KhanadaRhodes said:can this please not get into a first world poverty versus third world poverty debate? it's apples to oranges.
U2Kitten said:It is worse to be poor in America where most people aren't, it's humiliating to the kids.
dandy said:
riiiiiiight.
i can't get over how some people think that being poor, in terms of international poverty, means not being able to fix your car or pay off your credit cards. not to belittle those of us who are struggling financially, but the vast majority of the poor in industrialized nations at least have access to basic survival needs like shelter, food, running water, public education, and basic medical care.
the poorest among us are rich by international standards, and that was the whole point of this thread.
U2Kitten said:
That's why I said it's not right to judge industrialized nations by comparing them to third world nations, because the lifestyles and standards are so different there IS a different degree of poverty in our lives.
Maybe some of you lecturing types have never been in the situation...
It is worse to be poor in America where most people aren't, it's humiliating to the kids.
U2Kitten said:Maybe some of you lecturing types have never been in the situation people I have known have been in or you wouldn't talk so much and preach that they have no problems compared to somebody in a mud hut.
nbcrusader said:Bottom line: we are wealthy enough to discuss this issue while sitting comfortably behind our computers.....
LyricalDrug said:Also, these statistics don't factor in cost-of-living. The COL in the US is much higher than the rest of the world, so it's possible to be "rich" according to this site, but still be under financial pressure.
meegannie said:
The most expensive city in the US (New York) is barely in the top ten most expensive cities in the world.
LivLuvAndBootlegMusic said:
Nobody's denying the difficulty of being poor in the Us (or anywhere on earth), but you can't accuse people of not knowing what it's like when you yourself have no idea what it's like to live in a mud hut. How can you say living without running water and having no working car is worst that the poverty in Africa when you've only seen one side?
Fortunately, I doubt there's many people here that have experienced both types of poverty.
nbcrusader said:Bottom line: we are wealthy enough to discuss this issue while sitting comfortably behind our computers.....
VertigoGal said:
At the same time, I think it's important to remember that I'm sitting in front of a computer complaining about stuff, wearing nice warm fuzzy pajamas, after just eating a nice spaghetti dinner...it simply doesn't compare to having to make a 10 hour round trip each day to get a bucket of water.
U2Kitten said:
I am NOT saying it's not worse, I'm saying by OUR STANDARDS it's worse to be poor in the US than there because more people are living well here so life is harder for the poor because the cost of living is so high. People who live in places where nobody has anything don't have to deal with that. It is harder to have no plumbing and no car in a society where most people live comfortably than to live in a mud hut where everyone else has one too. And I bet a lot of them have a better attitude toward life than most US poor do, too.
LyricalDrug said:
You might as well stand on the street corner and just hand out pound notes.