u2wedge
New Yorker
Remember this?: http://forum.interference.com/t94326.html
cmb737 said:I am not sure what the advantage or application would be in a rock concert. I read they are interested, but for what purpose? Besides because they can.
Ideas? Guy in 312 row 14 seat 1 hears Bullet the Blue Sky while everyone else hears silence?
I think that U2 would be more interested in using the technology involved to better their overall sound distribution within a venue, rather than limiting it.
u2wedge said:
someone said the same thing about having lights at a concert once....
cmb737 said:
I don't think that was actually ever said.
Actually what I was trying to find out was a good application for this technology in an arena concert venue. Haven't heard one yet, has anyone?
cmb737 said:great. good discussion about it. and the point of the thread is now, what?
cmb737 said:That's interesting...but I am not sure it would be very stimulating. Ya know? You wouldn't hear it until it passes you by...I don't know..maybe it would be cool.
Seems like a bit of trouble for a semi-cool effect.
What I was trying to say, and probably poorly, was that instead of using the technology to beam little bits of sound to small portions of the audience..that U2 may in fact be trying to use the overall technology in conjunction with their PA system to be able to fill in holes, correct problems that occur in large venues. Thinking more globally with the technology as opposed to thinking of it as an effect.
Maybe we are both right.
I did read the article however, I was simply looking for a concrete example of an application and discussion following. The article didn't give an example of what The Edge, for example, could use it for and stated that mostly its use is best in small spaces and homes. Wasn't sure how that would, and could, translate to 20,000 people in an arena.