A Trial in Philadelphia - Page 12 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-04-2013, 12:22 AM   #221
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,228
Local Time: 09:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
Please see my earlier comment regarding the fact that those other centers do not potentially put two lives at risk, depending on how we're defining life.
Sure they do. Where have you been? They deal with emergency issues all the time in clinics. Go to your local emergency clinic and ask them what they deal with, and then ask them if they have the same building standards as a surgical center.


Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
I have also yet to see dermatologist's offices or dentist's offices that have been deemed "houses of horrors."
Well it may have not made national news yet, but it sure has made local news but a dermatologist here in TX just got sentenced for sexual assault and unwarranted procedures. More than 2 dozen women in 30 years came forward. It's resulted in 3 suicides so far. Once again, nothing to do with the standards as far as equipment and building code, but if the state were policing their doctors correctly this could have been taken care of years ago, the first complaint was in 1986.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
TX legislators expressed concern about the safety of these centers and this procedure, and given what else is happening in their state and others, I don't find that concern unwarranted.

Legislators in PA put higher standards into place; I don't think TX deserves less.

IMHO.
Then Nathan, be honest with your elected officials and tell them they need to focus their concern on policing those who practice medicine first. Ask Perry how it is he allowed unlicensed "doctors" to perform butcher sessions under his watch? This law wouldn't have changed that.
__________________

BVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 01:07 AM   #222
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVS View Post
Well it may have not made national news yet, but it sure has made local news but a dermatologist here in TX just got sentenced for sexual assault and unwarranted procedures. More than 2 dozen women in 30 years came forward. It's resulted in 3 suicides so far. Once again, nothing to do with the standards as far as equipment and building code, but if the state were policing their doctors correctly this could have been taken care of years ago, the first complaint was in 1986.
Ugh. That's horrible and heartbreaking.

I don't think it's a secret to anyone that women's health care in this country is lackluster at a variety of levels. My aunt fought for years to get her fibromyalgia recognized by her health insurance. My wife has been appalled for years by the sometimes blatant sexism that she's received from health care providers -- part of why she's resorted to naturopathy. So I guess we all have to address what concerns we have about different aspects of women's health as best we can. At your recommendation, I just sent an email to Gov. Perry's office expressing my disappointment at this situation. Thanks for flagging it for me.

In the meantime, driving home tonight I heard a report on NPR that around 60% of Americans polled fluctuate between pro-choice with restrictions and pro-life with exceptions. I felt like it described how I feel most days. Made me feel like maybe the conversation we're having here is representative of the country as a whole.
__________________

nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 02:20 PM   #223
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
trojanchick99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Feliz, CA (between Hollywood and Downtown LA)
Posts: 8,352
Local Time: 08:49 AM
Yes, Women's healthcare in this country has been substandard. And yet, Republicans througout this country are still trying to make it worse. The growing trend of requiring transvaginal ultrasounds before an abortion can be performed makes me sick.

As others have written in this thread, the TX law is just another attempt to limit access to health care which may include abortions for the women of Texas. You know that "abortion clinics" also provide other healthcare, for which there is usually no or a very small charge. These clinics will now no longer be able to provide that healthcare because legislators who don't even know what a freaking rape kit does think they know better than doctors.

You can see why many women are upset right?
trojanchick99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 02:22 PM   #224
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
Legislators in PA put higher standards into place
My state is insanely corrupted by GOP politics. This means nothing.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 02:36 PM   #225
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trojanchick99 View Post
You can see why many women are upset right?
Of course. Can you see why many people -- men and women -- are passionately concerned about this issue on the other side?
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 04:04 PM   #226
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,060
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post

Of course. Can you see why many people -- men and women -- are passionately concerned about this issue on the other side?

Of course.

Can we admit now that what's going on in TX is not about women's health and entirely about reducing the aggregate number of abortions -- and achieving bragging rights for the base for the '14 midterms -- by hook or by crook?
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 06:06 PM   #227
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
by hook or by crook?
An unpleasant, yet apt, image for this topic.
martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:02 PM   #228
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post

Of course.

Can we admit now that what's going on in TX is not about women's health and entirely about reducing the aggregate number of abortions -- and achieving bragging rights for the base for the '14 midterms -- by hook or by crook?
Was that the motivation in PA?

Do I believe there is a political bent to this issue? Sure. Do I believe it's representative of the tension that exists in the country? Sure. Do I believe that, according to statistics, the majority of Americans seem to want more restrictions and regulations on abortion, to maintain the health and safety of those seeking abortions as well as for the unborn babies that may be at risk due to the actions of butchers like Karpen and Gosnell, while at the same time protecting a woman's right to choose? Sure. Do I believe that the majority of Americans, in wanting to do so, are waging a war against women, or are pawns in a diabolical GOP-led plot to force women into back-alley abortions? No. I do not.

If you do, then we should probably just stop talking in circles and lay this thread to rest, because we aren't going to get anywhere.
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:13 PM   #229
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,060
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post

Was that the motivation in PA?

Do I believe there is a political bent to this issue? Sure. Do I relieve it's representative of the tension that exists in the country? Sure. Do I believe that, according to statistics, the majority of Americans seem to want more restrictions and regulations on abortion, to maintain the health and safety of those seeking abortions as well as for the unborn babies that may be at risk due to the actions of butchers like Karpen and Gosnell, while protecting a woman's right to choose? Sure. Do I believe that the majority of Americans, in wanting to do so, are waging a war against women, or are pawns in a diabolical GOP-led plot to force women into back-alley abortions? No. I do not.

If you do, then we should probably just stop talking in circles and lay this thread to rest, because we aren't going to get anywhere.


Restrictions and regulations on abortions themselves, yes, that's what it's about.

You've extrapolated far beyond my question, just as this legislation has intentions far beyond keeping women safe.
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:37 PM   #230
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post

You've extrapolated far beyond my question
Well, you've made a lot of comments and insinuations -- or outright accusations -- about me and my motives and perspective in the course of this conversation. So I just thought I'd address a bunch of them all at once. :-)
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:43 PM   #231
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,060
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post

Well, you've made a lot of comments and insinuations -- or outright accusations -- about me and my motives and perspective in the course of this conversation. So I just thought I'd address a bunch of them all at once. :-)

I think we've revealed them?
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:57 PM   #232
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Strong Badia
Posts: 3,440
Local Time: 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post

I think we've revealed them?
Sure. I'm right about in the middle of how the majority of Americans feel about this issue. I'm struggling with how to address it -- with the balancing act of ethical considerations, women's health, a woman's legally protected right to choose, and health standards and regulations that have been problematic (or outright ignored) by clinics in more than one state -- but pretty sure that a hard-line one way or the other isn't the answer. Right where I was when I came into this conversation.

So...Congratulations, I guess?
nathan1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 08:09 PM   #233
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33,060
Local Time: 10:49 AM
I feel satisfied that we better understand what's going on in TX as well as the obsession with the Gosnell case and that neither are about safety but the manipulation if "safety" to further an agenda.
Irvine511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 08:09 PM   #234
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,730
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
Sure. I'm right about in the middle of how the majority of Americans feel about this issue.
I think it's very difficult to really ascertain how most Americans feel about the issue so long as it is in the abstract. If abortion were banned or constructively banned (which is the intended effect of most of these legislative proposals from the GOP), would opinions change? Would there be a case of buyer's remorse if suddenly there was no access? If politicians' daughters couldn't get an abortion, and so on?

When you say "safe, legal and rare" I think that we have a different idea of how to achieve the "rare" bit. To me, it has to do with comprehensive sex education in public school (something the GOP is against), cheap and accessible birth control (again, something the GOP is against and let's not forget Limbaugh's assault on "sluts" on birth control), funding clinics like Planned Parenthood so that poor women and scared teenagers whose parents have buried their heads in the sand like ostriches and are shoving abstinence down the throats of girls who are sexually active (again, something the GOP wants to de-fund, and they've already done that in Texas only to have buyer's remorse now that the costs are high so they are looking to re-fund PP to at least some degree), etc. These are all things that the conservatives are by and large against. To them, rare means shutting down clinics, imposing regulations that are unnecessary, forcing intrusive transvaginal ultrasounds for no medical reason whatsoever because they want to guilt and bully pregnant women and so on.

So when you say "safe, legal and rare" and I agree, I don't think you and I are talking about the same thing.
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 09:14 PM   #235
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Would there be a case of buyer's remorse if suddenly there was no access? I
You could ask South Dakotans about that.
martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 10:53 PM   #236
Blue Crack Addict
 
PhilsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 19,218
Local Time: 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan1977 View Post
Was that the motivation in PA?
Well. I guess we have confirmed that he has put me on ignore.

The ignore button might be the worst invention on this forum. Ignoring ideas is a shitty way to go about a debate.
PhilsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 10:59 PM   #237
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,730
Local Time: 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martha View Post
You could ask South Dakotans about that.
Oh yes, those were the geniuses who re-defined pregnancy as beginning at conception, a completely scientifically absurd idea.
anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 11:03 PM   #238
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
Pearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,741
Local Time: 11:49 AM
I thought that was North Dakota? Or have both Dakota gone to hell?
Pearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 11:19 PM   #239
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
Oh yes, those were the geniuses who re-defined pregnancy as beginning at conception, a completely scientifically absurd idea.

And then they backtracked on the law, if I remember correctly.
martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 11:25 PM   #240
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,730
Local Time: 10:49 AM
The voters voted it down in a referendum. Turns out an abortion ban wasn't the utopia they thought it would be.
__________________

anitram is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×