I deleted three different wildly sarcastic responses that were mainly spurred by pfan's post about setlists, in which he already seems to be setting himself up to have his dismay over the inevitable setlist override his happiness at finally seeing U2 for the first time ever.
Laz's comment just added on to my Irrational Internet Rage; taken on its own I wouldn't have batted an eye.
We all love bands and artists other than U2, so I'm curious: how many of you follow tours as closely as you do U2? Do you know what The National, Arcade Fire or whomever has played on any given night?
I'll answer for myself: I always go into concerts not knowing the setlist and this increases my enjoyment of the show. U2 is the only band that I somewhat follow to see what song they played on any given night. My point is, and it's obvious, is that the Internet has made these things more accessible. It wasn't that long ago that none of us went into concerts knowing more or less what will be played and when.
So I find it sad that Dan is hoping for a good setlist (which, of course, is entirely subjective. The vast
minority majority of people in that stadium will not care that they played Pride again, or that there were 5 songs from All That You Can't Leave Behind. But I digress), instead of enjoying his first U2 experience. And I'm not singling you out, Dan, but only using you as an example.
Anyway, I'm rambling, and probably incoherent (as usual) but my feelings on this issue are well documented. Not that anybody cares, mind you.