Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
Hopefully, he’ll have the good sense to ask Fisher to co-author.
Last edited:
That's it! Thank you!
You’re welcome!
I finally got around to watching the latest subscriber video on U2.com and Bono says in it that he would like the next album to be a “balls-to-the-wall rock album.” So there’s a tidbit to get us through the next three years.
You’re welcome!
I finally got around to watching the latest subscriber video on U2.com and Bono says in it that he would like the next album to be a “balls-to-the-wall rock album.” So there’s a tidbit to get us through the next three years.
No publisher is going to pay big bucks for a memoir that glosses over the pivital moments in his life.
Fuck, you guys. I'm actually thinking about dropping $50 on U2.com just so I don't have to rely on others uploading the live double album tracks.
In seriousness I do take your points. Yes, we'd get more detail, further insights, and new perspectives. There are more than enough diehard fans who'd love it, of course, and people who haven't spent the last however many years living and breathing this band will find out much they don't know.
2 things!
1- thanks for reminding me to renew
2-for what it’s worth, the subscription is “only” $40 this year
So 12-13 variations of Song For Someone
Seriously. And didn't they already do their "balls to the wall" rock album with Bomb? I hate that album, so really loathing this latest news. Look, these guys need to own what they are. Maybe I expect too much. Earlier in the thread we discussed the MDH tracks. I forgot the ones they put out (except Stateless and TGBHF), but listened to "Never Let Me Go" again. The missing ingredient that those songs had tat te recent stuff doesn't is confidence. And guts. They were doing some odd stuff, but it worked. I love it when this band keeps us guessing but gives hints of the familiar, avoiding the impression they let off the gas to have appeal. I fear that with this direction.
I would much rather hear an album where they just focus on creativity and whether that produces harder rock songs or more gentle atmospheric stuff, so be it. Just don't like the idea of picking a model of song first and then restricting their writing into that framework.
Hard Rock from Uranus
I wouldn't allow it to be a much of a conern.
They'll change their collective mind a dozen or so times before the next album is finalized anyway.
Painful
Hard Rock from Uranus
Painful
Songs of IncontinenceSongs of ExLax?
They'll change their collective mind a dozen or so times before the next album is finalized anyway.
But really I don't care whether they decide to go borderline metal or softer than UF b-sides, I just want a coherent vision without a billion cooks spoiling the broth. I suspect that no matter what style or approach the band choose, I will enjoy it much more than I have enjoyed the last three albums if it is simply focused and not over-thought or over-produced.
We're still fighting, but this times a million.
At this point in their careers I don't need the second coming of Joshua Tree. I don't need them to be atmospheric, experimental, chimey guitars or industrial crunch. I just want them to stick with a coherent theme and not dilute it in the name of chasing pop chart relevance.
Each of the last three albums suffered because they couldn't just see the vision out because they felt they needed a radio hit.
You said you disagreed with my assessment that the last two albums were compromised by their chase of relevance, and then proceeded to point out all of the things they did on the last two albums that were done in pursuit of relevanceWhile I agree with the first part of this statement for the most part, when i take a real look back, I think No Line is really the only album I can say was fucked up by chasing chart relevance.
Look at SOI. That album is just solid. I don't really like Song for Someone, and would have much rather had the brilliant Crystal Ballroom take its place.
But what destroyed that album was the Apple debacle, and the choice of first single.
I've said it before, but if Every Breaking Wave was the first single, and they had just put a little pop up on everyones iphone that asked if they wanted to accept or decline the U2 album for free on their phones, I think the band would be in a very different place.
Miracle would have been a decent album cut. Raised by Wolves, Sleep like a baby, Iris, Cedarwood Rd, the Troubles!!, Reach..., even Californian, None of these are chasing chart success in my eyes. Just solid tunes that got completely shit on because of the release.
I see it more on SOE, American Soul and Get Out should not have made the cut, and the fact that they were showcased as singles is just such a terrible decision.
Best thing, while poppy, was a strong song and actually holds up well for me and not a bad first single choice. Would have been cool if they went with Summer of Love or Red Flag first, or even as follow up singles.
I am hoping for just solid material that is cohesive and strong throughout. I think the last two albums were close, with SOI being the high mark in that respect. They have it in them, but need people around them to guide them in their decisions, especially on first single choices, and to shed off the both the bland (Get Out) and the lame rawk (American Soul)