Murdoch empire in crisis

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
We're learning more about the culture that operated in the NOTW newsdesks - a culture of intense pressure and bullying, by the look of things.


The pressure on journalists at the paper to satisfy the demands of the editor was immense, says Mr McMullan. These demands ranged from requiring groundbreaking stories to ridiculous requests made for the amusement of executives. On 9/11, Mrs Brooks demanded a reporter, who had been designated the News of the World’s Harry Potter correspondent wear his costume for her and Mr Coulson’s amusement. The reporter refused, believing it was in poor taste, and later quit.

But the pressures to produce exclusive stories conspired to create the collapse.

“The people who did the hacking were driven to it,” said one source. “The pressure is massive. It’s endless. If you don’t produce stories you’re abused in conference and threatened with dismissal.” Mulcaire, who said he was under strain to justify the £10,000 a month he was being paid, began to hack mobile phones on an industrial scale. At first, the hacking was used as a secondary tool, a means, said a source, of “filtering out” the hundreds of tips that would be rung in to the newsdesk.


The pressure on journalists at the paper to satisfy the demands of the editor was immense, says Mr McMullan. These demands ranged from requiring groundbreaking stories to ridiculous requests made for the amusement of executives. On 9/11, Mrs Brooks demanded a reporter, who had been designated the News of the World’s Harry Potter correspondent wear his costume for her and Mr Coulson’s amusement. The reporter refused, believing it was in poor taste, and later quit.

But the pressures to produce exclusive stories conspired to create the collapse.

“The people who did the hacking were driven to it,” said one source. “The pressure is massive. It’s endless. If you don’t produce stories you’re abused in conference and threatened with dismissal.” Mulcaire, who said he was under strain to justify the £10,000 a month he was being paid, began to hack mobile phones on an industrial scale. At first, the hacking was used as a secondary tool, a means, said a source, of “filtering out” the hundreds of tips that would be rung in to the newsdesk.


Phone hacking: Swagger that sowed the seeds of destruction - Telegraph
 
NOTW reporters may have tried to hack 9/11 victims

DESPERATE Rupert Murdoch yesterday flew to London to try to save his crumbling empire.

He arrived in a cowboy-style hat to be hit by claims News of the World reporters hacked the phones of 9/11 victims.

Murdoch held talks with News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks, amid fears nine staff and three cops may face jail.

--------------------------------------------

HIS media empire is crashing around him, he’s just shut down a scandal-hit newspaper and his BSkyB bid is in tatters, but Rupert Murdoch still came out grinning yesterday.

And this cosy picture of him giving his backing to smiling Rebekah Brooks will no doubt infuriate the 200 loyal staff at the defunct News of the World who were sacrificed while she clung to her job.

As Labour leader Ed Miliband vowed to scupper Mr Murdoch’s bid to own all of BSkyB, the News Corp boss seemed to brush off his troubles to joke with the under-fire News International chief executive – who was editor when murdered teenager Milly Dowler’s phone was hacked. Asked what his first priority was, he gestured at Mrs Brooks and said: “This one.”

Mr Murdoch arrived in London yesterday, wearing a Panama hat and clutching a final copy of the News of the World, in a bid to save his crumbling organisation after the phone-hacking scandal saw the 168-year-old paper axed.

But he flew straight into another storm as it was claimed 9/11 victims may have had their mobiles tapped by News of the World reporters. And there was more bad news when it was revealed nine reporters allegedly at the centre of the phone scandal and claims of police corruption could face jail, along with three officers.

After he spent time at News International’s Wapping HQ in East London, 80-year-old Mr Murdoch held crisis talks with Mrs Brooks, 43 - who denies any knowledge of the Milly phone tapping - at his home in Mayfair.

The pair chatted behind closed doors as a former New York cop made the 9/11 hacking claim. He alleged he was contacted by News of the World journalists who said they would pay him to retrieve the private phone records of the dead.

Now working as a private investigator, the ex-officer claimed reporters wanted the victim’s phone numbers and details of the calls they had made and received in the days leading up to the atrocity.

A source said: “This investigator is used by a lot of journalists in America and he recently told me that he was asked to hack into the 9/11 victims’ private phone data. He said that the journalists asked him to access records showing the calls that had been made to and from the mobile phones belonging to the victims and their relatives.

“His presumption was that they wanted the information so they could hack into the relevant voicemails, just like it has been shown they have done in the UK. The PI said he had to turn the job down. He knew how insensitive such research would be, and how bad it would look.

“The investigator said the journalists seemed particularly interested in getting the phone records belonging to the British victims of the attacks.”

No way it could have gone on this long without knowledge.
 
In the next hour ex-PM Gordon Brown is apparently going to unleash hell on the Sunday Times, making them 'the centre of the story'. That would be very interesting, as they're, obviously, not easy to brush off as a trashy tabloid gone rogue or whatever. Could say a lot about the News Corp 'news' attitude and culture across the board, but let's wait and see...

Also people starting to speculate that News Corp might dump News Intl. (UK newspaper arm) all together. If so, not sure what value there would be in it. The Sun performs well but is definitely on the downward as all print media is, and The Times loses £45m a year, was subsided by Sun/News of the World.
 
Also, loads of speculation over what both Rebekah Brooks meant when she told staff that the worst was yet to come, alongside similar hints from other media/politicians who seem to perhaps have visibility to things they can't for legal reasons mention right now. Guesses on "How could it possibly get worse than it is?" include...
- Something national security related.
- Or something otherwise directly related to loss of life (although its well known that they've hounded people to suicide before, so they've already got that one on the books really.)
- Something that rockets this across the Atlantic. You match this anger and atmosphere in the US, and the Murdochs (if not News Corp) are toast.
- Something related to Diana. That sounds like not much of a leap from already existing revelations, but for the Murdoch-tabloid key demographic, it certainly is.
- Or she's just talking about what we expect, that as the criminal side of this plays out (police corruption, executive obstruction/perjury etc) it's just going to get shittier and shittier. It certainly does however sound like it's less this, and there more revelations to come.
 
Background for Brown stuff here, but he's talking to the press in the next hour: News International papers targeted Gordon Brown | Media | guardian.co.uk

And Murdoch has said they are not going to spin off Sky News from BSkyB anymore - that was what they needed to do to satisfy regulators that they could own BSkyB without having too much influence. So this is a sign that he's intending to dump other assets - ie, he is going to dump *all* the newspapers.
 
It looks like while Rebekah was being friends with Gordon Brown and his wife, NI was hacking into phones to learn about the Browns' son who is ill. Nice friend, right?

I'm not at all surprised by the reports about the bullying at NOTW. The news business is filled with that. I used to work full time in the field and saw a lot of people literally willing to kill for a story or to be promoted. The term cut throat is not to be taken lightly there.
 
Not phone hacking, but theft of medical records. They ran with this story as Gordon Brown and his wife were coming to terms with the illness themselves. And you can still see The Sun boasting about breaking that 'cracking' story on their website here: Print Friendly Page Presumably this link will be taken down soon...

Absolute fuckwits.
 
7.22pm: Sarah Brown has been using twitter to comment on the Guardian's report that journalists from across News International repeatedly targeted her husband, attempting to access his voicemail and obtaining information from his bank account and the family's medical records.

She tweets here:

so sad to learn all I am about my family's privacy - it is very personal and really hurtful if all true #notw et al

and here:

Thanks for your thoughtful messages this eve, really appreciated. Thinking of other families affected who did not ask to be in public eye.

Phone-hacking scandal – latest developments | Media | guardian.co.uk
 
BSkyB bid withdrawn. That means he can't try again for six months. I'd be amazed if they don't try again - News Corps entire future is based on deals like this - and that this isn't about just turning the heat off. Six months where people aren't screaming about it. Six months to sell off the newspaper business to clear the ownership hurdles. Six months for people to get bored of slow-dragging commissions and whatnot. Six months to shake up the executive level of News Corp. But at the same time, definitely looks like the heat is trying to be turned on in the US? Will it ignite? Whether or not the charges extend to the US arm of the business, the parent company is US based and there are pretty strong laws there relating to how US companies behave overseas, and this story kind of hits a jackpot in terms of doing everything wrong, and goes straight to cross-Atlantic executives.
 
I thought Murdoch makes the big money with Hollywood movies, not with the bloody UK tabloids?
 
Content AND distribution together are where he makes his coin. So a mix of owning things like 20th Century Fox, Fox TV studios, shitloads of sports rights, and then the channels in the middle (Fox, Fox News etc), and then the cable/satellite networks that broadcast them. So no, the print media side doesn't make money anymore (or very little.) It's long been said that the wider News Corp executives (and shareholders) would love to see them get out of print altogether, but that's what Murdoch started with and built off and it's a personal affection thing (and newspapers are still his key to political persuasion and power, particularly in the UK and Australia.) Everyone has always expected News Corp to sell all their newspapers off the morning after Murdoch either retires or dies. So being forced to do it now won't be such a big deal.

But that's why the BSkyB bid was important. Without getting it (and there's a slim chance he might lose all of it) they've got no future in the UK, and it's a significant hit for News Corp globally. It's a huge hole in the network. The wider public victory is about that influence - too much influence, and it's a corrupt influence too. But... this surely won't be the end of News Corp trying to get BSkyB. They'll definitely try again. Might just not be with a Murdoch running the show.
 
I don't have much to comment on (yet) in this story. But thanks, FG and Ernie, for keeping us up to date. Good analysis. :up:
 
I don't have much to comment on (yet) in this story. But thanks, FG and Ernie, for keeping us up to date. Good analysis. :up:

I am hoping that you will comment on this at some stage as I'd be interested in your take.
 
Lulzsec have hacked News International's DNS servers and all 1,024 web addresses are down.
 
What a strange day. Two of Britain's most senior policemen resign, then news of the whistleblower's death. That much is fact. Then, all kinds of theories about the guy being whacked and the Lulzsec hack attack being revenge for this. Speculations about Murdoch about to reveal things about 9/11 to hit back.

They're saying now Cameron is in big trouble, but surely a lot of it will reflect badly on the Labour party too?
 
After weeks of hue and cry about the Murdoch gate there seems to be a prevalent unwritten agreement among the British main stream media to ignore a fact.

While the British ordinary citizens are buried under piles of news about Murdoch’s empire hacking into the voicemails of the royal family , celebrities, high-ranking politicians, a murdered teenager and the relatives of the dead soldiers , almost all media fail to report Murdoch’s worst allegation : the endorsement of illegal war in Iraq.

Media observers accuse Murdoch’s newspapers of being the main newspaper propagandizing the fraudulent military conflicts.

The media tycoon had given his full support to the illegal Iraq war, and many times praised former Prime Minister Tony Blair for his courage saying: “I think Tony is being extraordinarily courageous and strong on what his stance is in the Middle East.”

News International papers began doing their best convincing people about what they called the grave threat of Saddam Hussein weapons, even two years before the publication of the government’s dossier on Iraq’s non-existent Weapon of Mass Destruction.

As the UK government was beating the drums of the war louder in 2003 , Murdoch’s newspaper initiated even more pro-war propaganda. Murdoch who was the strong supporter of attacking Iraq and ousting Saddam, even said:”The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy, if you could put it that way, would be $20 a barrel for oil. That’s bigger than any tax cut in the any country.” However after the invasion News International never apologized for the false information they had published pushing the economy to the brink of collapse.

Murdoch’s papers and TV channels have been backing all the wars imposed by the Britain in the last thirty years and has continued backing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Murdoch’s media empire has even prepared the ground to keep the war in Libya going.

One may ask which one is more guilty? The Murdoch’s corporation or the other British media which are deliberately turning a close eye to his roles in recent wars?


Prison Planet.com ? UK media ignore Murdoch role in Iraq war
 
To be fair, even in Britain, there were certainly those who would've gone along with the war in Iraq whether anyone believed in "the grave threat of Saddam Hussein's weapons" or not. Still, it's pretty disturbing to consider what these revelations suggest about just how powerful a sanction corporate media massage has become for leaders contemplating hugely fateful decisions.
 
It does (or should) reflect just as badly on Labour. Blair-era particularly. In terms of ugliness, Thatcher/Blair/Cameron are all pretty even really. And that's not buried or anything, it is coming up a lot. It probably will more-so when this moves on from the 'current' story, and into the various commissions and whatnot, and moves away from the criminal and into the simply 'not cool' side of the influence. It has been hinted at for a while that there's plenty on Blair/Bush/Murdoch/Iraq to come out, but I'm not sure if it will now while the focus is on hacking/corruption.

Labour have to be careful though. So far they're dancing on what is a pretty thin line fairly successfully, but they could easily misjudge the public mood. It's not a left/right political thing, so while people are pissed with Cameron over his relationship with News Intl, his hiring of Coulson and refusal to admit it was such a huge mistake (and/or refusing to come clean about the circumstances surrounding his hiring), and the way he's quite obviously deliberately trying to lay as low as he possibly can during this, it would be a huge mistake for Labour to push too hard against him, and make it too nakedly party political. They get pretty close to crossing that line. I think Cameron is in a lot of trouble here, but his quickest way out of it will be if Labour push too hard.

Also, can't believe I'm genuinely quite excited about watching a Parliamentary committee hearing? Hope the MP's get it right.
 
Back
Top Bottom