|
Click Here to Login |
Register | Premium Upgrade | Blogs | Gallery | Arcade | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Log in |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 03:14 AM
|
Proposition 8 discussion continued
While I'm always a little hesitant to extend an often heated and emotional topic into a new thread, it felt like the discussion on this one wasn't quite over yet, and certainly the actual news story isn't over either.
__________________In the interests of helping to keep this productive and purposeful, I would strongly suggest that at least for now, we stay focused on the specific title topic and the various lines of discussion about it that we already had going in Part One. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 03:14 AM
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||||
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,471
Local Time: 03:14 AM
|
I had some things I wanted to follow up on from the previous thread...
You're really more of a same-sex parenting skeptic, aren't you? As I understand it, you have doubts about same-sex-headed families as a childrearing environment, and while recognizing that gays and lesbians do and will have children regardless, you're unwilling to see that USDA Grade A stamp of cultural approval placed on it. Is that not correct? Quote:
![]() Quote:
I think the history books might do us a disservice with their tendency to compress the stories of civil rights struggles into a timeline of key legislative victories livened with biographies of civil rights "celebrities," seeming paragons of righteousness and devotion who inspired thousands of others to do the step-by-step grassroots grunt work--sometimes brilliantly and to great effect, sometimes stumblingly and to heartbreakingly little avail. In real life, breakthroughs are seldom if ever spontaneous and change can feel like it takes an eternity, even if in retrospect things might look to--and have--changed drastically in what by historical standards is an astoundingly short time. I don't know that I have anything to add to them, but I thought melon had some great points and insights on this topic. Quote:
I think the "ghettoized" perception of gay people plays a role here, too; parents may fear that their children will somehow vanish into a disconcertingly unfamilar social "underworld." Quote:
I really like the thoughtful generosity in your posts, hope you'll stick around. ![]() If your expectations for it are on the order of nonstop romantic passion and continuously effortless mutual affirmation of what fantastic people you both are, then yes, you'll almost certainly be in for a nasty shock if you get married. (You could say much the same for parenting, except that particular relationship can't be readily terminated.) No one can ever know in advance which and how many struggles and disappointments lie ahead, so you have to have a robust and flexible shared vision of what you want from the future. And the self-awareness to know your own relationship weaknesses as well as your partner's...and the self-confidence to know that if it must come to an end, you can move on alone if need be. That said, if you're suited for marriage and clear-headed about what it entails and, yes, have some measure of luck going for you as well...then from where I stand, it's one of the greatest and most profoundly enriching experiences there can be, to have love, intimacy, support, companionship and a shared project in life as the two of you progress through all its twists and turns, perhaps together with the children, born or adopted, you've committed yourselves to guiding into adulthood. With the support (and occasionally hindrance ![]() Quote:
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 09:14 PM
|
Quote:
Racist behaviour of his peer group? Seriously? Why does the individual always equal the group with you, I don't get it. So racist behaviour from a straight man would be racist behaviour of your peer group? Your constant stretches in order to paint certain groups are getting tiresome... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ásgarðr
Posts: 11,786
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
Besides, I'd think you'd be happy to see bleeding-heart liberalism die a slow death in the gay community. I know Ann Coulter once implied why it would be in the gay community's interest to do so. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
nice try, but your stereotypes and wishful thinking about those on "the left" really doesn't work here. i'll point out, again, the fact that i have continually pointed out the epidemic of homophobia in the african-american community, and i point out how it kills gay black men often in the form of HIV. what really sucks is when i'm somehow supposed to be called to account for racism on the part of a few isolated individuals in the wake of a very heated, emotional campaign where a particular group (gays) were viciously attacked by another (mormons) and a third party (african-americans) apparently made the difference at the polls (not solely, but in part). understanding that there's anger, that there's a need to blame someone, is far, far different from excusing or looking the other way at racism. and, really, i have a tough time with what you've sited. 12 posts on someone's blog? someone may have used the n-word at a rally? i'm supposed to think this is evidence of rampant racism in the CA gay community? what this seems to be is either, a) conservative fear-mongering (see michellemalkin.com for the best examples of this on the web) that's designed to reduce sympathy for the gays who were just bashed by their fellow citizens, or b) a tactic to try to break up the Obama "coalition" by pitting one oppressed group against another. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
What needs to be done here is to target several large states. Let's be blunt, who cares what Kansas thinks. What you need are large population centres and look for favourable court composition. If people want to complain about judicial activism, let's give them a reason to whine.
And then you need to litigate everything under the sun that in any way pertains to gay rights in those states. Everything. From employment law, to trusts & estate issues, benefits, etc. Anything with a whiff of discrimination against the gay and lesbian community, litigate it. Eventually you will build up so much persuasive precedent that you will have almost de facto court rulings in favour of gay rights. Then you tackle gay marriage as an afterthought almost. There has been some talk of targeting Churches and their tax exempt status. I think this is a bad idea, mostly because they tend to have good counsel and stay just short of crossing the line. This is also very bad PR. But that brings us to the next point. The LDS Church needs to be eviscerated in the public realm. They really made an egregious error here in my view. Evangelicals think they're not Christians and are some kind of loons. Now the secular or quasi-secular left may also think that Mormonism is kind of strange, but they generally don't get involved in debating the merits of Christian thought. The LDS Church has crossed that line and has now become synonymous with something ugly among basically every progressive who would have in an indirect way been valuable to them. They've alienated people who never really had a problem with them to begin with and that will come at a high, high price long term. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 09:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Massachusetts is still standing.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 03:14 AM
|
Quote:
Understandably this has been an immensely disappointing vote for the gay community and I repeat that I very much regret the result of this vote, but a few weeks ago claims that the 'n word' was used at a Palin rally was in various blogs and forums cited as evidence that Republican conservatives are racists. To me, that is a double standard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Refugee
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,449
Local Time: 09:14 PM
|
Quote:
There are almost always a few whack-jobs at big rallies. Some comments are so 'out there' they aren't really worthy of repudiation. It just kind of goes without saying that some comments are ridiculous and regrettable. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
War Child
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 715
Local Time: 07:14 PM
|
Nice generalization. If that were the case, I - a straight, white, female - would have voted for McCain Palin and yes on Prop 8. That sure as hell didn't happen...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
as i was riding home on the metro last night, Memphis and i agreed to meet outside the station and walk to our favorite indian buffet for dinner. a few stops from home, i got a text from him saying, "there are fucking mormons recruiting right here." i got instantly angry. and i my impulse was that i hoped the train would fucking hurry up because i wanted to go and pick a fight. not a physical fight, but get into an argument. i really did. now, pause for a moment and consider that i've defended Mormons, at length, here in FYM. i knew at least a dozen Mormons growing up in my New England town, and i've always though, almost without exception, they were lovely people. i've stood up for diamond, and i've made the comparison that white protestant evangelicals really aren't in a position to mock the Mormons since may of us think their religion is pretty much bullshit as well. i think much of Mormonism is kind of wack-a-doodle, but i really don't care. without exception, the Mormons i've met are lovely. especially the one i made coffee for in the morning. ahem. so as i was going up the escalator, blood pumping, i began to stop and think and realize that protesting the Mormon church itself is perfectly legitimate. that, were i to get into a discussion with a Mormon missionary and the subject were to turn to this and said missionary wanted to get into a discussion, that would be perfectly legitimate. if one were to knock on my door, i'd give him an earful. but to seek out and antagonize an individual who's merely doing his job is something entirely different. it took me a while to calm down and come to that conclusion. and by the time i got to the top of the escalator, there were no Mormons in sight. just Memphis. and we talked about this on the way to dinner. i do feel like "my people" have been assaulted by the Mormon church, and by many individual Mormons, but not by all Mormons, and certainly not by that individual Mormon. now, as for african-americans, i'm well aware how they voted (at least according to the exit polls). and i think that gays absolutely have to reach out to the african-american community, and i think that black church leaders need to stop with the sweeping homophobia that often comes from the pulpit (and Obama, to his credit, has called them out on this; i hope he'll do more). but i've lived in what might be called the inner-city, alongside the black urban poor. never had a problem, never encountered any homophobia from a black person. further, since gay men tend to be urban "pioneers" and will move into "developing" neighborhoods much sooner than their straight peers, you'll find that in many cities, the first white neighbors a black person might have could well be a white gay couple. so, obviously, my experience tells me that feeling affronted by black people or individual Mormons is bogus. but the anger is there, and when we're angry, we look for easily identifiable targets. and it takes a moment to calm down, take a breath, and realize what we're doing and what we're saying and figure out who our opponents actually are. it's not individuals, it's institutions. what gay people must do is share their stories, and share their lives, and talk to straight people and appreciate those that stand by us. much responsibility falls upon our shoulders. Memphis once went to a conference where B.D. Wong spoke. he said, "if you want to live in a world where you can put a picture of your partner on your desk, then you must put a picture of your partner on your desk." it might be as simple as that. so let's get on with the work that has to be done. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
the irony of the Mormon Church lecturing others on marriage really is hilarious. marriage is between a man and several 14 year old girls? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
the difference, i think, was that comments by Pailn were seen as trying to incite such statements -- "real America" and "palling around with terrorists" and "Barack Obama doesn't see America the way you and i do." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think the LDS Church is a racket, much like Hitchens thinks so. But I don't really care. People want to believe in what I consider to be utter nonsense - go right ahead. I don't hold a high opinion of the Church I was raised in either. The thing is though, whereas before, I didn't care at all, now I think the LDS Church isn't just a racket, but a bigoted organization with a bigoted agenda which has hurt people I know and love. And I don't think their motivations are pure either; the fact it is a highly political and self-serving bigotry is even more pathetic. So, good job LDS Church, you've now alienated people who never cared enough about you to hold you in judgment. And the bullies that you are trying to impress still think that you are bloody lunatics who are not Christian, and who insult their Christ every day with your lying quasi-Bible and heretic non-prophet thief. They don't think any better of you today than they did a year ago, but now you have the added bonus of having everyone on the left fed up with you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Blue Crack Supplier
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 34,032
Local Time: 10:14 PM
|
^ Mittens 2012!
what is true is that, while i'll never hold individual Mormons accountable, i absolutely now view their church as a threat to my existence. that will not be forgotten. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,885
Local Time: 09:14 PM
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 12:14 PM
|
I think this is a decent approach, competition in the marketplace
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Refugee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,032
Local Time: 07:14 PM
|
I've always been ambivalent to the LDS, kinda barking loons but pretty harmless really. Now they're down there with Falwell/Religious right, Radical Islam and Scientology, dangerous and to be wary of. I've stopped my youngest hanging out with the kid across the street which was tough, he's 11 years old but was encouraging my son not to go hang out with their neighbors because they weren't supporting yes on 8. These people are raised on bigotry in their church family.
__________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|