purpleoscar
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
Whether it's midtempo or not..
the quality has to be extremely high to pull it off.
the quality has to be extremely high to pull it off.
There will always be a mid-tempo track in a U2 album, whether you like it or not.agreed...mid-tempo rock won't cut it for me for this album
I don't want Crumbs, Miracle Drug, Magnificent...etc
Me too.I'll be happy if we get a single that's supposed to be "anthemic", "epic".
There will always be a mid-tempo track in a U2 album, whether you like it or not.
I think the the reported sound of Siren was "frantic" and "punky" according to the people on the beach...
Invisible was the first "premiere" of a U2 song that just left me feeling flat, disappointed, and almost a little mad.
There will always be a mid-tempo track in a U2 album, whether you like it or not.
This place gives me whiplash.
I think the the reported sound of Siren was "frantic" and "punky" according to the people on the beach...
Punk rock on Venus punky?
This place gives me whiplash.
now if they did a cover of Metallica's "Whiplash", i'd be highly impressed.
With all the volcanos and Iceland references going on (and there's a volcano erupting in Iceland right now), maybe the mysterious female voice on Song for Someone belongs to Björk? Now how cool would that be?
.It took a little getting used to
now if they did a cover of Metallica's "Whiplash", i'd be highly impressed.
Ha. Happy Sullen Jr.'s back would explode trying to keep that pace.
Yeah, Bjork's drive for mainstream attention is not nearly slavish enough to be appreciated by the likes of U2.
Blows my mind, personally. Seems to me the guys who actually wrote the song felt she had a really really good idea of what the song was/is about. They thought she was perfect for it, and she was.
.
This here makes me a bit uneasy...as if the material is not THAT good in general or way out of what U2 would sound like...
used to have a member who claimed in seriousness to have invented the retractable roof stadium.
If you don't like it, hey, that's fine. Everyone is entitled to their likes and dislikes.
But to say that she "sounds like she doesn't even know what the song is about" is one of the most asinine comments I've ever read on these boards, and this is a place that used to have a member who claimed in seriousness to have invented the retractable roof stadium.
I really really want to know how the fuck one came to that conclusion, for the statement has blown my fucking mind.
.
This here makes me a bit uneasy...as if the material is not THAT good in general or way out of what U2 would sound like...
used to?
that's the best part. I don't want something too familiar. I want even some disappointment from typical fans. Everybody has an idea of what they should sound like but they should be forced to listen to the music as it is. I like how they wanted zoo station to sound like there was something wrong with the cd player for u2 fans who expected more a joshua tree style.
If you don't like it, hey, that's fine. Everyone is entitled to their likes and dislikes.
But to say that she "sounds like she doesn't even know what the song is about" is one of the most asinine comments I've ever read on these boards, and this is a place that used to have a member who claimed in seriousness to have invented the retractable roof stadium.
I really really want to know how the fuck one came to that conclusion, for the statement has blown my fucking mind.