(09-09-2004) Everything We Could Find...! - U2.com*

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

HelloAngel

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Sep 22, 2001
Messages
14,534
Location
new york city
Everything We Could Find...!



Ok, so the wait is nearly over and the new album is on the way. So what do we know... and what do we not know!

There’s still a lot to be revealed in the coming weeks, but, when you pull it all together, quite a few of the vital statistics are already out there. We figured it might be time to separate some of the facts from some of the wilder flights of virtual imagination and online chatter. Of course, some of these outrageously speculative stories may yet turn out to be bang on the money - others will fade within days into the obscurity of rock'n roll trivia quizzes.

So here’s our top ten checklist to guide you through the jungle of rumour and speculation.

1. U2 have been recording a new set of songs over the past two years - and now they have finished recording them! (OK, we know you know that.) It will be released on November 22nd.

2. According to Edge, at least one of them is called All Because of You. Or at least that's what the track was called when they were recording it. See our earlier story here. But what we do know for sure are titles of six other tracks on the album. Check them out here.

3. A handful of influential people - outside of the band - have heard some of these songs. The unanimous verdict seems to be that it's a pretty dang hot collection. Take Bill Flanagan, sometime U2 biographer, who says: 'I've heard it, it's great. It's the best album they have ever done. It's going to knock them out!'

4. In case you were hibernating or holidaying on Mars, earlier in the summer some of the new material went missing during a photo shoot with the band in France. 'A large slice of two years work lifted via a piece of round plastic.' reflected Edge.'It doesn't seem credible but that's what's just happened to us....' See our earlier story here.

5. The first single will be on air before the month is out. It’s called Vertigo and comes complete with a Kraftwerk cover and live studio performance. Complete story here.

6. The album has been produced by Steve Lillywhite, his first time at the desk for a whole U2 album since he produced the bands' first three albums, Boy, October and War. But others have been in the studio too - including Flood, Jacknife Lee, Nellee Hooper and Chris Thomas.

7. Any clues about the sound of the record ? Lillywhite says, 'I've heard some great songs. The Edge is playing some really great guitar.' Time Magazine, which also claims to have had an ear to the studio wall, is delighted that 'there's no crunk-style rapping, no gospel choirs or techno experiments.' 'Instead, this as-yet-untitled album is just full of confident, expansive guitar rock from the masters of the form.'
It will, according to Bono, ‘be our first rock-n-roll album'.

8. Oh yes, the title. The new album is untitled. Not that it is called 'Untitled' - just that it does not have a title yet. Or perhaps it does. But nobody yet knows what that title is. For sure. And there's certainly no official confirmation. (From us!). Yet.

9. When Vertigo goes to radio later this month, expect to find U2.Com undergoing its own revolution in look and content. When the album arrives, expect even more startling changes.

10. Plans to tour are also underway - the date of the tour will be 2005. (Rest assured, you’ll have the dates first from U2.com, just as soon as they’re buttoned down.) Paul McGuinness says the tour will be defined by ‘the character of the new album and the new production.’ So we can speculate more on the tour, when we've heard the album!

(Throughout September and October U2.Com will be posting official confirmation of all new U2 releases - as and when we get it!)
 
Strange that they're giving more credit to Steve Lillywhite for producing this. Didn't this start out as being produced solely by Chris Thomas? I remember they made such a big deal of it at the beginning. Wonder if they didn't like his work and ended up going with someone they'd successfully worked with before?
 
...this is pretty funny because...as I understand it that quote from Flanagan was reported either on here or another message board by a fan...so they must be getting some of their "confirmed" information from fansites. Is it just me or do they sound COMPLETELY out of the loop?
 
Uh...shouldn't a band's web-site be the one of the first to give band news out, not the last?

All this is old old old. Even with the album title...maybe they can't give the album title out (maybe it's not finalized, as they say), but they can at least eliminate some of the dumbass rumours (like "Solaris").
 
We should petition Interference.com to become the official page for u2. What a bunch of recycled BS, and its the official site of the band....
 
RademR said:
We should petition Interference.com to become the official page for u2. What a bunch of recycled BS, and its the official site of the band....


You should! I'd sign it.. and I'm sure other people would also.
 
BostonAnne said:
I think the band and Principal Management are getting a kick out of us. :laugh:

:lol: What do you bet they all just come here and read the forums, then shake their heads and think, 'Silly, silly fans! Wherever do they come up with these ideas? And don't they have more productive things to do?' :wink:
 
HelloAngel said:
(Rest assured, you’ll have the dates first from U2.com

LOL! Are they kidding? Seriously, that has never happened, ever.
u2.com is about the 25th place I see any given piece of U2 news. And that's when they're really on the ball.
 
The thing is, they're an official site, so they can't report rumours. I'm glad it's this way, because this way random joes with a vague interest in U2 don't know as much as we do.
 
I agree. But it's still a little ridiculous for them to insist that they'll be the first place that has any news. I realize they're not going to say "well, we might be the fourth or fifth place that posts tour dates." And, technically, they might be the first absolutely, completely official source. But the fact that they make such a blatantly inaccurate claim that they'll be the first place you'll get any given piece of news still strikes me as funny.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom