Walmart not Coming to Washington DC - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-27-2013, 05:31 PM   #21
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deep
I don't shop there, sometimes I wait in the car when my driver wants to pick up low cost prescriptions.
Only an uninformed chump would pay for brand name medication that is literally the exact same molecule as the generic equivalent.

That said, I don't step foot on Walmart because it's gross
__________________

Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2013, 06:50 PM   #22
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,228
Local Time: 08:48 PM
I somehow doubt Chicago is begging for WalMarts. I have legitimate reasons for despising WalMart(not that any of the above aren't legitimate), I've worked with WalMart in the past and they basically know they are an evil necessity for certain vendors, so they will screw you as much as they legally can. The small firm I used to work for did work with them for years, they would delay payments (sometimes over a year) so they could keep collecting interest. They would deny reimbursements all the time for the most asinine reasons, i.e. if you were traveling out of town and you bought groceries and the receipt had a bottle of beer on it, even if you didn't put the beer on the expense report they would deny it. If you rented a car and car rental place gave you an upgrade for the price of the economy car they would deny it. Once again so they can gain the interest. This is how they can sell things sometimes below costs in order to drive out competition.

Also here where I live they pulled some loophole maneuver so that they could build on a city park regardless of the board's votes.

They know they're too big for small vendors to take legal action against so they screw them as much as they can. They're a disgustingly horrible devoid of ethics company.
__________________

BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 10:20 AM   #23
Refugee
 
Bonoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: a nuthouse for total Egyptfreaks
Posts: 1,040
Local Time: 04:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl View Post
Is it because of its shoppers?

Funny Pictures at WalMart Photos

There's also a facebookpage with kewl pics you can look at, on those days when you feel bad about yourself!

https://www.facebook.com/#!/WalMartPoeple?fref=ts

Quote:
Originally Posted by deep View Post
I don't shop there, sometimes I wait in the car when my driver wants to pick up low cost prescriptions.
Deep, do you think about paying the darrrn liberal a minimum wage of $12.50 an hour?
Bonoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2013, 07:50 PM   #24
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The American Resistance
Posts: 4,754
Local Time: 08:48 PM
Walmart Wins Again As Washington D.C. Mayor Vetoes $12.50 Minimum Wage - Forbes

Quote:
Sept 12th

Washington D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray today vetoed a bill that would require the largest retailers in the city to pay a $12.50 per hour minimum wage, saying it was a “job-killer” that would affect not only Walmart (its target) but also Home Depot HD -1.92%, Target TGT -1.28%, Wegman’s, Loew’s, Harris HRS +0.29% Teeter, AutoZone AZO -0.66% and Macy’s. Those retailers, he said in his veto letter, “either will not come or will not expand in the district” and will instead open stores just outside the district in Maryland, depriving low-income DC neighborhoods of both amenities and retail jobs.
A whiff of sanity from an unlikely source.

PS, why do people start threads and then abandon them once they leave the homepage of wherever they get their news?
INDY500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2013, 08:06 PM   #25
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Indy when macro again for this??
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2013, 11:40 PM   #26
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 10:48 PM
*went
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2013, 11:43 PM   #27
Blue Crack Addict
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 28,357
Local Time: 01:18 PM
Looking forward to some more INDY/JT discussions that range numerous pages.
Vlad n U 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 12:48 AM   #28
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 07:48 PM
I am still bewildered by the average Right Winger's love of Big Business/Pseudo Capitalism. How the 1 percent got average struggling Americans to fight to keep them rich is nothing short of astonishing. I am so conservative in my thoughts and actions - but I can't imagine how fighting to keep other people rich (or - making them even richer) is a "conservative" cause.
AEON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 01:29 AM   #29
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Jive Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,646
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad n U 2 View Post
Looking forward to some more INDY/JT discussions that range numerous pages.
I rarely have discussions with Indy. I'm pretty sure he has me on ignore (or rather pretends to, I'd bet)
Jive Turkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 01:32 AM   #30
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Kieran McConville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kony Island Baby
Posts: 10,244
Local Time: 12:48 PM
The real question in this world is; are you a pre- or post- 1789 conservative. Cause the latter might as well be the evil twin of liberalism and socialism. All got skin in the same game.
Kieran McConville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 02:11 AM   #31
Blue Crack Addict
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 28,357
Local Time: 01:18 PM
I'm pre-1789, nobody is allowed to show any skin outside of their face.
Vlad n U 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 02:37 AM   #32
Blue Crack Supplier
 
IWasBored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 36,783
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I am still bewildered by the average Right Winger's love of Big Business/Pseudo Capitalism. How the 1 percent got average struggling Americans to fight to keep them rich is nothing short of astonishing. I am so conservative in my thoughts and actions - but I can't imagine how fighting to keep other people rich (or - making them even richer) is a "conservative" cause.
I've been wondering this myself since I was about 10 years old. As an adult I'm still not entirely sure what the answer is, but I'm leaning toward one of two things. 1) they firmly believe in the whole "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" thing, and honestly think that in the great country that is the u s of a, everyone has a fair shake at going from a childhood on good stamps to becoming a multi-billionaire if they just work hard enough and want it enough. I don't really understand how they can subscribe so fully to this idea when so many of them haven't managed exactly that in their own lives, because if the fairy tale version of the American Dream was a truly plausible achievement for everyone rather than straight rhetoric with some anecdotal evidence to point to and say it is possible, wouldn't they have done their best to attain it? 2) my ultra-cynical side thinks it's because they chose the side of their other opinions--perhaps stance on abortion, gays, gun control, pick a topic any topic--and mindlessly follow any other stances that side holds on which they previously had no opinion, because it's the opinion they're supposed to have on corporate America as a good Republican.

But for the most part, it still baffles me too.
IWasBored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 08:25 AM   #33
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 66,288
Local Time: 09:48 PM
Increasing wealth and bringing wealthy persons and industries into your population should be a great thing, as it increases your tax base and allows you to fund infrastructure and social programs that help the greater good.

Problem is we can't find a balance between tax and encouraging wealth growth, and we can't find a middle ground between spending on social programs and being fiscally responsible because our leaders, for the most part, are a bunch of ideological twats who have no interest in compromise or the greater good, only the furthering of their party's platform and their own careers.

It makes one want to vomit.
Headache in a Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 09:22 AM   #34
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWasBored View Post
my ultra-cynical side thinks it's because they chose the side of their other opinions--perhaps stance on abortion, gays, gun control, pick a topic any topic--and mindlessly follow any other stances that side holds on which they previously had no opinion, because it's the opinion they're supposed to have on corporate America as a good Republican.
I think this is true for many people, regardless of political affiliation, although the registered Democrats I know seem more flexible than avowed Republicans I know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post
because our leaders, for the most part, are a bunch of ideological twats who have no interest in compromise or the greater good, only the furthering of their party's platform and their own careers.

It makes one want to vomit.
Same here.
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 04:42 PM   #35
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,737
Local Time: 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWasBored View Post
I've been wondering this myself since I was about 10 years old. As an adult I'm still not entirely sure what the answer is, but I'm leaning toward one of two things. 1) they firmly believe in the whole "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" thing, and honestly think that in the great country that is the u s of a, everyone has a fair shake at going from a childhood on good stamps to becoming a multi-billionaire if they just work hard enough and want it enough. I don't really understand how they can subscribe so fully to this idea when so many of them haven't managed exactly that in their own lives, because if the fairy tale version of the American Dream was a truly plausible achievement for everyone rather than straight rhetoric with some anecdotal evidence to point to and say it is possible, wouldn't they have done their best to attain it?
I do think this plays a big role.

What these people fail to comprehend that economic success is not derived solely or even primarily from a meritocracy. They will, by and large, never be millionaires, nor even wealthy. And the way that they look at the poor beneath them as unsuccessful, lazy, etc. is not altogether dissimilar to how the true upper classes consider them.

The stereotypical middle class tea party type who looks down at the "freeloading" 47% simply fails to realize that to the top 5%, he ain't much better or more successful. They still wouldn't want their kids to go to schools with his. In fact, they'll likely have few opportunities in life to ever mix.
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 04:50 PM   #36
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IWasBored View Post
I've been wondering this myself since I was about 10 years old. As an adult I'm still not entirely sure what the answer is, but I'm leaning toward one of two things. 1) they firmly believe in the whole "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps" thing, and honestly think that in the great country that is the u s of a, everyone has a fair shake at going from a childhood on good stamps to becoming a multi-billionaire if they just work hard enough and want it enough. I don't really understand how they can subscribe so fully to this idea when so many of them haven't managed exactly that in their own lives, because if the fairy tale version of the American Dream was a truly plausible achievement for everyone rather than straight rhetoric with some anecdotal evidence to point to and say it is possible, wouldn't they have done their best to attain it? 2) my ultra-cynical side thinks it's because they chose the side of their other opinions--perhaps stance on abortion, gays, gun control, pick a topic any topic--and mindlessly follow any other stances that side holds on which they previously had no opinion, because it's the opinion they're supposed to have on corporate America as a good Republican.

But for the most part, it still baffles me too.
As someone whose (i) father was born into the Great Depression and (ii) mother was a war refugee (WWII) from Eastern Europe, I can tell you that upward mobility exists for those willing to work hard and spend very wisely. Opportunity is there, but it looks a lot like hard work and sacrifice. It is not an absolute guarantee and there (as will most things in life) is a degree of “luck”.

I find that the “American Dream” has been corrupted by a consumption based society that seeks rewards today in place of the potential greater reward in the future. For all the things we didn’t have when I was growing up, I now see the wisdom in those choices.
nbcrusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 05:35 PM   #37
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
As someone whose (i) father was born into the Great Depression and (ii) mother was a war refugee (WWII) from Eastern Europe, I can tell you that upward mobility exists for those willing to work hard and spend very wisely. Opportunity is there, but it looks a lot like hard work and sacrifice. It is not an absolute guarantee and there (as will most things in life) is a degree of “luck”.

I find that the “American Dream” has been corrupted by a consumption based society that seeks rewards today in place of the potential greater reward in the future. For all the things we didn’t have when I was growing up, I now see the wisdom in those choices.
There is a certain amount of truth to that. At least there used to be. Yet - things have gotten a little out of whack. For instance, back in 1987 my dad was able to move us into a nice house in Irvine, CA (you know Woodbridge?) making about 72k a year and BS degree. Today, my wife and I live close to Irvine and have a combined income of over 250k, two Master Degrees between us, and over 15 years of experience in our fields - yet we cannot "afford" to buy a decent home by any conventional sense of mortgage to income ratio. Yes, I can pay a ridiculous price for a tiny home - but according to IRS data - our income is at the highest 2 percent - yet we can only "afford" a lower priced fixer upper home (unless I went in WAY over our head for a normal nice house we had in Irvine as a kid). How is this possible?
AEON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 06:17 PM   #38
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,737
Local Time: 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON

There is a certain amount of truth to that. At least there used to be.
Exactly.

NBC came in here telling is that through hard work, post WW2 his parents flourished. That's the point - we are ostensibly far worse off today and we don't have the same opportunities. Hell you don't have to go that far in time - the house my parents live in was maybe $200K 20 years ago. Today it's $750-800K. In the Toronto suburbs and wages have not gone up significantly at all. If you think it is realistic for today's young people to work as hard as your parents did and enjoy the same standard of living as your parents did, you're really out to pasture.

How many people of your generation bought their first family starter home at $1M? Because that's what my generation is looking at in a number of urban areas. And no, you aren't getting a mansion for that money either, I can assure you.
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 06:48 PM   #39
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
How many people of your generation bought their first family starter home at $1M? Because that's what my generation is looking at in a number of urban areas. And no, you aren't getting a mansion for that money either, I can assure you.
Try LA, where a decent home (worth $150-200K anywhere else in the country) will run you $600K at least. And a great deal of what inventory there is, is being bought by foreign investors, cash. It's ridiculous to consider buying a home, unless you happen to win the lottery. And even then, homes that start out reasonably-priced will attract dozens of bids. Three years ago the home across the street was put on the market at $400K; the eventual owners paid $600K to get in, and then had to sink another $200K into it to bring the home up to code. Insanity.
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 07:29 PM   #40
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbcrusader View Post
As someone whose (i) father was born into the Great Depression and (ii) mother was a war refugee (WWII) from Eastern Europe, I can tell you that upward mobility exists for those willing to work hard and spend very wisely. Opportunity is there, but it looks a lot like hard work and sacrifice. It is not an absolute guarantee and there (as will most things in life) is a degree of “luck”.
This attitude is a major reason why we can't accomplish anything. "Upward mobility exists if you're willing to work hard!" is one of the biggest hindrances we have to progress, because it's simply not true in so many cases. There are tons of people who are willing to work hard who aren't afforded the opportunity for upward mobility. If you can't see that, I don't know where the hell you've been during my lifetime.
__________________

PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×