War of the Worlds - Page 3

Chizip · 06-30-2005, 11:58 AM

those people should sign my petition

deep · 06-30-2005, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WildHoneyAlways
Here's an petition for people boycotting the movie b/c of Tom Cruise.
http://www.petitiononline.com/Tomkat/petition.html

I have no desire to see this movie.

nothing succeeds

like bigotry and hate

nbcrusader · 06-30-2005, 03:17 PM

Or simply free speech

WildHoneyAlways · 06-30-2005, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by deep

nothing succeeds

like bigotry and hate

Are you referring to Mr. Cruise or the petition?

deep · 06-30-2005, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chizip
how the hell did they get so many signatures

Quote:

-We do not want to watch his ‘out of control’ yet suspiciously manipulative antics nor listen to his condescending, holier-than-thou judgments. This man cannot even articulate a coherent sentence. He should stick to reading movie scripts.

It is revealing that the most compelling character Tom Cruise has ever portrayed is “Frank TJ Mackay” from Magnolia, a control-freak with a pathological need to assert his obsession over not just those around him, but the public as well, by exploiting his access to public media. Apparently Mr. Cruise was playing himself.

Aardvark747 · 07-01-2005, 02:51 AM

Saw this yesterday, and as a HUGE TC fan, I can only say this.....Awful.

So predictable...so dull. I expected so much more from TC and SS especially. Maybe I just love Jeff Wayne's musical version too much to be able to enjoy any other version of this story.

5/10

briarrose · 07-01-2005, 04:57 AM

I didn't like this movie either. I was really into for about the first 45 minutes, but then it just went downhill. I didn't like the end at all. It was too abrupt. I couldn't believe this was a Steven Spielberg movie.

MrsSpringsteen · 07-01-2005, 04:59 AM

I'd give it 2 or 2 1/2 stars. Very impressive technical achievement, but it's just not what I've come to expect from Steven Spielberg. To me he is a storyteller w/ that rare quality of subtlety, and this has no subtlety whatsoever-and very little story.

Dakota Fanning is one fine actress, and I thought Tom did a decent job.

One thing I have to say-this movie is NOT appropriate for kids. There were two kids in front of me who looked about 7 or 8..they were terrified and the parents eventually left. It took them long enough. I don't understand why people don't read up on the content of these movies. It should be rated R.

People had strange reactions to it-the scene where Dakota goes to the river and sees what she sees, people were laughing

Maybe it's that situation where people laugh because they're so unnerved and uncomfortable.

PhunkPhorce · 07-01-2005, 05:08 AM

I haven't seen War of the Worlds yet, but have a question about Spielberg. I think his greatest achievemnts were Jaws and Indiana Jones trilogy. After that (meaning since 1989) all his movies are just OK at best. "A.I." is an exception, but mostly thanks to Stanley Kubrick's "spirit".

What do you think?

MrsSpringsteen · 07-01-2005, 05:20 AM

what about Schindler's List?

U2Girl1978 · 07-01-2005, 05:37 AM

I think TC exerted some sort of control over the movie and SS to be honest. Do you think I'm wrong?

MrsSpringsteen · 07-01-2005, 05:41 AM

Tom was one of the producers on the movie so I suppose he controlled it to some extent

PhunkPhorce · 07-01-2005, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
what about Schindler's List?

well... I can imagine how it came out as some kind of revelation for a lot of people. With all those terrors of WW2 portrayed quite realistically.

Why there was nothing new for me in this movie is mostly because we have a lot of great movies, documentaries and books about WW2 here in Russia. So the topics of henocide, mass killings, tortures and all those terrible things which goes along with nazis are very well covered in our mass-media.

As for the rest of the movie components: story is based on the Thomas Keneally's book and you simply can't lose with Liam Neeson, Ben Kingsley and Ralph Fiennes so not much left to give Mr. Spielberg a credit for.

Oh, and the little girl in the red dress definetely belongs to "Titanic"

MrsSpringsteen · 07-01-2005, 06:56 AM

Paramount's highly anticipated "War of the Worlds" invaded 3,908 theaters Wednesday and grossed $21.3 million on its opening day in North America. Day 1 for "War," directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Cruise, proved to be the distributor's best opening day ever and the seventh-biggest Wednesday bow of all time.

"We are thrilled. It's an absolute home run for the studio. It's on the high side of what we were hoping for," Paramount president of distribution Wayne Lewellen said. "Because of Spielberg and Cruise's involvement in the film and the tremendous job of marketing and publicity, there was a tremendous amount of interest in the picture from the public -- and from all four demographic groups." Lewellen noted that 52% were younger than 25, and 54% were male.

Sony's "Spider-Man 2" holds the record for the biggest Wednesday opening of all time, with a staggering $40.4 million, followed by New Line Cinema's "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" with $34.5 million. It's also interesting to note that of all the Wednesday openings with grosses higher than "War," only Newmarket's "The Passion of the Christ" (sixth biggest with $23.6 million) was not a sequel.

As to Paramount's best bow, the distributor's previous biggest opening day was for "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider," which gleaned $18.1 million on a Friday in June 2001. And for a recent comparison, Warner Bros. Pictures' "Batman Begins" pulled in $15.1 million on its Wednesday opening just a few weeks ago, and that included grosses from midnight shows. Lewellen noted that "War" didn't have midnight shows.

U2@NYC · 07-01-2005, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
what about Schindler's List?

Schindler's List is one of the best movies ever made.

U2@NYC · 07-01-2005, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
Paramount's highly anticipated "War of the Worlds" invaded 3,908 theaters Wednesday and grossed $21.3 million on its opening day in North America. Day 1 for "War," directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Cruise, proved to be the distributor's best opening day ever and the seventh-biggest Wednesday bow of all time.

"We are thrilled. It's an absolute home run for the studio. It's on the high side of what we were hoping for," Paramount president of distribution Wayne Lewellen said. "Because of Spielberg and Cruise's involvement in the film and the tremendous job of marketing and publicity, there was a tremendous amount of interest in the picture from the public -- and from all four demographic groups." Lewellen noted that 52% were younger than 25, and 54% were male.

Sony's "Spider-Man 2" holds the record for the biggest Wednesday opening of all time, with a staggering $40.4 million, followed by New Line Cinema's "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" with $34.5 million. It's also interesting to note that of all the Wednesday openings with grosses higher than "War," only Newmarket's "The Passion of the Christ" (sixth biggest with $23.6 million) was not a sequel.

As to Paramount's best bow, the distributor's previous biggest opening day was for "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider," which gleaned $18.1 million on a Friday in June 2001. And for a recent comparison, Warner Bros. Pictures' "Batman Begins" pulled in $15.1 million on its Wednesday opening just a few weeks ago, and that included grosses from midnight shows. Lewellen noted that "War" didn't have midnight shows.

I guess the petition is not doing much...

U2Girl1978 · 07-01-2005, 10:14 AM

The movie has made 21 million so far.

phanan · 07-01-2005, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PhunkPhorce
I haven't seen War of the Worlds yet, but have a question about Spielberg. I think his greatest achievemnts were Jaws and Indiana Jones trilogy. After that (meaning since 1989) all his movies are just OK at best. "A.I." is an exception, but mostly thanks to Stanley Kubrick's "spirit".

What do you think?

I think quite a few people enjoyed the original Jurassic Park as well.

And for me personally, the first film he did with Cruise, Minority Report, was excellent.

deep · 07-01-2005, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrsSpringsteen
I'd give it 2 or 2 1/2 stars. Very impressive technical achievement, but it's just not what I've come to expect from Steven Spielberg. To me he is a storyteller w/ that rare quality of subtlety, and this has no subtlety whatsoever-and very little story.

Dakota Fanning is one fine actress, and I thought Tom did a decent job.

One thing I have to say-this movie is NOT appropriate for kids. There were two kids in front of me who looked about 7 or 8..they were terrified and the parents eventually left. It took them long enough. I don't understand why people don't read up on the content of these movies. It should be rated R.

People had strange reactions to it-the scene where Dakota goes to the river and sees what she sees, people were laughing Maybe it's that situation where people laugh because they're so unnerved and uncomfortable.

i pretty much agree with most of this

not for children

and i would call it nervous laughter

deep · 07-01-2005, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by U2Girl1978
I think TC exerted some sort of control over the movie and SS to be honest. Do you think I'm wrong?

yes, very wrong

maybe h. g . wells did

Quote:

The film's second half is weaker because the aliens have to compete for screen time with Los Angeles mob scenes, a showy and irksome display of American military hardware, and dry narration of military war tactics. But even in this second half, suspense filters through, as we watch the heartless "swans" eject their heat rays on a helpless Los Angeles.

This movie is very close to

This "War of the Worlds"

Am I the only one that has seen this movie?

06-30-2005, 11:58 AM	#41
Chizip Blue Crack Addict Join Date: May 2001 Location: gone Posts: 17,907 Local Time: 07:06 PM	those people should sign my petition __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-30-2005, 03:17 PM	#43
nbcrusader Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Southern California Posts: 22,071 Local Time: 05:06 PM	Or simply free speech

07-01-2005, 02:51 AM	#46
Aardvark747 Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Obscured By Clouds... Posts: 22,370 Local Time: 01:06 AM	Saw this yesterday, and as a HUGE TC fan, I can only say this.....Awful. So predictable...so dull. I expected so much more from TC and SS especially. Maybe I just love Jeff Wayne's musical version too much to be able to enjoy any other version of this story. 5/10

07-01-2005, 04:57 AM	#47
briarrose Acrobat Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 470 Local Time: 01:06 AM	I didn't like this movie either. I was really into for about the first 45 minutes, but then it just went downhill. I didn't like the end at all. It was too abrupt. I couldn't believe this was a Steven Spielberg movie.

07-01-2005, 04:59 AM	#48
MrsSpringsteen Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 27,760 Local Time: 08:06 PM	I'd give it 2 or 2 1/2 stars. Very impressive technical achievement, but it's just not what I've come to expect from Steven Spielberg. To me he is a storyteller w/ that rare quality of subtlety, and this has no subtlety whatsoever-and very little story. Dakota Fanning is one fine actress, and I thought Tom did a decent job. One thing I have to say-this movie is NOT appropriate for kids. There were two kids in front of me who looked about 7 or 8..they were terrified and the parents eventually left. It took them long enough. I don't understand why people don't read up on the content of these movies. It should be rated R. People had strange reactions to it-the scene where Dakota goes to the river and sees what she sees, people were laughing Maybe it's that situation where people laugh because they're so unnerved and uncomfortable.

07-01-2005, 05:08 AM	#49
PhunkPhorce The Fly Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 171 Local Time: 03:06 AM	I haven't seen War of the Worlds yet, but have a question about Spielberg. I think his greatest achievemnts were Jaws and Indiana Jones trilogy. After that (meaning since 1989) all his movies are just OK at best. "A.I." is an exception, but mostly thanks to Stanley Kubrick's "spirit". What do you think?

07-01-2005, 05:20 AM	#50
MrsSpringsteen Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 27,760 Local Time: 08:06 PM	what about Schindler's List?

07-01-2005, 05:37 AM	#51
U2Girl1978 Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: At the altar of the dark star Posts: 19,374 Local Time: 09:06 PM	I think TC exerted some sort of control over the movie and SS to be honest. Do you think I'm wrong?

07-01-2005, 05:41 AM	#52
MrsSpringsteen Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 27,760 Local Time: 08:06 PM	Tom was one of the producers on the movie so I suppose he controlled it to some extent

07-01-2005, 06:56 AM	#54
MrsSpringsteen Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 27,760 Local Time: 08:06 PM	Paramount's highly anticipated "War of the Worlds" invaded 3,908 theaters Wednesday and grossed $21.3 million on its opening day in North America. Day 1 for "War," directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Cruise, proved to be the distributor's best opening day ever and the seventh-biggest Wednesday bow of all time. "We are thrilled. It's an absolute home run for the studio. It's on the high side of what we were hoping for," Paramount president of distribution Wayne Lewellen said. "Because of Spielberg and Cruise's involvement in the film and the tremendous job of marketing and publicity, there was a tremendous amount of interest in the picture from the public -- and from all four demographic groups." Lewellen noted that 52% were younger than 25, and 54% were male. Sony's "Spider-Man 2" holds the record for the biggest Wednesday opening of all time, with a staggering $40.4 million, followed by New Line Cinema's "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" with $34.5 million. It's also interesting to note that of all the Wednesday openings with grosses higher than "War," only Newmarket's "The Passion of the Christ" (sixth biggest with $23.6 million) was not a sequel. As to Paramount's best bow, the distributor's previous biggest opening day was for "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider," which gleaned $18.1 million on a Friday in June 2001. And for a recent comparison, Warner Bros. Pictures' "Batman Begins" pulled in $15.1 million on its Wednesday opening just a few weeks ago, and that included grosses from midnight shows. Lewellen noted that "War" didn't have midnight shows.

07-01-2005, 10:14 AM	#57
U2Girl1978 Blue Crack Addict Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: At the altar of the dark star Posts: 19,374 Local Time: 09:06 PM	The movie has made 21 million so far.