Ever wondered what would happen if a nuke hit your city? Wonder no more!

[DaveC]

NUKEMAP by Alex Wellerstein

This is some frightening shit.

At least if a nuke goes off in downtown Toronto, I'm probably safe at home so long as it's under 5 kilotons or so. At work, I shall become a fine powder of ash. Hooray for avoiding radiation poisoning at least?

[nbelcik]

I've been on this site before, the Tsar Bomba is the scariest one.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[LemonMelon]

It would take a 3 Mt explosive in downtown LA to reach where I live, so that's comforting. 50 Mt in downtown Chicago might reach my in-laws.

[Galeongirl]

Pretty mad stuff!

[cobl04]

Crazy. And now you've sent me down a wikipedia rabbit hole.

[DaveC]

Originally Posted by cobl04

Crazy. And now you've sent me down a wikipedia rabbit hole.

Yep, same thing happened to me.

This is a pretty cool video that shows all nuclear explosions, ever, plotted on a map (although it's kind of infuriatingly long). I had no idea that the UK once nuked Australia, although you guys probably deserved it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

[Oregoropa]

I played around with 100t terrorist bomb. Scary.

For high score hit Tokyo with tsar bomba.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[dazzledbylight]

Originally Posted by cobl04

Crazy. And now you've sent me down a wikipedia rabbit hole.

oh no, cobl!

Well, being in mah early 60's and a Born & Bred Lifelong NYC'r we he-ah in nyc have had a Big Ole "Ground Zero" Sign on our backsides since The Cold War; waaaay before 9-11! So i've seen our circles of destruction charts if a nuke was dropped on The Empire State Building since the 60's
And "thanks a lot" fuckin' Putin for reviving those bad memories a bit

[corianderstem]

In Hilarious (But Sad) Old Fox News Watching White Man News, my 70 year old dad says he worries about me living in Seattle, because he's pretty sure there'll be nuclear war soon.

But, he then mused, I wouldn't be much safer in my podunk Wisconsin home town because there's a really big power plant there or something. So, you know, totally a target.

I am almost 42 years old, and I struggled really hard not to roll my eyes at my dad like I was 30 years younger.

Re that link Dave posted, though? Thank you, but no.

[Mack_Again]

Nuclear bombs hit my country twice already so yeah, wut up, people?

[nbelcik]

Originally Posted by Mack_Again

Nuclear bombs hit my country twice already so yeah, wut up, people?

Yeah, sorry about the war crimes we committed against your country. We should have never used them.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Oregoropa]

The invasion of Japan would have cost the USA a million soldiers and 4 million Japanese. The firebombing of Japanese cities killed far more than the two nukes. The Japanese regime was committed to total warfare using civilians as suicide weapons to slow down GIs

Hiroshima and Nagasaki although killing civilians, saved the lives of many more by shocking the fanatical high command into surrender.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[nbelcik]

Any action where the majority of those killed are civilians are war crimes. And both sides during WWII committed them, even though one side was significantly more evil.

Japan surrendered because the Soviets entered the war. The leadership just simply did not care about civilian casualties, but they did care about obtaining favorable terms of surrender and hoped that the Soviets would help them reach an agreement with the US. But once the Soviets invaded Manchuria, that hope died.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Oregoropa]

Soviets ha.they could roll into manchukoku Kuril Islands and Korea, but lacked the naval logistics to invade the home islands. It was little boy and fat man. That shocked the Japanese system.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[bobsaget77]

The Japanese only committed a couple hundred war crimes during WW2. But just small stuff like raping thousands of women and children, using some of the most brutal torture tactics known to man, eating human flesh, supporting the jewish holocaust, committing an Asian holocaust, siding with Hitler, bombing our homeland, burying people alive, massacring 300,000 civilians in China, abducting women for sex slavery, scientific human experiments including amputations and dissection without amnesia, and killing over 400,000 more Asians with biological warfare. Sometimes you have to do what is necessary to end evil. Millions more would have died if not for the atom bomb.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[DaveC]

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

bombing our homeland

Yeah this is where you lost me. Pearl Harbor was a direct attack on a military facility. The Americans dropped incendiary bombs across multiple cities indiscriminately. There's no effing way any sane person could consider Pearl Harbor a war crime and the firebombing of Tokyo or Dresden not to be.

Originally Posted by bobsaget77

raping thousands of women and children, using some of the most brutal torture tactics known to man, burying people alive, massacring ... civilians, abducting women for sex slavery, and killing ... with biological warfare.

All atrocities the United States military is also just as guilty of, if not more so, over the course of history.

[nbelcik]

And their argument is that since the other side killed civilians and committed atrocities, then our side should be allowed to kill civilians and commit atrocities...


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[BVS]

It's amazing how one of the first wars thoroughly documented in motion picture and recorded by "modern" media methods can still be SO revisionist.

Makes you wonder how much of history we have absolutely wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[nbelcik]

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/...an-stalin-did/


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

[Oregoropa]

Originally Posted by DaveC

Yeah this is where you lost me. Pearl Harbor was a direct attack on a military facility. The Americans dropped incendiary bombs across multiple cities indiscriminately. There's no effing way any sane person could consider Pearl Harbor a war crime and the firebombing of Tokyo or Dresden not to be.



All atrocities the United States military is also just as guilty of, if not more so, over the course of history.

World War II was nasty. But on the whole, the Allied powers were more restrained (USSR excluded-Considering captured German soldiers were sent to gulags where their death rate was 90%)

As for the firebombings, The Japanese were committed to total warfare. The Rape of Nanking, Unit 731, horrible treatment and execution of prisoners of war. They were designed to break the Japanese will to fight and have their leadership to collapse. Same thing with Dresden. To your point yes, the USA does have blood on their hands with civilian deaths. But compared to what Germany and Japan did to civilians it pales in comparison.

I will even acknowledge that the 'Japs' were so dissimilar to the US culturally at the time that the firebombings didn't phase many military men. Up to that point the US had only known brutality from the Japanese. So yes there is a racial component. The US was more akin to Europe culturally so we didn't mass firebomb the Germans, many who had relatives in the US. And pilots were given instructions to avoid spots of cultural significance such as Koln Cathedral.