Magnificent yanked from radio???

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.

david

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
11,036
Location
southern california
By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer Jennifer C. Kerr, Associated Press Writer – 48 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Which top-selling artist purportedly had his new single yanked from some radio stations playlists in retaliation for supporting royalties for musicians?

No one involved will name the recording artist, but his no-play treatment by several radio stations is alleged in a complaint filed with the Federal Communications Commission and obtained by The Associated Press. It claims recording artists are being threatened and intimidated.

In the filing, the musicFIRST Coalition says the top-selling artist — there are hints it could be U2 frontman Bono — recently released a new album and spoke during April in support of an effort to require radio stations to pay musicians royalties similar to those paid to songwriters.

Soon after, it said, "several stations within a major radio broadcast group notified the artist's label that they would no longer play his single on the air."

Representatives for musicFIRST refused to identify the artist.

U2's album, "No Line on the Horizon," was released in March with its leadoff single, "Get on Your Boots."

In April, Bono issued a statement on behalf of pay for musicians, saying, "It's only fair that when radio makes money by playing a recording artist's music ... the recording artist should be compensated just as songwriters are already."

Calls and e-mails to a spokeswoman for Bono were not immediately returned.

Other artists involved with musicFIRST include Don Henley, Celine Dion, Christina Aguilera and Wyclef Jean.

The filing also alleges unfair treatment of other artists by radio stations in Florida, Delaware and Texas. It does not identify any of the stations but accuses the stations of unlawfully putting their own financial interests above their obligation to serve the public. The group asks the FCC, which regulates the public airwaves, to investigate.

The controversy centers on legislation in Congress that would require radio stations to pay musicians royalties. Satellite radio, Internet radio and cable TV music channels already pay fees to performers and musicians, along with songwriter royalties. AM and FM radio stations just pay songwriters, not performers.

The National Association of Broadcasters opposes the bill, called the Performance Rights Act. The NAB says it amounts to a tax on U.S. radio stations and threatens thousands of jobs.

The filing by musicFIRST, made late Tuesday, also said:

_A Delaware radio station boycotted all artists affiliated with musicFIRST for an entire month.

_Before an interview, an artist was pressured by a Texas radio station to state on the air that the Performance Rights Act would cripple radio stations.
 
They are playing it on radio here. How often, I don't know since I don't listen to radio. And what does "his single" mean? Since when is Bono a solo artist? I think the media is again trying to blow things out of proportion.
 
I've heard this song on Sirius too (in my car).

But if there's any truth to this article, it might explain why the song didn't really become a bigger hit. This song is meant for A/C stations. Plus, given it's classic U2 sound, uplifting them and music, and modern style, it should have been a sure-thing hit for U2. The fact that it wasn't surprised me quite a bit.
 
I've heard this song on Sirius too (in my car).

But if there's any truth to this article, it might explain why the song didn't really become a bigger hit. This song is meant for A/C stations. Plus, given it's classic U2 sound, uplifting them and music, and modern style, it should have been a sure-thing hit for U2. The fact that it wasn't surprised me quite a bit.

I thought initial poor sales were due to it being released as a vinyl single first..

And people picked up on that and just ran with it.
 
I've heard this song on Sirius too (in my car).

But if there's any truth to this article, it might explain why the song didn't really become a bigger hit. This song is meant for A/C stations. Plus, given it's classic U2 sound, uplifting them and music, and modern style, it should have been a sure-thing hit for U2. The fact that it wasn't surprised me quite a bit.

yeah, if this is true, then i think that's probably the best explanation of why "Magnificent" didn't do better.
 
well... i believe it's probably Get On Your Boots that was pulled, since they say it took place in April, before Magnificent was released.

but i suppose if they did this over Boots that it would also have a negative effect on Magnificent.

that is all of course if it is, in fact, U2 and Bono that are involved in this... right now it's still just speculation.

might explain the delays in the release of videos and singles...
 
I think now we're just trying to find a scapegoat for why NLOTH isn't being played on the radio. Let's face it... the reason why U2 isn't being played is because people aren't liking the songs. We can argue all day about all the other stuff, about how people's taste in music sucks, how radio stations are out to get us, what format the single was released in, etc. But when it all comes down to it... it's the music.

Anyways, I think Magnificent is a great song, but I never saw it as radio friendly. Kids don't eat up U2 these days
 
93.1 in Chicago plays anywhere from 5-10 U2 songs a day, and I hear at least one song from NLOTH every day. Maginificent, Breathe, Moment of Surrender.


They also, funny enough, play commericals pretty regularly dealing with the radio-music-taxation issue, so I doubt that they would play U2 under those circumstances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom