Guys, Tennessee Superthread

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
That happens to me. Hence why I take it off!
Though I can do it without actually taking my shirt off. So that really helps. :wink:
Well, I wasn't able to do that, so I had to slip into the ladies' room and strip halfway.
 
:hi5:

I have mastered that into an art.
:rockon: A fine one at that!

Well, I wasn't able to do that, so I had to slip into the ladies' room and strip halfway.
I learned how to do it back when I was in school. It was pissing me off, so I wiggled my way out of it and shoved it into my backpack. Nobody noticed. Then again, I sat in the back of that particular class.
 
Speaking of oversharing, I'm just really glad that fucko wasn't still awake at 4am when I was outside giving my man head. That would have turned out a bit bad.

Or it could have launched you into a new career.
 
For the record, it's really fucking hard to proofread an essay about historiography when you lot are talking about wriggling out of bras.

Not that I object.
 
For the record, it's really fucking hard to proofread an essay about historiography when you lot are talking about wriggling out of bras.

Not that I object.
Is that what the kids are calling it these days?
 
For the record, it's really fucking hard to proofread an essay about historiography when you lot are talking about wriggling out of bras.

Not that I object.
I'm sure wriggling out of bras is a lot more interesting than historiography. :wink:
 
wow, five whole minutes without a single post.

I had a phone call. What, is everybody else wanking?
 
BULLSHIT HISTORIOGRAPHY!

The idea [of "provincialising Europe" in post-colonial theory] is to write into the history of modernity the ambivalences, contradictions, the use of force, and the tragedies and the ironies that attend it. That the rhetoric and the claims of (bourgeois) equality, of citizens' rights, of self-determination through a sovereign nation state have in many circumstances empowered marginal social groups in their struggles is undeniable—this recognition is indispensable to the project of Subaltern Studies. What effectively is played down, however, in histories that either implicitly or explicitly celebrate the advent of the modern state and the idea of citizenship is the repression and violence that are as instrumental in the victory of the modern as is the persuasive power of its rhetorical strategies. Nowhere is this irony—the undemocratic foundations of “democracy”—more visible than in the history of modern medicine, public health, and personal hygiene, the discourses of which have been central in locating the body of the modern at the intersection of the public and the private (as defined by, and subject to negotiations with, the state). The triumph of this discourse, however, has always been dependent on the mobilization, on its behalf, of effective means of physical coercion. I say “always” because this coercion is both originary/foundational (i.e., historic) as well as pandemic and quotidian. Of foundational violence, David Arnold gives a good example in a recent essay on the history of the prison in India. The coercion of the colonial prison, Arnold shows, was integral to some of the earliest and pioneering research on the medical, dietary, and demographic statistics of India, for the prison was where Indian bodies were accessible to modernizing investigators.

God, you're wanking a load of shit there, Chakrabarty. Bit of a stretch to somehow get from provincialising Europe to medical studies in prisons.
 
Here's a picture of my wank.

wankms3.png


;'(
 
I'd hate to see what Bonnie would do in a cartoon about me. I doubt it'd be flattering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom