The Eras of U2...

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
yea, but it would proly be alot easier if i just go with the company line.

just go with yourself bro. just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they're going with the company line. You're not the only one with a different opinion here. so you're in the minority thinking MOS would fit on ATYCLB. So what? We're allowed to disagree here. Just stand behind your argument and don't take it so personal.
 
^ Yeah, I know. And I agree with you, popacrobat
However, I've read the whole thread, and I think the MOS/ATYCLB/whatever discussion has become so blurred that you'd better leave it there and think what makes you happier :shrug: (it's just my opinion :up:)



i've said this before, but i'm proud to say that i love all 3 decades.

I'm a proud one too, mikal :hi5:
 
i'll never use classic rock to descibe u2. Thiers so many classic bands that, AT LEAST IN THIS AREA, that blow away u2 on airplay. Pink floyd,stones,doors,elton john,billy joel,led eppelin, the who,springsteen,etc. On the the local classic rock sation here, Q104 in NY , while they may play u2, they still don;t get as much as those others bands. Lets hear dark side of the moon for the 5,000,000,000th time.
 
Back
Top Bottom