Layton said:
Ok, what's this thread about again? Oh yeah, HTDAAB pt 2. I don't like part 2's, in general. So I'd say no. My feeling is that it's time for U2 to loosen up their song structures. They've done enough emphasizing of conventional song structures that they're on the verge of sounding too rigid as a band.
I agree with that, I think. I don't expect a radical change next album, but I'm expecting some either more hard, raw, guitar-driven work (think alt. ABOY, Xanax, LAPOE...) or more free-flowing, ethereal stuff (like Mercy
). perhaps some combination of both.
I don't know why so many people think U2 have lost their way and that there's some division between 1980-1999 U2 and 00's U2. ATYCLB was a shift in direction just as much as Achtung or (to a certain degree) UF
Would you all
really have wanetd U2 to continue in the industrial/experimental direction and possibly fade out? I suppose the answer is yes. Personally I'm glad U2 shifted gears, and anyone who has seen me post knows my favourite album
I just like seeing U2 on the top of the world, is that such a bad thing? I'm not saying I'd want them to compromise what they wanted just to be popular,
fuck no. But I don't think they've done that. U2 has, for the most part, been happy with what they've released over the last few years, and I agree with Bono when he says HTDAAB is their best
collection of songs to date. But I also agree with him in that the whole isn't greater than the sum of the parts which leads me to believe that the next U2 album will be just that - an album, not a bunch of sort of similar songs on the same CD. I'm very much looking forward to that.