Yeah, there's no excuse for that field being in such bad shape.
PS. On a scale of 1-10, how important do you think this Clemons injury is to the Seahawks?
Well first of all why are you personalizing Week 3 so much on Golden Tate that you were rooting for his knee to get busted up before the game? The guy went up and caught a ball in the air.
Maybe you could extend your righteous vendetta against every WR that benefits from a cryptic PI call, or at least the one player this weekend that obstructed justice in a double-murder case. Or not.
Clemons's major impact/absence isn't going to be on the pass rush, I would assume, although he did tally 11.5 sacks. Bruce Irvin is there, and while 2 pass rushers is obviously better than 1, Irvin will still be there to be the point man.
Irvin as a rookie was a situational player, however, and substituted to avoid being ran at. With Clemons out, the team's going to be even weaker against the run with Irvin there full time. I really don't think that will be a difference maker against Atlanta, but I'm pretty sure that based on this injury, I think San Francisco would now be a scarier NFCCG opponent than Green Bay. Not that Green Bay would be easy, but because they don't have that one player like Gore that can feast, and Rodgers v. Sherman/Browner is a strength v. strength.
So, impact on Atlanta maybe a 2 or 3. Impact on a Green Bay matchup, a 4. Impact on SF, probably a 7 or 8 (with Lynch/Wilson being out a 10). I'd want to tweak the numbers after seeing how effective the guy behind Clemons is at pressuring Matt Ryan, but that's generally my impression.