New Banners / 2 Logo?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
So we've dropped "The" and they're just 2 now? :wink:

I like the U=2 thing, simple and cool. The typeface for the album name is okay.
 
The more I look at it the more I like the typefact.

Whats even better is what I call Coldplay - "C2".
 
No. Why can't you handle that I want to call them the 2? I might start capitalising the 't'.

:wink:

Its just forced and unnecessary.

Its like that kid back in highschool that everyone knew that would try incessantly to create new terms or phrases for things that didn't make sense or would never stick.

"man that thing is totally atomic!" (instead of that things the bomb)


its just dumb, thats all.
 
Is this even official? Looking at the source there is no copyright info anywhere, and the images aren't located in the same places as U2.com images...

According to NME the site was registered by Universal on behalf of The 2.
 
Just in !!! My mate said he talked to Paul and he told him Q was going to write in the new issue that calling U2 the 2 is lame, FACT.
 
haha. i just threw one of the banners up on my website--who cares if they're real or not?!
 
I just don't see the problem - loads of fans call them The 2.

o_rly.jpg
 
I have to say, I have NEVER heard, seen or read anyone calling U2 "the 2" on any forum, radio show, TV show, book, movie, TV show or song (or any other media). I suspect this is because "the 2" sounds ridiculous.

If they were called "The Sounds of the Irish 2", then sure.
 
Back
Top Bottom