playing from 2005.
Get Brian, Danny, and Flood. Record the music, make 3 billion demos of one song.....just don't bring in someone else to fuck around with it.
If the album turns out to be all RAWK, then so be it. But I think with those three producing, you'd get everyone out of their comfort zone and without the chasing of LOTS OF HITS, maybe they can end this journey with something magical.
Hearing Edge say that he wants a guitar based album because you don't hear guitars on the radio anymore . . .
I can't get behind bashing NLOTH for having a handful of chart chasers when it's the last album of theirs with a majority of songs that didn't sound like they came from a U2 blueprint before being sterilized in a vat of bleach. If SOE had tracks like Moment of Surrender, Fez-Being Born and Cedars of Lebanon, I wouldn't be so hard on it.
Did Edge really say that?
That's horrible. Fuck the radio.
i mean, it wouldn't be that bad if there was any evidence whatsoever pointing to edge still being able to write a creative, semi-interesting guitar part these days.
U2 turning more guitar heavy is something I would welcome.i mean, it wouldn't be that bad if there was any evidence whatsoever pointing to edge still being able to write a creative, semi-interesting guitar part these days.
U2 turning more guitar heavy is something I would welcome.
It's U2 continuing to care about what is or isn't on the radio and using that as their jumping off point that bothers me.
Hearing Edge say that he wants a guitar based album because you don't hear guitars on the radio anymore basically means they haven't learnt anything. Leave the charts alone.
You don't hear U2 on the radio much anymore either.
I'd go further: you don't hear the radio much any more.