Moser
Refugee
Double layered Kevlar flame-suit on.
I think you should invest in a bear suit lol. Good post though.
Double layered Kevlar flame-suit on.
Gee your calling Miami, GONE, WUDM crap songs? In MY OPINION the only fairly weak track on this album is IGWSHA which had a better single version. Still my second favourite album behind AB but thats just me. Anyway this subject has been done to the death!
I agree with you
Playboy Mansion only suffers from some dated lyrics other than that I love this tune
The Playboy Mansion, Gone and Velvet Dress are crap???
They're better than Please...
imo.
i think miami is the weakest track on the album, yet i still love it.
what does that tell you?
Listen to Miami live and you WILL go crazy.
You can never have enough POP in your lifeBTW, we already have lots of threads on Pop.
It should be noted that Pop is the most loved U2 album on this forum, where it is more popular than both God and the sun. In the real world, however, outside of Interference, it is a relatively less appreciated U2 album. (Kind of hard to say that with a straight face when it sold 7 or 8 million copies, but such are the commercial standards of U2.) Pop was to U2 somewhat like Be Here Now to Oasis (the same year) in that it had huge expectations before it arrived, sold big in the first couple of weeks, and then quickly faded away from contemporary relevance and the top end of the music charts. This was a different type of profile to U2 albums before and since, and it happened for a variety of factors.
I do think there are large problems with this album, but I also think it is a superior collection of songs (except for 'Miami'). The problems are not only the way the songs were recorded and arranged, but that was a large part of it . . . It was kind of a "square peg in a round hole" type of album back in 1997.
Anyway, it's another great U2 record, and I don't think its lesser profile back in '97 or '98 really matters now, does it? I do wish they would revive some of its forgotten songs in concert -- in particular, it's a travesty that they don't perform 'Discotheque' more regularly, and I concur that 'Please' was the best song on it and one of U2's greatest. (The ultimate slap in the Pop-fans' face was leaving 'Please' off of The Best of 1990-2000 album).
One thing that seldom gets said about Pop is that it is really dark. I would say it is by far U2's angriest and more despairing set of songs.
It should be noted that Pop is the most loved U2 album on this forum, where it is more popular than both God and the sun. In the real world, however, outside of Interference, it is a relatively less appreciated U2 album. (Kind of hard to say that with a straight face when it sold 7 or 8 million copies, but such are the commercial standards of U2.) Pop was to U2 somewhat like Be Here Now to Oasis (the same year) in that it had huge expectations before it arrived, sold big in the first couple of weeks, and then quickly faded away from contemporary relevance and the top end of the music charts. This was a different type of profile to U2 albums before and since, and it happened for a variety of factors.
I do think there are large problems with this album, but I also think it is a superior collection of songs (except for 'Miami'). The problems are not only the way the songs were recorded and arranged, but that was a large part of it . . . It was kind of a "square peg in a round hole" type of album back in 1997.
Anyway, it's another great U2 record, and I don't think its lesser profile back in '97 or '98 really matters now, does it? I do wish they would revive some of its forgotten songs in concert -- in particular, it's a travesty that they don't perform 'Discotheque' more regularly, and I concur that 'Please' was the best song on it and one of U2's greatest. (The ultimate slap in the Pop-fans' face was leaving 'Please' off of The Best of 1990-2000 album).
One thing that seldom gets said about Pop is that it is really dark. I would say it is by far U2's angriest and more despairing set of songs.
mofo!
What is so dated about that song?
true, it's just a shame that it dates the song, you know?
Most U2 songs are timeless lyric-wise because Bono doesn't mention specific names or events of the time.
If the human race is still around 500 years from now and are still listening to music, I can't see them understanding Playboy Mansion whereas something like WOWY would still resonate imo...
Just out of curiosity what was going on with Coke at the time?
I think Bono is talking about Coke. The formula for Coke has been a long time secret/mystery.
If Coke is a mystery
I have 2 friends who love the Playboy Mansion. I never understood the hate for it.
Well, I sort of explained already below:
I'll elaborate if you like:
First of all the title and concept of "The Playboy Mansion" while I understand is a comparison to Heaven and while I think it's an awesome idea, it is a Western 20th century concept.
Some of the lines below are what really date the song:
If coke is a mystery
Michael Jackson, history
If beauty is truth
And surgery the fountain of youth...
What am I to do?
Have I got the gifts to get me through
The gates of that mansion
If O.J. is more than a drink
And a Big Mac bigger than you think
And perfume is an obsession
And talk shows confession
People and things like OJ, Coke, Obsession, Big Macs and even Michael Jackson are not really universal themes. Like I said in my quote above, if someone were to listen to this song 500 years in the future would they understand what Bono is talking about?
WHo the FUCK cares about people from 500 years from now? the fact of the matter is we are here, we are now, and the song is freaking awesome!