Penn State Child Molestation Scandal...continuing discussion - Page 22 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Put 'Em Under Pressure
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-08-2012, 06:59 PM   #421
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: This forum just ain't what it was pre-2007 but I still post here
Posts: 69,581
Local Time: 07:37 PM
You are the first person I have spoken to who thinks that this is a good thing for the prosecution.
__________________

Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 07:41 PM   #422
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Why would Sandusky want a bunch of Penn State people involved in this? I cannot understand this.
__________________

PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 07:29 AM   #423
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: This forum just ain't what it was pre-2007 but I still post here
Posts: 69,581
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Because the general thought from those outside of Happy Valley is that the culture and insulation of the Penn State community as a whole is partially to blame for this scope of this tragedy.
Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 11:36 AM   #424
Ghost of Love
 
gvox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: In The Ballroom of The Crystal Lights
Posts: 19,901
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post
Because the general thought from those outside of Happy Valley is that the culture and insulation of the Penn State community as a whole is partially to blame for this scope of this tragedy.
Yeah that was my thought too, but I doubted I could say that without appearing insulting...my read is that it doesn't necessarily have to be a good thing for Sandusky's defense in order for it to be a horrible thing for the prosecution...this is (potentially) the same set of people that rioted in blindingly illogical support of Joe Paterno, so...
gvox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 12:24 PM   #425
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
No it's not. That was 1500 students. State College has 80,000 people in it.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 12:48 PM   #426
Ghost of Love
 
gvox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: In The Ballroom of The Crystal Lights
Posts: 19,901
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Actually, yes, it POTENTIALLY is.

Can you absolutely say that none of the jurors picked have any past affiliation with either Sandusky, Joe Paterno or anyone else involved, and do not privately hold sympathetic views towards any of the players in this mess? Or, because of their affiliation, see this entire thing as a black mark on their beloved institution that they wish would just go away? No, you can't.

Neither can I say with any certainty that they none of them have been themselves sexually abused as children by a sports coach (much less one connected to Penn State somehow), which factoid, if disclosed, would likely cause the defense to request that person to be excused.

Besides, wasn't it alumni of Penn State that initiated a defense fund for Sandusky? :nice:

But from a more objective legal standpoint, ie in the interest of a fair trial both ways: there are so many differing opinions amongst the current and former students of Penn State, and likely few, if any of them, could be considered unaffected by a personal bias surrounding Penn State, it's administrators, or coaches past. Therefore the trial should be moved to a more neutral locale. It's not good for either the prosecution OR the defense, really.
gvox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 01:17 PM   #427
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
I don't think there's anywhere in the country where you could get a fair trial. It's been too high profile. Should it be out of county? Sure it should. But I think he'll be guilty no matter where it happens unless, again, the prosecution blows it.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:43 PM   #428
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Nice column by LaVar Arrington in yesterday's WaPo:

link
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 05:26 PM   #429
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Sounds like he's not going to be going to jail for very long. The overall case is too reliant on eyewitnesses, as is the case with most trials like this. With the credibility of some eroded, this could end with him doing very little time.

Which still has jackshit to do with how connected the jury is to Penn State.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:38 PM   #430
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Verdict is in.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:14 PM   #431
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Guilty on 45/48 counts, no bail while he awaits future sentencing.
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:15 PM   #432
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
trojanchick99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Feliz, CA (between Hollywood and Downtown LA)
Posts: 8,352
Local Time: 04:37 PM
Guilty on 45 of 48 counts for a maximum of 443 years in prison. I hope that evil man suffers.
trojanchick99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:16 PM   #433
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 07:37 PM
I have faith in the justice system again.
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:20 PM   #434
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Apparently the most serious charge in the incident to which Mike McQueary testified was rejected. What a toolbox.
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:27 PM   #435
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 07:37 PM
i wish we could move on, but there is a long road ahead. Freeh Report is next. Then the perjury trials.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:35 PM   #436
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Danny Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Harvard Supermodel Activist of the Decade Runner-Up
Posts: 9,562
Local Time: 03:37 PM
So the incident that McQueary witnessed? Were they never able to identify the victim or did he just not want to testify?
Danny Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:39 PM   #437
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Boy View Post
So the incident that McQueary witnessed? Were they never able to identify the victim or did he just not want to testify?
There were multiple charges regarding that victim, some of which were ruled guilty. At least one guilty verdict was reached with each victim. I think McQueary had enough wobbles in his testimony regarding what he saw and what he said when that some of the charges were cleared though. I think Victim 2 was never identified.
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:44 PM   #438
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Hewson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your own private Idaho
Posts: 32,729
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedracer View Post
There were multiple charges regarding that victim, some of which were ruled guilty. At least one guilty verdict was reached with each victim. I think McQueary had enough wobbles in his testimony regarding what he saw and what he said when that some of the charges were cleared though. I'm not sure if the victim himself testified or not.
In the end the only difference is that Sandusky will be out of prison when he's 510 yrs old instead of 545 yrs old.

(who am I kidding, he probably doesn't survive 2012, one carton of smokes will be all it takes)
Hewson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:48 PM   #439
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 07:37 PM
Joe Amendola just spoke to the mob. He was hilarious.
speedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:59 PM   #440
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 03:37 PM
can they put his wife in jail, too.
__________________

deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×