Best Films of '07

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
US: Revolutionary War & War of 1812 FTWx2.

Sorry, had to go there.

Of course, UK: Not electing a fucking moron to lead your country FTW.

But then, UK: Prime Minister kowtowing to a fucking moron FTL.
 
Behind The Mask: The Rise Of Leslie Vernon.

best fun i had watching a movie all year. several phone calls were made after it's final credits ran.
 
I had to look that up to see what movie you're talking about. It sounds interesting - it's in my Netflix queue!
 
Oh. I'm not really a horror fan. It just sounded interesting, and some of the comments from other users on the site made it sound more intriguing. :lol:
 
The National Society of Film Critics have spoken:

Picture: THERE WILL BE BLOOD
Director: Paul Thomas Anderson, There Will Be Blood
Actor: Daniel D-DAY-Lewis, There Will Be Blood
Actress: Julie Christie, Away From Her
Sup. Actor: Casey Affleck, James/Ford
Sup. Actress: Cate Blanchett, I'm Not There
Screenplay: Tamara Jenkins, The Savages
Cinematography: Robert Elswit, There Will Be Blood

No Country For Old Men shut out, and looking at the runners up and the votes cast, wasn't even close in any of the categories, with the exception of Bardem's loss by 7 votes.

http://www.indiewire.com/biz/2008/01/awards_watch_th_1.html

Because of this group's countrywide stature, it's going to be hard to ignore this sweep. You combine this with the Los Angeles Film Critics wins and I don't see how this isn't getting nominated across the board at the Oscars.

Drink that fucking milkshake!
 
Shit son. My excitement for There Will Be Blood is pretty big now.

Especially after Magnolia.
 
Indeed.

I have a set-up to see it on MLK Day. I'm seeing Cloverfield for sure, for better or worse.

At best, I see a badass monster movie and maybe one of most highly regarded films in years; at worst, I see crap and then get to see D-Day pwn bitches for 3 hours.

There's a great critic's round-up on IMDb:

http://imdb.com/features/rto/2008/critics
 
Last edited:
That's a lot of TWBB lovin'.

It deserves it too, because in just about every category No Country excelled in, TWBB exceeded it.

And they got both supporting categories correct as well. :up:
 
Still haven't seen Jesse James, but Affleck tops Bardem?

He must be pretty damn good then.
 
Bardem was great, but Robert Ford was a much more difficult role, and Affleck pulled it off magnificently.
 
lazarus said:

Awesome. It's looking like No Country, Juno, and There Will Be Blood are separating themselves as the frontrunners this year. That's exciting.

I think the noms will end up like this:

No Country
Juno
There Will Be Blood
Sweeney Todd (they need that musical)
probably Diving Bell as the "almost no shot awesome foreign film"

I could be wrong though.

Lancemc said:
Bardem was great, but Robert Ford was a much more difficult role, and Affleck pulled it off magnificently.

Cool. It's been his year I guess.
 
A tough call. But really, I think it's an unfair categorization. Affleck had what is really the lead role in his film, but he's being promoted as Supporting by the studio because of politics (younger, newer, or breakout actors get pushed downward), and because won the Lead Actor prize at Cannes.

Bardem may loom large over No Country, but it's still a supporting role. You don't get the full glimpse into his life that you do with Lewellyn Moss, or even Ed Tom Bell.

So I'd say if I were voting I'd have to go with Bardem here.
 
Instead of Diving Bell, I should've put Atonement. Not that it doesn't have a shot, but I forgot how much the Academy drools over period pieces.
 
LemonMacPhisto said:


Awesome. It's looking like No Country, Juno, and There Will Be Blood are separating themselves as the frontrunners this year. That's exciting.

I think the noms will end up like this:

No Country
Juno
There Will Be Blood
Sweeney Todd (they need that musical)
probably Diving Bell as the "almost no shot awesome foreign film"

I could be wrong though.


I think you are. Even if Sweeney Todd beats Juno for the Golden Globe (musical/comedy), I still think it has an uphill battle due to all the gore. And a lot of people are left cold by Burton's films.

You're also underestimating the love for British films, and Atonement fits many of the Academy's other weak spots. You need a love story in the final 5 somewhere more than a musical, right?

Into the Wild did very well with the SAG nominations, and those make up the largest percentage of the voting body. Penn commands a pretty great deal of respect.

Also, do not count out Michael Clayton, which isn't nearly as divisive as most of these other films.

My guess at this point would be:

No Country For Old Men
There Will Be Blood
Atonement
Juno
Michael Clayton

God knows what will win from that group.
 
LemonMacPhisto said:
Instead of Diving Bell, I should've put Atonement. Not that it doesn't have a shot, but I forgot how much the Academy drools over period pieces.


Well, I guess you already answered my criticism.
 
I haven't heard a single bad thing about Michael Clayton, and there's a legit chance Clooney will win Best Actor over D-Day. Not that I dislike Clooney at all, I think he's a terrific actor who's really getting a groove as a dramatic actor (his Supporting Oscar was well deserved for Syriana), but it's fucking Daniel Day-Lewis.

The guy hasn't won in 19 years and he's the greatest actor living today (other than Bill Murray, but that's personal preference).

I hope either P.T. Anderson or the Coen Bros. win Best Director, they're all more than deserving.
 
I'm secretly praying for a Todd Haynes Best Director win, but I think there's hardly a snowball's chance in hell of that happening.
 
Lancemc said:
I'm secretly praying for a Todd Haynes Best Director win, but I think there's hardly a snowball's chance in hell of that happening.


I'm Not There is going to get 1 nomination.

In a perfect world, it would get recognized for editing and cinematography, but I doubt it. Maybe the latter has a slim chance, but that's it.
 
Do you think they'll nominate Deakins for No Country and Jesse James, or just one of the two?
 
I don't know how one could overlook James/Ford, clearly among the year's best. And Deakins, despite never having won, is a recognizable name among the cinematographers that are responsible for nominating their own.

A double nom isn't an impossibility; it's happened before. And this category is also one that tends to go outside the Best Picture likelies for films that really excelled in this category. In fact, last year was notable in that NONE of the nominated films for cinematography were Best Picture nominees, which was refreshing (though Babel was certainly worthy of acknowledgement here).

As it happens, this year features some BP contenders that are exemplary in their look; There Will Be Blood, No Country For Old Men, The Diving Bell & The Butterfly, and Atonement all are first rate. Outside those films, you have some striking genre work in Sweeney Todd, and an amazing use of digital photography in Zodiac.

If I had to take an early stab, I'd say:

Robert Elswit, There Will Be Blood
Roger Deakins, No Country For Old Men
Janusz Kaminski, The Diving Bell & The Butterfly
Dariusz Wolski, Sweeney Todd
Roger Deakins, James/Ford

On a side note, for some reason, the Editing category is usually less welcoming, often matching up very well with BP, and it's often said that without an editing WIN you're unlikely to win the Big Prize. Strange as some of the best edited films of the year are often genre films or summer blockbusters.
 
Back
Top Bottom