Should U2 release a ballad as the first single off the next album?

[Von Schloopen]

Talk about an overreaction. Which would be fine otherwise but putting fucking words in my mouth (for the second time) pisses me off. And you didn't even wait for me to respond and simply say 'relax, this is what I meant'. It was in direct relation to my using the term MOR several times in both posts.

Overreaction? Didn't Wait for you to speak?

I was happily waiting for your response. Then LemonMelon spoke for you.

Uninformed people listen to MOR music because they don't know any better.

That doesn't warrant an angry response from you?

But this does?

Please, explain. I shall enjoy this.

Curious. You seem to be doing the EXACT SAME THING you accuse me of doing.

 

[LemonMirrorSky]

Magnificent or nothing.

I still say that it would've been the best first single!

 

[david]

They should just go the Flaming Lips route and be really weird 50 something musicians that don't care anymore and just make magical soundscapes.

 

[LemonMelon]

They should just go the Flaming Lips route and be really weird 50 something musicians that don't care anymore and just make magical soundscapes.

Let Edge and Adam take the reins for a while.

 

[AndrewCowley]

Here's the deal.

Singles don't matter anyway. But they should just release a normal song. Not a song that makes everyone's eye's roll ala 'omg U2 are trying to be teenagers again'.

 

[An Cat Gav]

They should just go the Flaming Lips route and be really weird 50 something musicians that don't care anymore and just make magical soundscapes.

 

[Rachel D.]

It's been a while since we've had some news. I think it's time for a leak or something.

 

[Babyface82]

It's been a while since we've had some news. I think it's time for a leak or something.

yes

 

[powerhour24]

Or this place will devolve into making up its own rumors and discussing them again.

Where's Slow Loris when we need them?