girlhappy said:
Oh,please, people, as much as i love and appriciate u2,,,,comments like....glad that Bono had some fun in Africa etc....
Like..he said himself:i have time and money to do this.
The other thing i dont like is all that noise around him.He could have done it in more qiuet way if you ask me.And i always wonder:How much money he gave out of his pocket ?
just my opinion.
Girlhappy, based on these comments I wonder if you really understand the point of what Bono and Ali are doing in Africa right now? Have you read EDUN's mission statement? Don't criticize something unless you really know what you're criticizing to begin with.
Bono and Ali are in Africa to promote
investment in local economies and
sustainable business. How many times does Bono have to say "this is not about charity, this is about justice" until people really get it? His involvement with EDUN, One, Jeffrey Sachs....that has NOTHING to do with charity or how much money people give to the poor. Giving money to people DOES NOT HELP THEM IN THE LONG TERM. I don't mean to preach, but yours is only one of hundreds of similar comments I've read/heard recently and it's sad that people just don't get it.
I've told this story several times, but for me it was a helpful analogy so maybe it will be for you: When I was in Tanzania I met a man who got AIDS in 1991. He lives in a rural farming village. There is one road to this village, and I know from personal experience it is basically impassable via car. Anyway, this man doesn't have a car, or even a bicycle. Now, thanks to a lack of separation of church and state in Tanzania, the local government gave money and drugs to religious organizations who are better at getting aid to people who need it. So, this man Paul, he lived for TEN YEARS with AIDS with no treatment, even though he was eligable for free medications and aid from the government. Why does this relate to people looking at Bono's work in terms of charity? Because once Paul received on free goat, a GOAT, not any money or medicine, he was able to start selling milk, and then he was able to buy a bicycle, and THEN he was able to get to the hospital to pick up his medications. Once he started feeling better, he was able to work more, and properly care for his family.
The point: the "we are the world, save the Poor Suffering People of Africa" mentality of the 1980s doesn't work anymore. Money has gone to waste and donated food has literally rotted because the local economies cannot even support the proper distribution of aid and charity.
What Bono is doing is helping to promote economic growth, not one-time charitable giving. I could've given Paul all of my spending money, but what would he have done with it? The economy in his area is so underdeveloped, there's not even a store nearby where he could spend donated money. Africans are not poor, helpless sub-humans that are incapable of caring for themselves without charity donations from white westerners. They are perfectly capable of running their own business and growing their own crops.
All Bono and Ali are saying is that if Africa was allowed to be included in global markets, instead of normal people like us continually starting small business or reinvesting in Western organizations, Africa would be able to pull itself out of their economic blackhole. Giving charity money solves nothing. It's sad, but it's true. People want to blindly give money, but in reality the infrastructure in most of Africa is almost non-existant so the effective distribution of aid and charity is impossible. Why not solve BOTH of these problems at once?
Honestly, I'd rather have Bono reinvesting all his money into EDUN as capital, because it's obvious that charity doesn't work. People have been donating money to Africa for decades and their only worse off for it.
People keep pressuring others to donate money to the Global Fund. But recently, one of my professors asked if anyone would be interested in working with him to setup a connection between the US and a local Maasai jewelry market in Tanzania. So think for yourself, which is better in the long run? Me donating $100 to the Global Fund, or me using $100 to setup a business where I help sell Maasai jewelry in the US, opening up a new market for them so that they can continuously make money.