canedge
Refugee
whatever BVS.
Last Unicorn, who are you speaking about?
Last Unicorn, who are you speaking about?
with their usual hate tirades against U2
with their usual hate tirades against U2
I can't believe some people are spamming this thread with their usual hate tirades against U2 when this has nothing to do with the band but with Bono and his campaign. This behaviour is just ignorant and totally unnecessary
The Panther said:U2's appearances on mainstream TV shows have become embarrassing, in my opinion. Again, it comes back to the old "how-far-are-they-gonna-go-to-sell-themselves?" question, and, as you can guess, in my mind this is going too far. The occasional such appearance can be useful, but their appearances on Letterman/Daily Show/Oprah/Jonathan Ross, et al. have become so commonplace that no one is getting excited about it. It wouldn't be so bad if the band came off better on these shows... but they don't.
It's pretty incredible how hostile Interference can get during the dry periods without albums and tours. And this is only the beginning of the wasteland.
We've already been here for a while...
It's pretty incredible how hostile Interference can get during the dry periods without albums and tours. And this is only the beginning of the wasteland.
Oh do stop moaning.
Keep dreaming.I'm truly relieved to hear that Bono doesn't have any sex problems after his injury/surgery.
If the world's U2 haters are turned off, where do they end up? Liking U2 again?But the idea of U2 on mainstream, 'Regis-and-Kathy-Lee' kind of talk shows, kind of turns me off in a big way (and probably turns off the world's many U2 haters).
Do you try to be amusing? Those were the only potential complications from the surgery, not the only potential complications from the injury.See. The only complications were dropped foot and sexual dysfunction.
So says the guy with an avatar of Einstein flipping everyone the bird.I'd like to renew my clarion call for decorum and civility.
I agree that Paul usually comes off as (to overstate it somewhat) a "pompous twat". That was exactly my point -- that he surprisingly didn't come off as a pompous twat on the recent Letterman appearance, whereas frankly, I think Bono did. U2, by their own repeated admission, just aren't good at doing humor.Paul like usual came off as a pompous twat in that appearance, and making NLOTH sound like the Archie's? Really?
I said that he can be pretentious in a lovable or horrible way, depending on your perspective. Obviously (or so I thought), from the perspective of a U2 fan like myself, it's a lovable quality -- his type of pretension doesn't bother me at all, and I quite admire it. But thousands of people are annoyed by it.You know when they call Bono pretentious just like you just did, what does you mean exactly?
Uh... no, I don't think that's what I said.Are you saying that the plight of AIDS is not a crises?
They're both a bit overweight. Other than that, they're near-perfect.I like both Paul and Bono. What's wrong with either of them?
Yup.I think that terms like 'annoying' are completely subjective.
I actually didn't know that. My comments were regarding mainstream TV appearances in general, not regarding this recent one specifically which clearly had a more noble purpose.What the hell you on?
This had nothing to do with u2 ,it isnt an apperance or there not selling anything
I just watched the interview. I'd complain about it, but I really don't have anything to complain about. It was short, but Bono came off as intelligent, and I didn't really detect any pompousness.
I agree that Paul usually comes off as (to overstate it somewhat) a "pompous twat". That was exactly my point -- that he surprisingly didn't come off as a pompous twat on the recent Letterman appearance, whereas frankly, I think Bono did. U2, by their own repeated admission, just aren't good at doing humor.
Sounds like some people here are just sick of Bono and what he actually says doesn't matter.
By the way, I'm not anything illegal.
Do you try to be amusing? Those were the only potential complications from the surgery, not the only potential complications from the injury.
Oh yes I do. I was talking about the surgery. There would be no complications from the injury because he had the surgery. Why have surgery if there'll still be complications from the injury. It was corrective surgery
Cactus Annie said:Oh yes I do. I was talking about the surgery. There would be no complications from the injury because he had the surgery. Why have surgery if there'll still be complications from the injury. It was corrective surgery
Really? No having complications from the injury because he had the surgery? Corrective?
You really have NO fucking clue about medical stuff eh?
I said that he can be pretentious in a lovable or horrible way, depending on your perspective. Obviously (or so I thought), from the perspective of a U2 fan like myself, it's a lovable quality -- his type of pretension doesn't bother me at all, and I quite admire it. But thousands of people are annoyed by it.
They're both a bit overweight. Other than that, they're near-perfect.
Yeah. Watching ER = medical knowledge.
I give up. This has no use. You're a mentally lost cause.