The Sad Punk
Blue Crack Addict
Ha, well, I wasn't sure if it was just personal taste that led me to say it was mindblowing, as Pixar (who I have a deep respect for, as they've advanced animation in ways that I did not previously believe possible) is certainly miles ahead technically, and Looney Tunes utilized the same techniques that artists have been using for years. There's just something extremely appealing about the look of the characters. I'm fascinated by expression, and how the most minor raise of the eyebrow can make such a difference; it's the part that I focus on with my own cartoons.
Oh, Pixar do a fabulous job, no doubt - and of course anything done in the 00's is going to be more technically advanced than something done in the 40's. But the thing about CGi is that I find it's too restricting. You can draw a great Daffy Duck frame in 15 seconds that doesn't look like anything else, like a lot of frames in classic cartoons are, or you could work on a computer generated fish model for two weeks and it's going to look pretty much the same in every frame. But I think Pixar do a better job at CGI than any other studio - certainly better than Dreamworks, who have a really erratic and unappealing style to me.