Christians are Compassionate

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

A_Wanderer

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
12,518
Location
The Wild West
Christopher Hitchens, the famous atheist and author of “God is Not Great,” abruptly cut short a book tour this week to begin chemotherapy treatments, and news outlets reported that he has cancer.

It seems against common sense to say this, but might I suggest that this turn of events shows that God is kind even to those who spend their lives fighting against him.


How does that make sense? And how does my suggestion show any compassion? I’ll explain in a moment. But first, Hitchens’ announcement:
“I have been advised by my physician that I must undergo a course of chemotherapy on my esophagus,” Hitchens, 61, said. “This advice seems persuasive to me. I regret having had to cancel so many engagements at such short notice.”

In response, I would like to extend my heartfelt empathy to Hitchens. Whatever his (or your) thoughts on the afterlife (or lack thereof), chemotherapy is no fun, and he’s facing a rough road ahead. Almost no one is exempt from troubles in this life.

Christopher Hitchens would probably hate me for saying this (or merely pity me for being a deluded rube), but I’d like to ask believers to pray for him.
Interestingly, Hitchens’ brother, Peter Hitchens, two months ago published a rebuttal to Christopher Hitchens’ long-held denial of God. A former atheist and recently converted Christian, Peter Hitchens has released “The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith.”
Wouldn’t you like to listen in on those family discussions?

But to our question: how can cancer be an example of God’s grace to this suddenly stricken intellectual, who has made a career of arguing the case for atheism? A cancer which God didn’t “give,” but certainly permitted.

The short answer is this: if God really wanted to “get” Hitchens, God would just ignore the man, and let him go his blissful way, unchallenged, to a peaceful death.

At which point Hitchens would stand, face-to-face and unreconciled, with that very God.

Of course, Hitchens doesn’t believe a word of that scenario I just outlined. He might explain that he is, after all, a heavy smoker. And in his 2008 book, “god is not Great,” Hitchens goes to exceptional lengths to explain why he rejects theistic belief.

Now, Hitchens, who also writes on other topics, is a smart guy. In addition to writing books, he is a contributing editor for Atlantic magazine and a columnist for Vanity Fair.

Unfortunately, a lot of Hitchens’ non-belief has a whiff of the village atheist about it. First off, there’s the title of his best-known anti-God book: “god is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.” Why the little “g” for God? It’s his name, after all, and we capitalize proper names. The little “g” feels like the gratuitous disrespect rebellious small children are fond of.
And does religion really poison … everything? For example, I’m not really fond of rock music, but even that is not all bad.

As with many atheists, Hitchens’ non-belief got its start in childhood, when he heard a religious person say something that, even to a child, came across as dumb. With Hitchens’s mentor, it was something about the color of the sky and human eyeballs.

For me, there’s something inane about an adult beginning to base their adult worldview on something wacko recalled from childhood.
But now, let’s talk, one grownup to another.

To illustrate why Hitchens’ getting cancer is an example of God’s grace, let me point to an example from the movies, a mafia movie. The example is fiction, but well-known, and similar circumstances are played out in real life every day.

The aged Don Corleone, the godfather, is playing in the garden with his grandchild. After a life at the head of a criminal enterprise, he is a survivor, basking in the sun with family at the end of a long and happy life. Suddenly, he keels over, and the frolicking toddler is unaware that the grandfather has just died.

I’ll wager that the director was making a comment that this man’s life, wicked by some estimates, ended well. After all, the Don didn’t really “pay” for his alleged sins.

But from a biblical perspective, that quiet death is the very worst thing that could happen to the Don. He has slipped into eternity unreconciled to God.
It is a cliché that there are no atheists in foxholes -- or in cancer wards. It is a cliché because, human nature being what it is, there is a lot of truth to it. People do tend to wait until they are in big trouble (foxholes) or until the last minute (cancer wards) before they get serious about spiritual, end-of-life, matters.

But better to suffer for a season now, as a prod to get serious, than to go the way of Don Corleone.

Atheism is a fun game (and profitable, too) when you’re healthy, because there are no really serious consequences. No so when you might be terminally ill, because then you’re about to make an eternal bet.

Hitchens is a talented and creative writer. But I suspect that it is precisely his talent and creativity – and his awareness of his talent – that may make it especially difficult for him to fess up: maybe there is a God. (Of course, I don’t know that he will “fess up.”)

After all, how cliché would it be for Hitchens, a lifelong atheist, to undergo a “deathbed” conversion. Please! That’s a late-night television movie plot.
It would be a huge blow to Hitchens’ ego (as it is to any ego) to admit that he’s been wrong these many years. But Hitchens’ rebellion against God has been so public that God may require a very public humbling.

But maybe God is doing it this way because he desires that Hitchens give up his “god,” that is, Hitchens’ pride in being different from the run-of-the-mill mortal. Maybe God is doing it this way so that Hitchens can encounter the God he has been denying for so long, before eternity sets in.
God is great to Christopher Hitchens | NJ.com

There are plenty of examples of nonbelievers standing by their principles until the end, and I suspect that Hitchens will provide another one (hopefully later rather than sooner).
 
But Hitchens’ rebellion against God has been so public that God may require a very public humbling.

This is why I find it increasingly difficult not to depise Christians as people (as opposed to just scorning the ideology).
 
Whenever I read an article which says atheists are "arrogant" I think about who's making the accusation.

Condescension and hypocrisy are a potent mix
For me, there’s something inane about an adult beginning to base their adult worldview on something wacko recalled from childhood. But now, let’s talk, one grownup to another.
 
Plenty of real world examples of compassionate, generous Christians -- no need to make this editorial the barometer.

There are plenty of condescending, arrogant Christians out there, but there are plenty of condescending, arrogant atheists out there as well.
 
Why the little “g” for God? It’s his name, after all, and we capitalize proper names. The little “g” feels like the gratuitous disrespect rebellious small children are fond of.

I often use the word "God" in a sentence with the lower-case spelling, like when saying, "Oh, my god". No disrespect intended, just don't really think about it *Shrugs*. There's lots of people who type names of others, real or "possibly" real, out online without proper capitalization (or punctuation, or spelling, or what have you). So explain that? Hitchens, given his enthusiasm for atheism, may possibly be doing it for rebellious purposes in a way, but who knows, why make that sort of assumption, really?

Yeah, I have a REALLY hard time believing God (ooh! See? Capitalized it there!) gave him cancer as a means to bring him to reconciliation. That just seems a rather cruel method of getting somebody's attention. And to go with the Corleone example used, well, why didn't God get that guy's attention, too, with some illness or whatever? Why did he wind up dead without making spiritual amends, but Hitchens is getting his "second chance" (and yes, I know that one's a character in a film and the other's a real-life person, but there's lots of real world "Corleone"s out there, so to speak, so my question still stands)?

When I come across arguments this confusing and illogical, it makes me think the Hitchenses of the world have a point. I have much respect for people being as religious as they please, it's your life, to each their own and hooray to you for finding spiritual comfort and guidance, but seriously, I'd like to ask them to try and listen to themselves the next time they talk like this. They may mean well, I have no doubt this guy does wish good thoughts for the man in his plight (as do I, I'm very sorry to hear of his cancer battle, and I hope he fights the good fight and gets better), but that article seems a bit...unintentionally condescending, and is just full of arguments that don't hold a lot of weight.

Angela
 
God is great to Christopher Hitchens | NJ.com

There are plenty of examples of nonbelievers standing by their principles until the end, and I suspect that Hitchens will provide another one (hopefully later rather than sooner).

As a Christian, I'm quite embarrassed by that article. The word that came to mind while reading it was smug.

Also, I totally disagree with the analysis of Don Coerleone's death. I think view it as a statement about how in the end, even someone with the kind of power Coerleone had could come to an end in such a helpless and humbling way. After all the violence of his life, ironically, he went out without any kind of blaze of glory. I never got the sense that the message was supposed to be: "See he got away with it."

This is why I find it increasingly difficult not to depise Christians as people (as opposed to just scorning the ideology).

I had no idea you felt this way. I always thought we got alonag alright. :wink:
 
God is great to Christopher Hitchens | NJ.com

There are plenty of examples of nonbelievers standing by their principles until the end, and I suspect that Hitchens will provide another one (hopefully later rather than sooner).

I don't know. I am a 14 year cancer survivor, and at first, i thught, I better pray for my life . Instead I got this very calm feeling, to just do what I have to and not worry, so i didnt.

I cant say I saw God, but some of the people I would randomly come across just blew me away by their care, and just talking. I had a lot of strange things that happened over that time, from strangers , and it dawned on me that this wasn't coincedence .

The best one, is i was in another city for treatment , and I walked around a corner and someone yelled my name. That was amazing in itself, as I was bald, swollen from steroids etc, and this nurse that yelled my name across a crowded lobby was an ex-girlfriend from when i was 16. To me, I thought what are the odds of that?

Cancer changes you in many ways . Sprituality, whatever that means to an individual, was something heard from other patients over and over.

I saw it in strangers everywhere. So MY conclusion was that it had always been there, things had just blocked it from the plain view that I have carried since. Meaning, whatever it is, I see it all the time now.

1 cycle I think it said he had to have. That is hopefull for him to recover. No smoking though.
 
I agree with Maycocksean. The article does sound like the author is glad Hitchens has cancer. I wouldn't wish cancer on anyone and I'm a Christian :)

Honestly, when an atheist angrily rants about theism and religion, I do feel anger towards that person because what they are saying is so hateful. But at the end, you really have to feel sorry for the person. He or she is so consumed with their anger towards theists and theism that they become such nasty people. I prefer talking about theology with the so-called "friendly atheists" rather than the New Atheists since the latter usually are what I just described.
 
I agree with Maycocksean. The article does sound like the author is glad Hitchens has cancer. I wouldn't wish cancer on anyone and I'm a Christian :)

Honestly, when an atheist angrily rants about theism and religion, I do feel anger towards that person because what they are saying is so hateful. But at the end, you really have to feel sorry for the person. He or she is so consumed with their anger towards theists and theism that they become such nasty people. I prefer talking about theology with the so-called "friendly atheists" rather than the New Atheists since the latter usually are what I just described.


I have often thought that atheists are angry( not all, but seems like many ) because they lack anything that gives them faith. Faith, be it a door knob, or something else is an essential emotional element. If one has no faith, is there hope? Everyone has to believe in something, be it yourself, or whatever they choose.

The hate.... I can't stand. Hate is anger. If someone is angry , it usually means somethings missing, or one goes into the other emotions that result from Hate or anger. I wouldnt want to live that way. From what I have experienced and see, I couldn't.
 
I would recommend the last chapter of God is not Great for its wonderful humanist appeal to the consolations of philosophy, art and science but it's probably too hateful.
 
Perhaps another instance of what makes atheists so darn angry
Police investigating claims of child abuse by Belgian clergy have told the BBC they are probing death threats against witnesses and magistrates.

Last month police raided a meeting of Belgium's Catholic bishops as part of their investigation, seizing computers and documents.

They even searched the tomb of at least one cardinal, prompting an angry response from the Vatican.

The country is one of several where the Church has been shaken by abuse claims.

The investigation into child abuse allegations in Belgium's Catholic Church has already prompted extraordinary scenes, says the BBC's Dominic Hughes in Brussels.

But now the investigation has taken an unexpected turn.

Officials say that police are also looking into threats to the lives of some witnesses and magistrates connected to the case.

Jean Marc Meillure, a spokesman for the public prosecutors office, confirmed that an investigation was under way.

"There are some threats against certain people around the case, and the prosecutors office is investigating that," he told the BBC.

He said the threats had been made against people who gave the authorities information or made a complaint, or against some magistrates.


The raid last month on the offices of a Church commission investigating the abuse claims led to some of the country's leading clergy being detained for nine hours.

Police took away their mobile telephones to prevent them communicating with their staff or with the Vatican.

They were also reported to have drilled into the tomb of at a former Belgian cardinal at the cathedral in Mechelen during what seems to have been a frenetic search for possible incriminating documents.

Officers also raided the nearby home of the recently retired archbishop of Belgium, Cardinal Godfried Danneels, seizing paperwork and his computer.

The allegations of child abuse by priests in Belgium are just the latest in a string of similar cases that have hit the Catholic Church in Europe and North America.
BBC News - Belgian child sex abuse police probe death threats

I know it's really narrow minded of me to have a problem with this. Those freedom fighters are acting without the consent of holy mother church, and it can't be pinned on the vatican.

I implore all atheists to show more respect to these institutions. Getting angry about petty things like child rape is a sure sign of fundamentalism, and it makes you just as bad as suicide bombers.

Belgium is a Stalinist regime that is enforcing state atheism by looking into these claims and holding a church to relativist human standards.
 
I have often thought that atheists are angry( not all, but seems like many ) because they lack anything that gives them faith. Faith, be it a door knob, or something else is an essential emotional element. If one has no faith, is there hope? Everyone has to believe in something, be it yourself, or whatever they choose.

The hate.... I can't stand. Hate is anger. If someone is angry , it usually means somethings missing, or one goes into the other emotions that result from Hate or anger. I wouldnt want to live that way. From what I have experienced and see, I couldn't.
This is an incredibly poor post. Just no basis in reality at all. This reads like a kneejerk reaction without any thought. Not even an attempt to understand another point of view.
 
Perhaps another instance of what makes atheists so darn angryBBC News - Belgian child sex abuse police probe death threats

YES.

Course, I should think anyone, religious (doesn't matter which god(s) you pray to), agnostic, or atheist, that is sane and has anything resembling a brain would be offended by this. Anyone who isn't, well, they're obviously the cause of the problem.

I can't speak for all atheists, some may rant out of prejudice towards theists or because they're deeply insecure about their beliefs or whatever, but I honestly think most atheists' rants are born out of frustration at how otherwise intelligent people will be stupid enough to be willing to believe and do certain things all in the name of some god(s) that may or may not exist. It really is mind-blowingly insane some of the stuff you can convince people to do because some being in the sky supposedly said you should do it. Those that blindly follow, there's no questioning, there's no hesitation, there's no, "Uh, yeah, this is cruel and I won't be party to it", they just go, "Okay" and do it. Shoot first, ask questions later. Not the way I'd suggest living life, but that's just me.

Angela
 
I see nothing wrong with what Belgium's police did. As I mentioned once before in another thread, I am appalled that the Vatican does/did nothing to stop the sex abuse by its priests. I'm even considering leaving the Catholic Church because of that. But I hesitate due to family and friends connections to the Church.

I can't speak for all atheists, some may rant out of prejudice towards theists or because they're deeply insecure about their beliefs or whatever, but I honestly think most atheists' rants are born out of frustration at how otherwise intelligent people will be stupid enough to be willing to believe and do certain things all in the name of some god(s) that may or may not exist. It really is mind-blowingly insane some of the stuff you can convince people to do because some being in the sky supposedly said you should do it. Those that blindly follow, there's no questioning, there's no hesitation, there's no, "Uh, yeah, this is cruel and I won't be party to it", they just go, "Okay" and do it. Shoot first, ask questions later. Not the way I'd suggest living life, but that's just me.

Maybe they are frustrated that some people are willing to do evil things in the name of God, but my experience with atheists has not been a good one. I have yet to meet an atheist who does not harbor anger and hate towards someone who does believe in God. I find it funny that when an atheist complains about the hate some theists have towards certain people, yet when an atheist rants against religious people, they say basically the same thing.
 
Most atheists don't think people they disagree with are going to hell. Nor do they think they are privileged with special knowledge. Many atheists don't think humans are fundamentally evil. Quite a few atheists have been known to love other people.

I don't think religious people are generally bad, but I think they have fundamentally unsound ideas about how we ought to look at the universe.

Pearl you're demonstrating how a good person can be exploited into endorsing criminal organisations. You're a good person so why should you be compelled to go to church and give that institution the power of numbers? You stated that you feel conflicted but take a step back and weigh up what you would consider the moral position without the religious considerations.

What would you do if it was a non-religious institution?

What would you do if you were an atheist?

You are a human being that can make informed decisions without arguments from authority or revelation; make the most of it and do the right thing.
 
Most atheists don't think people they disagree with are going to hell. Nor do they think they are privileged with special knowledge. Many atheists don't think humans are fundamentally evil. Quite a few atheists have been known to love other people.

I don't think religious people are generally bad, but I think they have fundamentally unsound ideas about how we ought to look at the universe.

I'm glad to hear this coming from you.

Pearl you're demonstrating how a good person can be exploited into endorsing criminal organisations. You're a good person so why should you be compelled to go to church and give that institution the power of numbers? You stated that you feel conflicted but take a step back and weigh up what you would consider the moral position without the religious considerations.

What would you do if it was a non-religious institution?

What would you do if you were an atheist?

You are a human being that can make informed decisions without arguments from authority or revelation; make the most of it and do the right thing.

I don't go to church for the sake of the institution; I do it for God.

As for whether I should leave the Catholic Church, I know my parents would be very upset if I left because of the sex abuse. They see the problem as a conspiracy to destroy the Church. Its insane, but that is how they see it. If I were to announce I was leaving Catholicism for another church, my parents would probably not speak to me for a long time.

I think the person who would understand my position would be PhilsFan. And I want to take the time to apologize to him for ever seemingly criticizing him for staying with the Church even though he is an atheist. If I offended you, PhilsFan, I'm sorry. Ever since the abuse was revealed, I've been understanding why you still go the church for your parents' sake.
 
I don't go to church for the sake of the institution; I do it for God.

As for whether I should leave the Catholic Church, I know my parents would be very upset if I left because of the sex abuse. They see the problem as a conspiracy to destroy the Church. Its insane, but that is how they see it. If I were to announce I was leaving Catholicism for another church, my parents would probably not speak to me for a long time.

I think the person who would understand my position would be PhilsFan. And I want to take the time to apologize to him for ever seemingly criticizing him for staying with the Church even though he is an atheist. If I offended you, PhilsFan, I'm sorry. Ever since the abuse was revealed, I've been understanding why you still go the church for your parents' sake.

I was raised in an Italian Catholic household, and went to church, was baptised, had communion, was confirmed, and all that.

As I got older, I began to become disenfranchised with certain teachings of Catholic doctrine, specifically on homosexuality and contraception, that did not match my own personal feelings on those topics. I eventually left the church and no longer do I consider myself a practising Catholic. The sex abuse scandal only further validated my decision.

I respect people for staying for the reasons they do, but I, personally, couldn't care less about what my family thinks. This was about me and my own personal comfort level with what the church was teaching. I don't regret leaving one bit.
 
I think the person who would understand my position would be PhilsFan. And I want to take the time to apologize to him for ever seemingly criticizing him for staying with the Church even though he is an atheist. If I offended you, PhilsFan, I'm sorry. Ever since the abuse was revealed, I've been understanding why you still go the church for your parents' sake.
I've never been offended by anything on here, so don't worry yourself at all. And I'm glad that you can understand better, here's hoping everything works out for you guys.
 
I was raised in an Italian Catholic household, and went to church, was baptised, had communion, was confirmed, and all that.

As I got older, I began to become disenfranchised with certain teachings of Catholic doctrine, specifically on homosexuality and contraception, that did not match my own personal feelings on those topics. I eventually left the church and no longer do I consider myself a practising Catholic. The sex abuse scandal only further validated my decision.

I respect people for staying for the reasons they do, but I, personally, couldn't care less about what my family thinks. This was about me and my own personal comfort level with what the church was teaching. I don't regret leaving one bit.
There's only one thing in the world that would cause my mother to disown me, and I think it would be leaving the Church. She's not a preachy religious type at all, but she's very stern in her beliefs. For me, it's much easier to continue the facade that I accept all the Church's stances and to spend the three months of summer going to church than it would be to explain why I'm more of an agnostic or atheist now. Is it inconvenient sometimes? Yes. Is it uncomfortable for me to sit through some homilies that I totally disagree with? Absolutely. But I do inherently enjoy the company of Catholic people, I've met a ton of good people through being involved with CYO for nearly ten years now, so it's certainly not all bad.
 
I don't go to church for the sake of the institution; I do it for God.
How would a moral entity react to it? Would any ethical deity look kindly upon the Catholic Church?
As for whether I should leave the Catholic Church, I know my parents would be very upset if I left because of the sex abuse. They see the problem as a conspiracy to destroy the Church. Its insane, but that is how they see it. If I were to announce I was leaving Catholicism for another church, my parents would probably not speak to me for a long time.
This trapping is a feature of effective religions because it helps keep people in the institutions. It isn't intelligently designed but it's an attribute which sticks around once it occurs because it keeps perpetuating itself.

If you looked at a cult which excommunicated members and pitted family members against each-other from the outside how would you react?
I think the person who would understand my position would be PhilsFan. And I want to take the time to apologize to him for ever seemingly criticizing him for staying with the Church even though he is an atheist. If I offended you, PhilsFan, I'm sorry. Ever since the abuse was revealed, I've been understanding why you still go the church for your parents' sake.
I enjoy the luxury of not being inculcated with religion from a young age. My partner on the other hand had to suffer the emotional abuse which came with leaving the church, and it gives me nothing but contempt for the institution and the mind-warping effects it has on otherwise decent people.
 
a_wanderer, every time i come here it's pretty much the same with you. your incessant drivel against christians is a treat to read.

i want you to know... i want to affirm to you that you're doing something positive with your free time. you're making a real difference posting these things on this messageboard, a_wanderer. you're opening hearts and minds. a true inspiration to the rest of us who (most unfortunately) stumble upon here now and again.

you're clearly well-read and the wisdom you bestow on your fellow messageboard peers is cherished.

i, for one, cannot wait for your next instalment of compassionate critiquing. thanks again for doing what you do.

haha

yes, right then. if someone half as obnoxious as you existed in my real world they would need fucking aircrash investigators to put them back together.

fuckity-bye
 
Perhaps another instance of what makes atheists so darn angryBBC News - Belgian child sex abuse police probe death threats

I know it's really narrow minded of me to have a problem with this. Those freedom fighters are acting without the consent of holy mother church, and it can't be pinned on the vatican.

I implore all atheists to show more respect to these institutions. Getting angry about petty things like child rape is a sure sign of fundamentalism, and it makes you just as bad as suicide bombers.

Belgium is a Stalinist regime that is enforcing state atheism by looking into these claims and holding a church to relativist human standards.

Straw man, a little bit?

I mean how many Christians are actually making this insane kind of argument.
 
a_wanderer, every time i come here it's pretty much the same with you. your incessant drivel against christians is a treat to read.

i want you to know... i want to affirm to you that you're doing something positive with your free time. you're making a real difference posting these things on this messageboard, a_wanderer. you're opening hearts and minds. a true inspiration to the rest of us who (most unfortunately) stumble upon here now and again.

you're clearly well-read and the wisdom you bestow on your fellow messageboard peers is cherished.

i, for one, cannot wait for your next instalment of compassionate critiquing. thanks again for doing what you do.

haha

yes, right then. if someone half as obnoxious as you existed in my real world they would need fucking aircrash investigators to put them back together.

fuckity-bye

and to be clear, this bit about aircrash investigators is not a threat of any sort. i've lost every fight i've entered, whether it was of the physical or verbal variety.

ask anyone who's ever spoken to me... i can make them look/sound good faster than england can exit a world cup.
 
Straw man, a little bit?

I mean how many Christians are actually making this insane kind of argument.

i'm actually convinced a_wanderer is a repressed christian.

he's fighting it long and hard... it's like he's trying to convince himself he's not.

let's just pet him on the head, leave the room, and maybe he'll come to terms with the real "a_wanderer".
 
a_wanderer, every time i come here it's pretty much the same with you. your incessant drivel against christians is a treat to read.

i want you to know... i want to affirm to you that you're doing something positive with your free time. you're making a real difference posting these things on this messageboard, a_wanderer. you're opening hearts and minds. a true inspiration to the rest of us who (most unfortunately) stumble upon here now and again.

you're clearly well-read and the wisdom you bestow on your fellow messageboard peers is cherished.

i, for one, cannot wait for your next instalment of compassionate critiquing. thanks again for doing what you do.

haha

yes, right then. if someone half as obnoxious as you existed in my real world they would need fucking aircrash investigators to put them back together.

fuckity-bye

Whoa, slow down pal. At best this would be some serious pot-kettle issues.

This is kind of like being black and trying to explain that all black folks aren't criminals and then you see some guy doing a perp walk on the five o clock news, and you're like. . .awww man.
 
Back
Top Bottom