[HOAX] a very different sneak peak at NLOTH

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Zoomerang96

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Jun 22, 2000
Messages
14,298
Location
canada
U2 return to stadium rock, roots on new disc

by Tedd Connors

With less than two months to go before the world's biggest band launch their latest offering to the masses, a select few journalists were allowed entry to a private listening party for U2's No Line on the Horizon.

The scene is a small meeting room in a posh London hotel and it's four days until Christmas. Sitting comfortably against a wall are Bono, drummer Larry Mullen Jr., and co-producers Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois. The purpose of today's preview, later admitted by Bono, was to drum up further excitement for the album launch in March.

"Ladies and gentlemen, we're here today to unveil our latest rocketship," Bono said tongue firmly in cheek. "Two scientists (referring to the Edge and Adam) weren't able to make it tonight, but the rest of the lab workers are and we're excited to give you just a little glimpse as to what we've worked on."

With that brief introduction came a blitz of short song bites, the equivalent of about 20 second song snippets played back to back.
After these were played in a loop two or three times over, I came to the quick realisation that from all audio evidence, U2 are about to deliver the ultimate soul-rock album.

"We wish we could play the whole songs for you, but alas the record company wouldn't have any of it just yet," Larry said. "But as you heard, we were keen to come out with our most refined sound yet.

"We were aiming to fuse the soul we delivered on All That You Can't Leave Behind with the directness of How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb."

From the clips presented, that would certainly be the case. It all sounded like U2 in full gear... a mish mash of the basic elements that saw U2 come together in the first place - vox, guitars, and drums.

"There are no reverse gears in this rocket ship or in our band, as I've said many times before," Bono said. "But we really feel like we've made the record we always wanted to."

The lead singer went on to describe the lyrical themes of the album to be "varied", drifting from the point of view from a man who's "experiencing a midlife crisis", to "showcasing Africa's plight through the eyes of a rockstar".

"We wanted to reach a very large audience with this record, and while we've always said we wanted to move forward, sometimes Brian pushed us a little too far to the left," Mullen Jr. conceded. "We wanted to focus on the music, and not get too distracted by beeps and whistles."

Eno readily admitted that as being the case.

"We scrapped a number - most if not all the more adventurous song structures in favour for a more familiar 4/4, 3/4 and kept away from the Pro Tools," Eno said. "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."

Further and more inclusive listening parties are expected in the immediate lead up to the new album's release, but for now, the little sneak peak given will hopefully be a true indication of great things to come on the charts and award programmes.

No finer proof than the stockpile of Grammy's Bono is expecting the band to receive in 2010.

"We're on a bit of a roll there, and it's been a true indication of how well our recent music has been received," said Bono. "We've always felt they've got their fingers on the pulse of the music industry, and raking in a few more Grammy's in the face of the world's best bands like the Killers, Coldplay, and Green Day is like winning the World Cup of music."

And whilst it may be too early to tell if Bono hopes of further Grammy success will come to pass, early indications are 2010 may well be a banner year for No Line on the Horizon.
 
"We scrapped a number - most if not all the more adventurous song structures in favour for a more familiar 4/4, 3/4 and kept away from the Pro Tools," Eno said. "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."

Yeah I can see why he's expecting some grammy's :doh:

Why does that even MATTER?!
 
:down:

move away from Eno's experients to something 'universally appealing'??? fuck me...how sad they feel the need to plod along this way these days.
 
"We scrapped a number - most if not all the more adventurous song structures in favour for a more familiar 4/4, 3/4 and kept away from the Pro Tools," Eno said. "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."

Fuck.
 
^ oh dear, waiting for the naysayers to latch onto this...

thanks for posting :wave:

Come off it. Ditching something "unique and special" in favour of the bland middle road is pretty much unjustifiable. Go on, blind sheep, defend this one. You can't.
 
^ oh dear, waiting for the naysayers to latch onto this...

thanks for posting :wave:

Look, I'm not trying to nay-say, but this has got to be the most depressing news I HAVE heard about the album yet. Dropping stuff to appeal to the masses to win grammy's? Is that what you really want to hear them say?
 
to me this is positive. Scrap all the garbage like passengers (eno is a great influence on U2 music, passenger music SUCKS!)

with what we hear about new sonic ground on GOYB, premature to bash it from a guy who's heard 20 seconds of each song
 
Look, I'm not trying to nay-say, but this has got to be the most depressing news I HAVE heard about the album yet. Dropping stuff to appeal to the masses to win grammy's? Is that what you really want to hear them say?

no, but im sure it wasn't that blunt. quotes have been juxraposed to present that image.
 
Come off it. Ditching something "unique and special" in favour of the bland middle road is pretty much unjustifiable. Go on, blind sheep, defend this one. You can't.

:up:

If this is the case, they are just becoming another Rolling Stones. Don't worry, salesman Bono will tell you otherwise, but that is the reality.
 
to me this is positive. Scrap all the garbage like passengers (eno is a great influence on U2 music, passenger music SUCKS!)

with what we hear about new sonic ground on GOYB, premature to bash it from a guy who's heard 20 seconds of each song

:hmm: there are many ways I WANT to respond to this...all of them are violent.
 
Source please.

Most of that article sounds crap to me. There is so much wrong with that review.

I don't believe Bono would say what he is quoted as saying about the Grammys, I'm sorry. "Africa's plight through the eyes of a rockstar"? WTF, that isn't Bono. I think whoever wrote that has a vivid fantasy.

20seconds of songs, yeah, that truly qualifies for a album review.

There have been so many fake articles and reviews recently, I believe it when the album has come out.
 
"We wanted to reach a very large audience with this record, and while we've always said we wanted to move forward, sometimes Brian pushed us a little too far to the left," Mullen Jr. conceded. "We wanted to focus on the music, and not get too distracted by beeps and whistles."

Eno readily admitted that as being the case.

"We scrapped a number - most if not all the more adventurous song structures in favour for a more familiar 4/4, 3/4 and kept away from the Pro Tools," Eno said. "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."

Scrapped adventurous song structures :down: It just shows that the band are only willing to appeal to a mass audience. Not happy :mad:

This review doesn't sound like it will be the "innovative" album I have been dieing to hear. :banghead:
 
I think they scrapped the real "far out" stuff that would not make a good stadium rock band album.. Which is somewhat what we want right? We want them to blast away with great melody/lyrics, not mellow with touchy, feely, passengers, newage balony..

Feel better now? :applaud::up:
 
Actually...before we go off here...is this a joke? surely U2 wouldnt openly admit to gearing there music to win grammys.
 
Who, may I ask, is Tedd Connors writing for? And where did you find this piece?

i often write as ted connors, and i found this piece in the back of my mind for a few days and finally found some time to write it this morning.
 
We scrapped a number - most if not all the more adventurous song structures in favour for a more familiar 4/4, 3/4 and kept away from the Pro Tools," Eno said. "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."

This is the same Eno who said this album was U2's best ever album only a couple of days ago
 
For me it's very weird this sad news about a tradicional pop/rock album, because some days ago Eno said with this words: "Devastating! It's devastatingly brilliant!" about the album...

And now he's come with this "It was quite frustrating for me, throughout, because I felt we had a great chance to do something unique and special, but they collectively insisted they wanted to make this record 'universally appealing'."...

Very, very, very strange... there's something (or someone) not telling the truth... someone agreed with me ?
 
I do hope it's a joke.

to me this is positive. Scrap all the garbage like passengers (eno is a great influence on U2 music, passenger music SUCKS!)

Well, you enjoy your dull middle-of-the-road music that has nothing to really contribute, while I'll stick with music that actually does interesting and creative things. :wave:
 
My fear, going back ages now, was that the album would be dictated by them wanting to play stadiums once more. One last go at it. And with that you have to make a certain type of album. Not the type a lot of us here want. Now I am worried.
 
Come off it. Ditching something "unique and special" in favour of the bland middle road is pretty much unjustifiable. Go on, blind sheep, defend this one. You can't.

Bollocks man, it'll be brilliant, it always is with U2.

Calling music you haven't heard yet "bland and middle of the road" is a bit ludicrous.
 
Well, this one sums it up, folks. Exactly what I was talking about the whole time. At least they're being open about it. Unless it's a fake, which very well could be. Sounds a bit too open.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom