Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
That doesn’t make any sense at all.
Ok, I'm responding to this nonsense because Headache is waiting for me too. You are proving my point, so not enough people died in this tragedy for you? So you only talk about "saving the children" and "school shooting" when ten or more die? 20?
That's disgraceful. Either you are outraged by gun violence or you're not. You're proving my point, since only a few died, an "assault rifle" wasn't used, and one of the millions of NRA "white nationalists" wasn't the shooter, you don't care.
Welcome to the Democrat Party.
Ok, I'm responding to this nonsense because Headache is waiting for me too. You are proving my point, so not enough people died in this tragedy for you? So you only talk about "saving the children" and "school shooting" when ten or more die? 20?
That's disgraceful. Either you are outraged by gun violence or you're not. You're proving my point, since only a few died, an "assault rifle" wasn't used, and one of the millions of NRA "white nationalists" wasn't the shooter, you don't care.
Welcome to the Democrat Party.
Tell me how many people died in California yesterday during this incident and then please go pull up the number of people who die in incidents where the perpetrator uses an “assault rifle” and then please get back to me.
Welcome to the Democrat Party.
More people die in a single mass incident when the criminal uses a semi-automatic rifle, with large clips and/or clips that can be modified to be even larger without much effort. Or so I've read.
But I think we're all aware of the deaths by handguns, due to suicide and due to criminality. Gun violence due to a handgun dwarfs everything else, easily. By tens of thousands. Is that what Gzusfrk is getting at?
And there's little appetite to ban handguns in the states, regardless of party.
Ok, I'm responding to this nonsense because Headache is waiting for me too. You are proving my point, so not enough people died in this tragedy for you? So you only talk about "saving the children" and "school shooting" when ten or more die? 20?
That's disgraceful. Either you are outraged by gun violence or you're not. You're proving my point, since only a few died, an "assault rifle" wasn't used, and one of the millions of NRA "white nationalists" wasn't the shooter, you don't care.
Welcome to the Democrat Party.
I STILL marvel at the hypocrisy in this place where as soon as the gun control virtue signalers hear that the shooter wasn’t white, didn’t use an “assault rifle “, is in the liberal haven of California with strict gun laws......there is radio silence. Doesn’t fit the liberal narrative. Same with the Democratic politicians. They only care about victims when they can use it politically.
Nobody mentioned the backyard shooting in California yesterday at the football viewing party.
Probably cause nobody in LA cares about the Rams and by extension their fans.
Shooting at a Walmart in Oklahoma.
Not sure if the right weapon or number of casualties yet so unclear if it meets gzus' standards of whether or not I should care yet.
Oh. In that case I don't care. Cause gzus
remind me again please why civilians absolutely need to carry these things around in america?
2nd amendment
right to self defense
Welcome back old friend.
I do believe the question was actually why people need to carry, not what grants them the gray area right to do so.
Again, self defense.
My question is why leftists feel the need to want to take guns away from law-abiding, responsible citizens....
Because if you have guns we can’t abort babies to troll you.
My question is why are you asking a question if the way you’ve asked it indicates you don’t want an answer?
Wow nice illogical attempt at humor there....
My question is why are you dodging the question by misdirecting with another question?
Because you’re asking a question that’s been answered a million times in a way that indicates you will not listen, as you’ve stated your biases from within your question.
Item 1: usage of the term “leftists” which by many definitions is a generally meaningless term used in attempts to disparage from the right
Item 2: indicating these “leftists” want to take away guns from “law abiding citizens.”
My question is why do you think you’ve posed your question in a way that is inviting or worthy of an answer?
who the fuck left this noisy squawking parrot in here?
imagine having such a sad boring life that a fun way for you to spend a monday evening is to create a troll login for a mostly-dead U2 message board just to angrily shout at people.