Scores Dead, Wounded; Tourists Held Hostage In Coordinated Mumbai Terror Strikes

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

yolland

Forum Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
7,471
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
New York Times, November 26



NEW DELHI — Coordinated terrorist attacks struck the heart of Mumbai, India’s commercial capital, on Wednesday night, killing dozens in machine-gun and grenade assaults on at least two five-star hotels, the city’s largest train station, a movie theater and a hospital.

Even by the standards of terrorism in India, which has suffered a rising number of terrorist attacks this year, the assaults were particularly brazen and drastically different in scale and execution. The attackers used boats to reach the urban peninsula where they hit, and their targets were sites popular with tourists. The Mumbai police said the attacks killed at least 80 people and wounded 240, according to preliminary reports. Guests who had escaped the hotels told television stations that the attackers were taking hostages, singling out Americans and Britons. A previously unknown group claimed responsibility, though that claim could not be confirmed. It remained unclear whether there was any link to outside terrorist groups.

Gunfire and explosions rang out well into the night. Hours after the assaults began, the landmark Taj Mahal Palace & Tower Hotel, next to the famed Gateway of India, was in flames. Guests banged on the windows of the upper floors as firefighters worked to rescue them. Fire also raged inside the luxurious Oberoi Hotel, according to the police. Some guests, including two members of the European Parliament who were visiting on a trade delegation, remained in hiding in the hotels, making desperate cellphone calls, some of them to television stations, describing their ordeal. Alex Chamberlain, a British citizen who was dining at the Oberoi, told Sky News television that a gunman had ushered 30 or 40 people from the restaurant into a stairway and, speaking in Hindi or Urdu, ordered them to put up their hands. “They were talking about British and Americans specifically,” he recounted. “There was an Italian guy, who, you know, they said, ‘Where are you from?’ and he said he’s from Italy, and they said, ‘Fine,’ and they left him alone.”

Sajjad Karim, 38, a British member of the European Parliament, told Sky News: “A gunman just stood there spraying bullets around, right next to me.” Before his phone went dead, Mr. Karim added: “I managed to turn away and I ran into the hotel kitchen and then we were shunted into a restaurant in the basement. We are now in the dark in this room, and we have barricaded all the doors. It’s really bad.”

Attackers had also entered Cama and Albless Hospital, according to Indian television reports. Several high-ranking law enforcement officials, including the chief of the antiterrorism squad and a commissioner of police, were reported killed. The military was quickly called in to assist the police. Hospitals in Mumbai, formerly Bombay, have appealed for blood donations. As a sense of crisis gripped much of the city, schools and colleges announced they would be closed Thursday.

Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister for Maharashtra State, where Mumbai is, told the CNN-IBN station that the attacks hit five to seven targets, concentrated in the southern tip of the city, known as Colaba and Nariman Point. But even hours after the attacks began, the full scope of the assaults was unclear. Unlike previous attacks in India this year, which consisted of anonymously planted bombs, the assailants on Wednesday night were spectacularly well-armed and very confrontational.

In some cases, said the state’s highest-ranking police official, A.N. Roy, the attackers opened fire and disappeared. Indian officials said the police had killed four of the suspected attackers and captured nine, The Associated Press reported.

Around midnight, more than two hours after the series of attacks began, television images from near the historic Metro Cinema showed journalists and bystanders ducking for cover as gunshots rang out. Television showed the charred shell of a car in front of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, formerly Victoria Terminus, the mammoth railway station. A nearby gas station was blown up. The landmark Leopold Café, a favorite tourist haunt, was also hit.

Reached by phone, three guests trapped inside the Taj said about 1 a.m. that they had heard a fresh explosion and gunfire in the old wing of the hotel. A 31-year-old man who was inside the Taj attending a friend’s wedding reception said he was getting a drink around 9:45 p.m. when he heard something like firecrackers — “loud bursts” interspersed with what then sounded like machine-gun fire. A window of the banquet hall shattered, and guests scattered under tables and were quickly escorted to another room in the hotel, he said. No one was allowed to leave. Just before 1 a.m., another loud explosion rang out, and then another about a half-hour later, the man said. At 6 a.m., he said that when the guests tried to leave the room early Thursday, gunmen opened fire. One person was shot. The man’s friend, the groom, was two floors above him, in the old wing of the hotel, trapped in a room with his bride. One of the explosions, the man said, took the door off its hinges. He blocked it with a table. Then came another, and gunfire rang out throughout the evening. The man did not want to be identified for fear of being tracked down.

Rakesh Patel, a British businessman who escaped the Taj, told a local television station that two young men armed with a rifle and a machine gun took 15 people hostage, forcing them to the hotel roof. The gunmen, dressed in jeans and T-shirts, “were saying they wanted anyone with British or American passports,” Mr. Patel said. He and four others managed to slip away in the confusion and smoke of the upper floors, he said. He said he did not know the fate of the remaining hostages.

Clarence Rich Diffenderffer, of Wilmington, Del., said that after dinner at the hotel he headed up to the business center on the fifth floor. “A man in a hood with an AK-47 came running down the hall,” shooting and throwing four grenades, Mr. Diffenderffer said. “I, needless to say, beat it back to my room and locked it, and double-locked it, and put the bureau up against the door.” Mr. Diffenderffer said he was rescued hours later, at 6:30 a.m., by a cherrypicker. “That was pretty hairy,” he said. “I don’t like heights.”

A similar situation unfolded at the Oberoi. Among those apparently trapped were top executives and board members of Hindustan Unilever, part of the multinational corporate giant, the newspaper the Times of India reported. Indian military forces arrived outside the Oberoi at 2 a.m., and some 100 officers from the central government’s Rapid Action Force, an elite police unit, entered later. CNN-IBN reported the sounds of gunfire from the hotel just after the police contingent went in.

In Washington, the State Department immediately condemned the attacks, as did President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team. There were no immediate reports of American casualties.

A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahedeen said it had carried out the attacks. It was not known who the group is or whether the claim was real.

India has been hit by a succession of terrorist attacks in the past several months. Many of them were initially attributed to Islamist militants, although in recent weeks, the police have pointed to a Hindu terrorist network as well, making several arrests. Mumbai has suffered several major terrorist attacks in recent years.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Times' breaking news blog, The Lede, is continuing to post updates. The most recent item says that Nariman House, a Jewish community center popular with Jewish travelers, is also under siege. More than 100 hostages are still being held at the Taj Hotel.

ETA: The BBC is reporting that gunmen have taken hostages in an office block in the financial district as well.


Terrifying and grim.
 
Last edited:
Another success for that war on terra.

PS

Would ask the question who benefits from this?
 
Obviously!

George W. Bush and the Likudniks flamed the hate between India and Pakistan.

Put that against the mainstream media explanation, which is likely to be:-

"See, I told you dem Islamists are both evil AND incredibly stupid AND dangerous, ohmigod, HYSTERIA!!!".

But, yeah, obviously it's just another coincidence that this happens while the President Elect is deciding on foreign policy.
 
The first place I would expect a conspiracy to be connected to a terrorist attack in India is within the Pakistani ISI. I fail to see how it has anything to do with Obama selecting his cabinet. If we play cui bono with every event our brains will find conspiracies whether they exist or not.
 
^ Look for the BJP to call for a vote of no confidence in the Singh government soon.
 
Hopefully this is a wake up call to the Indian government in terms of security measures! Almost everybody I talk to over there complains about the lack of security everywhere. Even I experienced it first hand in 2005 at Mumbai airport where the searching was laughably lax! With the second highest populated country in the world and consequently a huge civilian risk, you'd think there would be an equivalent of a DHS over there! :|
 
I have some family in Mumbai but as far as I know they're all safe. This looks like a very specific attack on westerners staying there at those hotels. And not to mention other tourist hangouts like Leopold's Cafe. Do your relatives live near those areas? I'll pray that they are safe! :hug: :pray:
 
The city will bounce back pretty quick I suppose, like it did in 2006 after the train bombings. But the fucking government better do something! I'm amazed that the country has been facing terrorist attacks for years and years, long before the US faced it's big one on 9/11 and still there is no department in the govt. against terrorist attacks! :der: ...unless I'm missing something but I haven't heard of one.
 
I have relatives in Mumbai and my immediate family was planning on visiting the motherland this Christmas.. :|:|

Yikes.

I've been watching this over the last few days. I'm still trying to wrap my mind around what's going on.

I truly hope all of your relatives are OK, BD. :hug:
My Mom ask me today, when we were watching on CNN, what's it all about and the best I could answer was they wanted hostages from Europe and the US for monetary purposes. :shrug:.
I haven't seen any other footage since we watched today.
 
^ There isn't a full accounting for yet of all the hostages' nationalities, but the overwhelming majority of them--as well as of the dead and wounded--were Indians. While it's noteworthy and unprecedented (for India) that at least some of the gunmen were apparently particularly interested in taking Westerners hostage, that was clearly not their sole focus.

The various commando operations at the two hotels and the Jewish center are winding down now; I assume by tomorrow the scope of the damages, for lack of a better word, will be fairly clear.
I'm amazed that the country has been facing terrorist attacks for years and years, long before the US faced it's big one on 9/11 and still there is no department in the govt. against terrorist attacks! :der: ...unless I'm missing something but I haven't heard of one.
No, there's nothing equivalent to Homeland Security; the closest thing to it presently would be the National Security Council. Are you familiar with the Saxena Committee proposals that were drafted after the Kargil War? The utter failure to implement them is a major reason why domestic security, particularly intelligence coordination, is so inadequate.
 
There's an incredible lack of security there.
My God, I was watching one reporter today who said she was able to walk, nearly into the lobby of the hotel. No one stopped her and they didn't have the area cordoned off. She and her crew moved further back for their own protection because of the explosions that were going off in and around the hotel.
 
Even I experienced it first hand in 2005 at Mumbai airport where the searching was laughably lax!


It was incredibly ridiculous when I was there this summer.

My hotel was right by the Taj. It was a bit of a freakout to see the Taj on the news this weekend. I was walking around that waterfront area one morning last June, waiting for a ride to the Pilgrim Center. :shudder:
 
Put that against the mainstream media explanation, which is likely to be:-

"See, I told you dem Islamists are both evil AND incredibly stupid AND dangerous, ohmigod, HYSTERIA!!!".

But, yeah, obviously it's just another coincidence that this happens while the President Elect is deciding on foreign policy.

Having had the chance to research this in a bit more detail, I would probably somewhat roll back on my implication that these attacks were 'false flag'.

I am keeping an open mind, but I do admit of the possibility that it was caused by Islamist terrorists.
 
One thing that occurs to me, when I stayed in Malaysia, the second time I went here I stayed in a 5 star (and US hotel group owned) hotel and I did notice the security was tight enough - cars were searched on the way in and there was an armed policewoman on duty all the time INSIDE the hotel.

It does occur to me that these sorts of hotels would be obvious targets, would question the lack of security in India, as other posters already said.
 
The Taj Mahal hotel in Mumbai, India, temporarily increased security after being warned of a possible terrorist attack, the chairman of the company that owns the hotel said Saturday.

But Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata said those measures, which were eased shortly before this week's terror attacks, could not have prevented gunmen from entering the hotel.

"If I look at what we had ... it could not have stopped what took place," Tata said in an interview with CNN's Fareed Zakaria that will air Sunday.

"It's ironic that we did have such a warning, and we did have some measures," Tata said, without elaborating on the warning or when security measures were enacted. "People couldn't park their cars in the portico, where you had to go through a metal detector."

However, Tata said the attackers did not enter through the entrance that has a metal detector. Instead, they came in a back entrance, he said.

"They knew what they were doing, and they did not go through the front. All of our arrangements are in the front," he said.

"They planned everything," he said of the attackers. "I believe the first thing they did, they shot a sniffer dog and his handler. They went through the kitchen."

Taj Mahal hotel owner: We had warning - CNN.com
 
Having had the chance to research this in a bit more detail, I would probably somewhat roll back on my implication that these attacks were 'false flag'.

I am keeping an open mind, but I do admit of the possibility that it was caused by Islamist terrorists.

I blame the British


Mumbai terrorists were 'funded by cash raised in UK mosques'

By Mail On Sunday Reporter
Last updated at 12:19 AM on 30th November 2008

A banned Islamic terrorist group funded with cash raised in British mosques is believed to be behind the Mumbai attacks.


Mumbai terrorists were 'funded by cash raised in UK mosques' | Mail Online
 
I am keeping an open mind, but I do admit of the possibility that it was caused by Islamist terrorists.
As opposed to...? Bajrang Dal, RSS, Naxalites, LTTE, who? I haven't heard a single commentator, credible or otherwise, suggest these men could be anything but the militant Islamists they presented themselves as, though there are and will likely continue to be debates over to what extent they may have been 'homegrown' vs. Pakistani.


I don't doubt this disaster will occasion increased investment in manpower, equipment and training for police and special forces, and hopefully the woefully underfunded Intelligence Bureau as well. While this wasn't the deadliest terrorism Mumbai has seen--the '93 and '06 bombings were both worse--the singling out of giant hotels frequented by international businessmen, wealthy tourists and their Mumbaikar counterparts was an unprecedentedly direct strike at India's surging economy and rising international status, one they literally can't afford to ignore.

Now, whether they can achieve all that without ratcheting up tensions with Pakistan externally and communal tensions internally to the boiling point...
 
Last edited:
Obviously!

George W. Bush and the Likudniks flamed the hate between India and Pakistan.

Wanderer,

I'm surprised that you would say such a thing.
We had nothing to do with this attack (which was directed against us).
Make no mistake - even if entire world lived in peace, there would STILL be terrorist attacks because that's what the word means....TERROR.

The extremists live for violence and blood and they cannot grasp the concept of living in peace - it's either THEIR way or no way.

As for the "likudniks" flaming hate between India and Pakistan......that's just ridiculous. These two countries have been at odds for years and their rivalry has nothing to do with us.

Israel mourns the loss of hundreds of innocent people slaughtered in this barbaric act of terrorism (including 8 of our citizens).

Report: Mumbai terrorist says mission specifically targeted Israelis - Haaretz - Israel News
 
Never forget the beauty of irony :sexywink:

It seems plausible that the anti-Jewish ideology, reinforced with theological justification, of Islamist groups would be a factor in attacking Nariman House, but that shouldn't mean we can't softly mock the stereotypical "Jews run the world" conspiracy theories (and before I have to defend that mockery the irony of the statement works both ways).

Justifying humour is never funny ;)
 
Never forget the beauty of irony :sexywink:

It seems plausible that the anti-Jewish ideology, reinforced with theological justification, of Islamist groups would be a factor in attacking Nariman House, but that shouldn't mean we can't softly mock the stereotypical "Jews run the world" conspiracy theories (and before I have to defend that mockery the irony of the statement works both ways).

Justifying humour is never funny ;)

:hug::hug::hug::hug::hug:

I'm terribly sorry.......I didn't know you were being humorous.
Please forgive me....
 
Back
Top Bottom