Pro-tax Occupation Protests Held Across U.S. (O.W.S. Thread) - Page 5 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:58 PM   #81
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,228
Local Time: 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by INDY500 View Post
This is still the winner.
You like wearing that 'Victim' sign don't you?
__________________

BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 06:52 PM   #82
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
The best sign I saw:

I'll Believe Corporations Are People When Texas Executes One
That is the best thing.
__________________

PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 08:59 PM   #83
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 27,406
Local Time: 08:52 AM
I guess the only thing worse than referencing your genitals is plagiarizing same. If you're going to make a sign about your balls at least make it original.

Tea Party — South DaCola

Best Tea Party Sign Evahh!

April 16th, 2009 — Tea Party



As for profanity, there are many kinds. Personally I prefer the f word and the word shit to something like this. And there are many other examples

MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 10:01 PM   #84
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 66,263
Local Time: 08:52 AM
The tea party is a group of people who started with a logical, debatable argument who's entire group has been overrun by radicals, racists and morons who draw all the attention away from the original point.

Occupy wall street is a group of people who started with a logical, debatable argument who's entire group has been overrun by radicals, anarchists and morons who draw all the attention away from the original point.

The only difference in the groups is that at the end of the day the tea party go home.
Headache in a Suitcase is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 01:43 AM   #85
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Canadiens1131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,363
Local Time: 09:52 AM
Canadiens1131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 08:36 AM   #86
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Tiger Edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Everglades
Posts: 4,740
Local Time: 09:52 AM
Tiger Edge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:15 AM   #87
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 27,406
Local Time: 08:52 AM
MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:21 AM   #88
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 27,406
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Report: Quarter of millionaires pay lower tax rate than some in middle class - The Washington Post
MrsSpringsteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 10:39 AM   #89
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,058
Local Time: 08:52 AM

at it's core, what i think this is about is the wildly concentration of wealth amongst the very, very top earners in the country.

it's nice to take the position that these people got rich through hard work, but that's not always the case. for every Bill Gates there's money that's inherited, and even more important, the last 30 years has seen the overtaking of the political system by these people via money to ensure that less money trickles down through government redistribution and more if it flows back to the very wealthy.

that's kind of inarguable. that's what's happened.

now, you could argue that if rich people have more money, if their capital gains are taxed at a lesser rate, then they will invest more money, more capital is freed up for ventures that will create jobs and the industries of the future, etc.

but that really hasn't been what's happened, has it?

meanwhile, real income is lower today than it was in 2000, and 50m people have gone without health care. i don't see how these are lesser priorities than lower taxes. it just boggles my mind.
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 11:43 AM   #90
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 09:52 AM
The rich do not invest in this country. They've in fact gone the other way and basically refused. It's an investment strike. When labor unions strike, it's the crumbling of civilization, but when investors strike, "It's their money, they can do what they want with it!"
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 02:40 PM   #91
Refugee
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: die for you baby, DIVE for you baby!
Posts: 1,480
Local Time: 08:52 AM
so what you are saying is capitalism eats itself.
canedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 02:57 PM   #92
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,058
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by canedge View Post
so what you are saying is capitalism eats itself.


unregulated capitalism, yes.

also, capitalism doesn't just happen. free markets are created and maintained, there's no magical, invisible hand that will solve all problems if we just get out of it's way.
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 04:17 PM   #93
Self-righteous bullshitter
 
BoMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan — Socialist paradise
Posts: 16,899
Local Time: 10:52 AM
Tensions At #OccupySesameStreet Are Heating Up (New Photoshops)
__________________

BoMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 07:01 PM   #94
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,058
Local Time: 08:52 AM
last night, Bill Clinton talked about harnessing the energy of OWS into coherency. this might be a place to start:

Quote:
My Advice to the Occupy Wall Street Protesters
Hit bankers where it hurts

By Matt Taibbi
October 12, 2011 8:00 AM ET


I've been down to "Occupy Wall Street" twice now, and I love it. The protests building at Liberty Square and spreading over Lower Manhattan are a great thing, the logical answer to the Tea Party and a long-overdue middle finger to the financial elite. The protesters picked the right target and, through their refusal to disband after just one day, the right tactic, showing the public at large that the movement against Wall Street has stamina, resolve and growing popular appeal.

But... there's a but. And for me this is a deeply personal thing, because this issue of how to combat Wall Street corruption has consumed my life for years now, and it's hard for me not to see where Occupy Wall Street could be better and more dangerous. I'm guessing, for instance, that the banks were secretly thrilled in the early going of the protests, sure they'd won round one of the messaging war.

Why? Because after a decade of unparalleled thievery and corruption, with tens of millions entering the ranks of the hungry thanks to artificially inflated commodity prices, and millions more displaced from their homes by corruption in the mortgage markets, the headline from the first week of protests against the financial-services sector was an old cop macing a quartet of college girls.

That, to me, speaks volumes about the primary challenge of opposing the 50-headed hydra of Wall Street corruption, which is that it's extremely difficult to explain the crimes of the modern financial elite in a simple visual. The essence of this particular sort of oligarchic power is its complexity and day-to-day invisibility: Its worst crimes, from bribery and insider trading and market manipulation, to backroom dominance of government and the usurping of the regulatory structure from within, simply can't be seen by the public or put on TV. There just isn't going to be an iconic "Running Girl" photo with Goldman Sachs, Citigroup or Bank of America – just 62 million Americans with zero or negative net worth, scratching their heads and wondering where the hell all their money went and why their votes seem to count less and less each and every year.

No matter what, I'll be supporting Occupy Wall Street. And I think the movement's basic strategy – to build numbers and stay in the fight, rather than tying itself to any particular set of principles – makes a lot of sense early on. But the time is rapidly approaching when the movement is going to have to offer concrete solutions to the problems posed by Wall Street. To do that, it will need a short but powerful list of demands. There are thousands one could make, but I'd suggest focusing on five:

1. Break up the monopolies. The so-called "Too Big to Fail" financial companies – now sometimes called by the more accurate term "Systemically Dangerous Institutions" – are a direct threat to national security. They are above the law and above market consequence, making them more dangerous and unaccountable than a thousand mafias combined. There are about 20 such firms in America, and they need to be dismantled; a good start would be to repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and mandate the separation of insurance companies, investment banks and commercial banks.

2. Pay for your own bailouts. A tax of 0.1 percent on all trades of stocks and bonds and a 0.01 percent tax on all trades of derivatives would generate enough revenue to pay us back for the bailouts, and still have plenty left over to fight the deficits the banks claim to be so worried about. It would also deter the endless chase for instant profits through computerized insider-trading schemes like High Frequency Trading, and force Wall Street to go back to the job it's supposed to be doing, i.e., making sober investments in job-creating businesses and watching them grow.

3. No public money for private lobbying. A company that receives a public bailout should not be allowed to use the taxpayer's own money to lobby against him. You can either suck on the public teat or influence the next presidential race, but you can't do both. Butt out for once and let the people choose the next president and Congress.

4. Tax hedge-fund gamblers.
For starters, we need an immediate repeal of the preposterous and indefensible carried-interest tax break, which allows hedge-fund titans like Stevie Cohen and John Paulson to pay taxes of only 15 percent on their billions in gambling income, while ordinary Americans pay twice that for teaching kids and putting out fires. I defy any politician to stand up and defend that loophole during an election year.

5. Change the way bankers get paid. We need new laws preventing Wall Street executives from getting bonuses upfront for deals that might blow up in all of our faces later. It should be: You make a deal today, you get company stock you can redeem two or three years from now. That forces everyone to be invested in his own company's long-term health – no more Joe Cassanos pocketing multimillion-dollar bonuses for destroying the AIGs of the world.

To quote the immortal political philosopher Matt Damon from Rounders, "The key to No Limit poker is to put a man to a decision for all his chips." The only reason the Lloyd Blankfeins and Jamie Dimons of the world survive is that they're never forced, by the media or anyone else, to put all their cards on the table. If Occupy Wall Street can do that – if it can speak to the millions of people the banks have driven into foreclosure and joblessness – it has a chance to build a massive grassroots movement. All it has to do is light a match in the right place, and the overwhelming public support for real reform – not later, but right now – will be there in an instant.

My Advice to the Occupy Wall Street Protesters | Politics News | Rolling Stone


and which of these demands would the Tea Party object to?

remember, the Tea Part started with TARP, back in 2008.
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 08:35 PM   #95
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,726
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Lech Walesa is flying to NYC to visit and participate in OWS.

The leader of the solidarity movement in Poland that contributed to the fall of Communism...watch the right now vilify him. Up until today he would have been a valiant freedom fighter against the Commies.
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 08:46 PM   #96
ONE
love, blood, life
 
financeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 10,122
Local Time: 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Lech Walesa is flying to NYC to visit and participate in OWS.

The leader of the solidarity movement in Poland that contributed to the fall of Communism...watch the right now vilify him. Up until today he would have been a valiant freedom fighter against the Commies.
This cannot be possibly correct, as it is just a bunch of privileged white hippy students causing aggro and stopping people going to work because the bums have nothing better to do.

There is no way a respected figure such as Walesa would support these ne'er do wells.
financeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:05 PM   #97
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 09:52 AM
Will there be an OWS when Walesa arrives?

CNN has breaking news that the protesters have to leave by 7am tomorrow. But the OWSers say they won't leave. Watch, there will be clashing and possible violence between the police and the protesters. Sigh.

Not that I believe all the protesters deliberately wanted violence from the start. I'm just saying its going to happen with the police forcing them to leave Zuccotti.
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:27 PM   #98
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
maycocksean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Most Important State in the Union
Posts: 4,892
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
last night, Bill Clinton talked about harnessing the energy of OWS into coherency. this might be a place to start:





and which of these demands would the Tea Party object to?

remember, the Tea Part started with TARP, back in 2008.
Normally Matt Taibbi irrates the hell out of me in his Rolling Stone diatribes, but this makes a lot of sense. I could get behind these suggestions!
maycocksean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:27 PM   #99
Refugee
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: die for you baby, DIVE for you baby!
Posts: 1,480
Local Time: 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by financeguy View Post
This cannot be possibly correct, as it is just a bunch of privileged white hippy students causing aggro and stopping people going to work because the bums have nothing better to do.
I don't think you know just how evil and all-pervasive US capitalism is. I support these young people who are trying to right a system that has really gone too far.
canedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2011, 09:30 PM   #100
Blue Crack Addict
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 28,354
Local Time: 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by canedge View Post
I don't think you know just how evil and all-pervasive capitalism is. I support these young people who are trying to right a system that has really gone too far.
efa
__________________

Vlad n U 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×