Racist Police Response to Ferguson Protests

[Vlad n U 2]

I love conservative dummy spits on Interference.com.

[BVS]

Originally Posted by bigjohn2441

What? I cant say "liberal" now either?

You know what, fuck you and the rest of you snobby, uptight, LIBTARD cunts.

Piss on this fucking forum.

Well after all these years you proved ONE thing...

Too bad it wasn't policy, morally, or even side based.

[DaveC]

Yeah, we're so thin skinned that we can't take being called "liberal". Never mind that the rest of your post was vulgar, crude, and completely inflammatory. Good fucking riddance.

Why is it that conservatives think that left-leaning people consider the word "liberal" such a horrible insult? Many seem to think that it's an awful thing to be called and that it's on par with a racial slur and will drive anybody into a froth, but I've yet to meet one true liberal who gets upset at being called that. At worst, I might see mild annoyance but that mostly arises from the fact that it's trying to be used as an insult (and usually at the expense of an actual reply).

Seriously, why do conservatives think being called a "liberal" is so awful to actual liberals?

(Maybe this is a topic for another thread)




Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Irvine511]

Originally Posted by bigjohn2441

What? I cant say "liberal" now either?



You know what, fuck you and the rest of you snobby, uptight, LIBTARD cunts.



Piss on this fucking forum.

Drunk again? Does your black girlfriend know?


Sent from

[gump]

This thread makes me lose my faith in humanity little by little every time I decide to read it.

[Diemen]

Originally Posted by bigjohn2441

What? I cant say "liberal" now either?

You know what, fuck you and the rest of you snobby, uptight, LIBTARD cunts.

Piss on this fucking forum.

You never disappoint.

[bobsaget77]

This is why I don't like to associate myself with any side of the political spectrum.....some people can totally embarrass and misrepresent a group with certain political ideologies. I think this can actually go for nearly any major group in this country.
I gave up on being a "conservative" or "republican" whenever they decided that the tea party is the only way to go and when they decided to stoop as low as their main opponent, whom they had justifiably criticized. But now they do almost the same thing, especially amongst their leadership, which makes them no different.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Headache in a Suitcase]

I say I support the police, people call me a conservative fuck tard. I turn around and say I'm strongly pro gun control, and I'm a liberal pussy.

This country sucks.

Disclaimer: don't support the Ferguson police, who are clearly fuck tards.

Or bigjohn. Cause, ya know, fuck tard.

[corianderstem]

Originally Posted by bigjohn2441

What? I cant say "liberal" now either?

You know what, fuck you and the rest of you snobby, uptight, LIBTARD cunts.

Piss on this fucking forum.

Christ, what an asshole.

[david]

Ugh. Yeah. As I have grown older I've taken a more centrist position in politics.

[Headache in a Suitcase]

Originally Posted by david

Ugh. Yeah. As I have grown older I've taken a more centrist position in politics.

it's utterly ridiculous how certain issues just divide themselves on party lines, as if one's opinion on fiscal policy has anything to do with basic human rights.

i mean for fucks sake, it wasn't that long ago that the republicans were the party that was progressive on civil rights and the democrats were ass backwards.

we're just fucked, really.

[bobsaget77]

Our politicians and government will do anything that can distract us from the real problems.
I think social issues are really causing nothing to get done. We're so much further apart than we were 20-30 years ago; and this causes a bitter rivalry for control of power on both sides. So consequently, nothing at all will get done. Sadly, I don't see this trend changing in the future.
Tea Party conservatives aren't willing to move towards the center and most liberals aren't willing to either. They'll keep battling it out on gay marriage and racism to no end and attract the kinda people who agree with them. Those are not political issues! How to fix 18 trillion in debt is a little bit more of a problem....or I don't know maybe try keeping us informed on the whereabouts of Russia and China......or Isis maybe......or someone actually proposing a legit immigration reform. Because every immigration reform that has been proposed was for show only or was just absolutely horrific. But no, we just gotta keep fighting the zealous battle for supposed equality or traditionalism or some BS like that.
Yeah, so we're basically f**king screwed.

Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[bobsaget77]

.




Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[BVS]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

Our politicians and government will do anything that can distract us from the real problems.
I think social issues are really causing nothing to get done. We're so much further apart than we were 20-30 years ago; and this causes a bitter rivalry for control of power on both sides. So consequently, nothing at all will get done. Sadly, I don't see this trend changing in the future.
Tea Party conservatives aren't willing to move towards the center and most liberals aren't willing to either. They'll keep battling it out on gay marriage and racism to no end and attract the kinda people who agree with them. Those are not political issues! How to fix 18 trillion in debt is a little bit more of a problem....or I don't know maybe try keeping us informed on the whereabouts of Russia and China......or Isis maybe......or someone actually proposing a legit immigration reform. Because every immigration reform that has been proposed was for show only or was just absolutely horrific. But no, we just gotta keep fighting the zealous battle for supposed equality or traditionalism or some BS like that.
Yeah, so we're basically f**king screwed.

Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Well this idea that equality should be ignored because debt is more important IS part of the problem. But yes unwillingness to compromise is part of the problem as well.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[bobsaget77]

Originally Posted by BVS

Well this idea that equality should be ignored because debt is more important IS part of the problem. But yes unwillingness to compromise is part of the problem as well.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

It's supposed equality and very much opinionated. Shouldn't be an issue because it's not a big deal. Let each state make their own ruling on gay marriage because it wouldn't be as much of a problem. Don't force it in Texas, allow it in California, etc. Would make it much less of an issue.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Diemen]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

It's supposed equality and very much opinionated. Shouldn't be an issue because it's not a big deal. Let each state make their own ruling on gay marriage because it wouldn't be as much of a problem. Don't force it in Texas, allow it in California, etc. Would make it much less of an issue.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

I think gay people in Texas might not like the idea that they should have to wait longer to get equal treatment under the law.

[bobsaget77]

A majority of people in Texas don't support it. Majority should rule; as it always has. Not everyone is going to be happy about every decision. That's why, like I said, California can legalize it. The majority of their population will support it.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[DaveC]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

A majority of people in Texas don't support it. Majority should rule; as it always has. Not everyone is going to be happy about every decision. That's why, like I said, California can legalize it. The majority of their population will support it.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

By that logic though it's entirely likely that at least one state would still have racial segregation. Would you say that the black folks living there should just live with it?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[nbelcik]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

A majority of people in Texas don't support it. Majority should rule; as it always has. Not everyone is going to be happy about every decision. That's why, like I said, California can legalize it. The majority of their population will support it.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Majority rule doesn't trump equality for all citizens. What if one state wanted to legalize segregation? Or one state wanted to discriminate against Jewish people? Would you still say that "not everyone is going to be happy about every decision?"


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[deep]

Anyone that argues that states should decide for themselves is making the state's rights argument. That worked for segregation, Jim Crow laws, and slavery, until it didn't.