Y2K
Refugee
Does anyone have a link to the video that used to be freely available on U2.com, in which Brian Eno is interviewed for like 5-6 minutes just about "Moment of Surrender"?
It's fantastic -- even better than the song. I think he does another one about Magnificent. He has a wonderful way of expressing himself.Does anyone have a link to the video that used to be freely available on U2.com, in which Brian Eno is interviewed for like 5-6 minutes just about "Moment of Surrender"?
It's fantastic -- even better than the song.
..................what?
Let me know if you're still interested, please.Does anyone have a link to the video that used to be freely available on U2.com, in which Brian Eno is interviewed for like 5-6 minutes just about "Moment of Surrender"?
If it wasn't recorded in the 90's it's not cool...
Have you not learned yet?
You're welcome! Let's hope they don't take it off...Thanks so much TM - magical!
I don't think U2 fans are quite as idiotic as you think they are. Firstly, I would be surprised if they like Please, Mofo and Lemon etc simply because they were recorded in the 1990s. Rather, I suspect it is because they were interesting songs with great lyrics, which took U2 into a different territory. Secondly and relatedly, (for me at least) there are profound diferences between their 90s work and what followed. It is not simply a question of chronology. I know Bono likes to remind us that BD starts with a drum machine and that LAPOE bounces off crazy synth work but for some fans on here, their post-milennial stuff did mark a change, and not neccesarily one for the better. To simply dismiss those views as superficial risks appearing rather patronising.
I don't think U2 fans are quite as idiotic as you think they are. Firstly, I would be surprised if they like Please, Mofo and Lemon etc simply because they were recorded in the 1990s. Rather, I suspect it is because they were interesting songs with great lyrics, which took U2 into a different territory. Secondly and relatedly, (for me at least) there are profound diferences between their 90s work and what followed. It is not simply a question of chronology. I know Bono likes to remind us that BD starts with a drum machine and that LAPOE bounces off crazy synth work but for some fans on here, their post-milennial stuff did mark a change, and not neccesarily one for the better. To simply dismiss those views as superficial risks appearing rather patronising.
It's one thing to admit that ATYCLB and HTDAAB had their problems. But I think that a lot people feel that those who lump NLOTH in with them are usually doing so for knee-jerk reasons and not because of the quality of the work. I certainly feel this way.
Then there are those of us who think that NLOTH is an excellent break from ATYLCB and the utter disaster of Bomb, putting U2 back into the territory that they were in for AB->Zooropa->Pax->Pop. But there are also many people who absolutely refuse to believe that U2 can create anything as good now as they did in the 80s and 90s, and damn anything that U2 create before they even create it.
Does anyone have the link to the 'Magnificent' interview