womanfish
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
As I read through a bunch of the tweets, I was noticing about 1 in 20 or so was saying, hey thanks, not bad, or I like it. 1 in 20 aint bad!
As I read through a bunch of the tweets, I was noticing about 1 in 20 or so was saying, hey thanks, not bad, or I like it. 1 in 20 aint bad!
If 1/20 (5%) of 500 million people listen to it and dig it that's 25 million people. Not bad indeed.
Of course that's also 25M more people who may want to buy a ticket.....
Still cant believe I am seeing people say it was "forced" onto them, U2 have really gotten into the heads of the mainstream folk with this one, and quite literally giving the finger
I still can't come to terms just how smart this move was from the band.
They've quite simply picked the No.1 most strongest, powerful and global way of promoting a new album. There's no topping this. There's no better way to tell the public, their back. It's sound impossible what they've actually done, and in some ways, naughty, when you consider they've stuck music on peoples phones without their knowledge, which makes it all the more enjoyable
Whether people love or hate the album is almost irrelevant. The fact their talking about U2 was the band's aim. Even the most angriest of U2 haters can surely only applaud what a clever promotional move this was! Complete and utter genius!!
I've not actually looked into the ins and outs of how it was actually transferred to people's music libraries...Was it as simple as, anybody with an iPhone and network connection, received the album, or did people have to connect their phones to iTunes in order to receive it?
Yeah.To sum up many of these tweets, it's "HEY! YOU! GET OUTTA MY iCLOUD!"
Hey old friend.
Any idea of what that would translate into sales wise? I mean what does something need to be selling to be in the top 10? 20?
I know that's a long shot
Also, in your opinion will this translate into several U2 albums showing up on next weeks Billboard album chart?
I never compared iTunes charts to Billboard charts.
As a result, I have no idea if #1 in iTunes means #1 on Billboard or not.
U2's surprise free album on iTunes was ridiculed by some iPhone users for forcing its way onto their devices this week, but U2 is having the last laugh as the Apple stunt for the band's new Songs of Innocence inspired fans to purchase other U2 titles on iTunes.
At one point Thursday afternoon, 26 U2 titles charted simultaneously on iTunes top 200 albums rankings, Apple and Interscope Records representatives confirmed to Mashable on Friday. Meanwhile, U218 Singles landed in the top 10 in 46 countries.
U2 had zero albums on the iTunes chart the day before Tuesday's Apple event.
"Obviously this demonstrates the high level of engagement in the aftermath of the release — it's an unprecedented feat," Interscope's Dennis Dennehy told Mashable, crediting Apple's major marketing push at Tuesday's iPhone 6 event and U2's inherent global reach as a veteran rock band. "Besides giving away a new U2 album as a gift to iTunes store customers, the initiative with iTunes clearly encouraged discovery for new fans and a rediscovery for existing ones.
After that, iTunes users started exploring U2's catalog and buying the band's albums, compilations and live versions. As of Friday evening, 18 titles were still in the top 200.
"It’s disruptive, and it has never been done before," U2's manager Guy Oseary told Mashable about the album release. "This will probably be dissected for many years to come. ... I’m just happy that a lot more people are listening to this album than they would have."
Oseary added that it's too early to know download figures, though Recode is reporting 2 million downloads.
"From what I'm hearing, they're very promising," he said. "But it's hard to tell because somebody new may listen to it in a month. Somebody new may listen to it in a year."
A revamped Songs of Innocence, with four additional songs and several acoustic renditions, will go on sale at other retailers starting Oct. 14. Upon that release, Billboard will start calculating its sales, as it won't take into account Apple's release.
NOTE: A full Q&A with U2's manager Oseary is scheduled to publish on Mashable on Saturday.
What is relevance?Earlier this week, U2 crashed Apple's big iPhone 6 announcement party to perform their new single, "The Miracle (Of Joey Ramone)" for the crowd in Cupertino, Calif. The song comes from the band's new album, Songs of Innocence, an 11-track release now available for free on iTunes. Turns out that while iTunes users have been picking up the new album free of charge this week, they've also been buying up other U2 albums.
As of right now, U2 is occupying 20 out of the 100 spots on the iTunes album chart. The remastered version of The Joshua Tree (1987) has the highest spot at No. 7, and other big sellers from the band, like Achtung Baby and War, also show up on the list. So attention artists out there: Giving away your music for free—you should try it.
There's been quite a bit of online discussion about U2 and Apple "forcing" the album on people without their permission (not true, if you have your privacy settings on). Some say it's a lesson for the future - artist should let the consumer "find" them.
Clearly some are not getting it. Natural discovery simply doesn't work well any more. Radio doesn't work - especially for an older artist. MTV is dead. Best Buy stores used to have headphones that allowed people to sample CD's, but with the advent of downloads and streaming, that's gone too. In other words, without some sort of commercial aspect, many artists simply aren't getting heard. Period.
Pitchfork may be right that this move does seem a bit desperate. But I feel it's desperation for ALL artists, not just U2.
I recall in 1999/2000 time frame when both Sting and Moby released albums that were ignored. Both then had one of their songs used in separate car commercial. Those songs received such positive attention from the commercial that both the songs and corresponding albums boomed in sales. Radio had failed them. MTV failed them. Traditional retail failed them. This was 14 years ago and it's only become worse. Unless an artist does something different to really get the masses to hear their music, they won't get heard. If big artists like Sting and U2 can't succeed it means that new artists will face an even bigger hurdle.
U2 found a new way to present their music. The format may not be loved and future versions of this format may be more subdued, but U2 (and Apple) achieved something big - they got people talking. And as already demonstrated in this thread, there are people who never heard of U2 (oddly enough) and are now listening to them for the first time. People are downloading U2. And Apple is reaping in sales money and attention just in time for their new iPhone. Win/win!
Feel free to complain, but are there really alternatives? I expect more of these types of actions in the future unless we go back to 1982 where radio would play all sorts of artists and MTV played videos. Because barring a few selected artists, new music isn't getting heard. And that is a shame.
I can actually imagine a young hip college kid waking up and thinking they have a virus on their phone, I shouldn't laugh but