xaviMF22
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
MrBrau1 said:2 years later HTDAAB is the worst U2 album.
MrBrau1 said:2 years later HTDAAB is the worst U2 album.
xaviMF22 said:
Bonochick said:
altering other members quotes is unacceptable.
MrBrau1 said:yeah, but you're a Radiohead fan. Which means you could find something musical in the large fart I'll lay 10 minutes after eating steak/potatos/green beans for dinner tonite.
Marko said:
you may have a point here...
but I'm sad that it still means that they are mediocre
Marko said:
yeah...it's fun...
no one can change any one's mind so we are driving in circle...all the same posts from the same people (including me)..
we feel safe here
purpleoscar said:
Miracle Drug:
It's also a song that sounds like what Depeche Mode wish they could sound like now.
carrotflowers said:
who mentioned their tour? I agree, U2 are an amazing live act because they have such a strong back catalogue and one of the greatest performer/singer of the past 30 years but that doesn't give them a licence to release sub-par studio albums does it. Don't believe the hype, only believe what you know to be true and in this case, the truth is as follows - U2 have one of the best live acts around and probably are the greatest band in history (yes I am a massive fan believe it or not) but their last album was pretty much garbage. End of story.
MrBrau1 said:2 years later HTDAAB is the 3rd best U2 album.
LuvandPeace1980 said:
About the same for me too.. although if boy was remastered I might have a change in the rankings
ozeeko said:
Remastered or not, BOY's dated production will always crush The Bomb's "shitty, in-your-face, overloaded with crap, with some extra crap on the side" style.
LuvandPeace1980 said:
Yeah just like your shitty in your face post
I was not comparing the two
I was simply making a comment about Boy.. as it's slowly creeping up. We all know it's old.. if it was made 10 years ago it would easily have been my favourite album.
ozeeko said:
What difference does it make if BOY was made 10 years ago or 20? You either like something or you don't.
ozeeko said:Does sound quality come first before the actual songs tho? Cuz I heard Justin Timberlake's new album...and I must say I was blown away.
LuvandPeace1980 said:
The songs on Boy are brilliant.. but I hear Electic Co. on the CD and I think it could have been better in both quality and output from the band.
It's a song which they have grown into a monster.. it's still brilliant on the CD however the cd quality which can be forgiven for the time is not ideal for me.
If I had to make choices about what was the best album, production quality comes into.
The songs on HTDAAB are brilliant and so is the production. Thats why it's number 3 for me.
ozeeko said:
I guess we just look at music differently. Me, I'm all about songwriting and album flow, musicianship and originality. The audio production comes into play later after all those other factors have been taken into consideration. As I've said b4, I think ATYCLB's production is way superior to WAR, yet I prefer the latter cuz of the music. 'Na mean??
ozeeko said:
Remastered or not, BOY's dated production will always crush The Bomb's "shitty, in-your-face, overloaded with crap, with some extra crap on the side" style.
carrotflowers said:I don't know how you can sit back and listen to this album and feel provoked in anyway about the tragedies going on in the world today. I don't know how you can listen to it without feeling cheap because let's face it, you are accepting average material from a band you have spent probably about 400 to 500 dollars on in the past. They are treating their fans like fools when they release crap like this, they basically think they're are so good and their fan-base is so loyal that they can release anything and we'll all swallow it. I refuse to swallow it, I don't care what the hell Bono is doing for the world, if it's so great then leave U2 and become a politician. Don't release sub-par material and pretend you're so sincere about the whole thing. Mediocrity is terrible when it's marketed as sincerity.
Bono does a lot for the world and that is great, but U2 no longer speak to this generation. I don't go to a concert and think 'yeah!, let's save the world with Bono!' I think 'Yeah, play some of your old stuff when you actually gave a toss about what you sounded like!'.
Bono fails to realise that the only reason he is in a position of power is because U2 were so great, now he is selling himself and his fans short. The more MOR and safe their music becomes, the more of a joke Bono becomes. Wether that's right or wrong it's true and it's just how the public work. Once the band goes down, everyone in the band goes down with it and any campaign or fight is damaged beyond recovery because it has been shrouded in a cloak of mediocrity and ageing rock stars still clutching at former glory which has long since left them.
Yahweh said:Get all your frustrations out folks....and as a side note Depeche Modes 2 latest albums have been some of the worst output from a otherwise great band.