elevated_u2_fan
Blue Crack Supplier
LemonMelon said:there = location of an object
their = signifies ownership
they're = they are
you forgot thar... as in OVER THAR!
LemonMelon said:there = location of an object
their = signifies ownership
they're = they are
corianderstem said:I had a whole post typed out here about how the initial poster was missing an apostrophe in "lets," but once I saw it on my screen, I wasn't sure I was right.
This is depressing. My brain must be shut off today.
It should be let's because it's a contraction, right? As in "let us discuss"?
Lets would be allows. As in "Beav lets NSW call him naughty names."
Right? Someone please validate my brain.
LemonMelon said:there = location of an object
their = signifies ownership
they're = they are
corianderstem said:
That's really interesting - I've never run across anyone who does that. My thoughts flow fast, and I type fast, but I'm one of those freaks who edits as she goes because I can sense when I've typed something wrong. I don't use spellcheck because I'm so confident about this.
So far, it hasn't gotten me into too much trouble.
corianderstem said:
Where are Bono and Edge? They're over there, trying to load dead monkeys into the trunk of their car.
UberBeaver said:Nope, you still need it because "asshole" is being addressed. Anytime someone is being addressed, you need a comma. Unless someone had something called a "face asshole"; for example, NSW has an "asshole face", so when I want him to STFU I say, "Shut your asshole face, douche bag." See? In this example NSW is being address as douche bag, hence the preceding comma. HOwever, the "asshole face" is being treated as a singular entity, like a hockey stick. What kind of stick? A hockey stick. What kind of face? An asshole face. Make sense?
BonoManiac said:Someone should really direct this thread to Justin's teacher.
UberBeaver said:
What did Justin's teacher do?
waynetravis said:
Make a sentence as an example
phillyfan26 said:I only screw up your/you're or there/their/they're when I'm rambling and not thinking. I'm a person who literally writes as they speak, so ... my words usually come from the sound, not necessarily from the actual word. For instance, on my in-class papers that I write in one period, which are timed and long, I make the mistake often of phonetically sounding things out like "won" and "one." I know the difference, but I'm rushed and don't notice.
My history teacher marvels at it. She's never seen someone literally write words as if they were saying them. It's not just spelling. I punctuate my papers with things like "you know" because that's how I speak. It's unconscious.
Carek1230 said:The poor grammar and neglect or over-useage of the comma in this thread are making my heair stnad on edge! I have to admit it gripes me when people don't get these simple things straight. ESPECIALLY in this day and age of spell check when a PC will do it properly for you! Come on people!
corianderstem said:
You misspelled two words and left out the comma needed between "come on" and "people."
Oh, the irony.
corianderstem said:Where are Wayne and Babydoll? They're over there, and it looks like they're ... uh ... gosh, maybe we should leave them to their business.
How's that?
UberBeaver said:Yeah, because "Come on people" and "Come on, people" really do convey two totally different sentiments.
elevated_u2_fan said:
Beav, why aren't you teaching children somewhere?
UberBeaver said:Yeah, because "Come on people" and "Come on, people" really do convey two totally different sentiments.