Search results

In legal terms, an "unpleasant disease" is one that is contagious.

I'm interested in internet law.

Individual states and countries specifically prohibit internet defamation, no matter what form it takes. Defamation consists of false and unprivileged publication which results in economic damages or personal distress. Financial loss is not necessary where the statement implies that a person is...

I can make no further comments at this time. However, my attorneys and I will be monitoring this message board quite closely. The wheels of justice do grind slowly, but they do grind. All will be revealed in due course.

P.S. I also asked my attorney if the Interference "it's official" message board room is above internet laws. He said, no.

Re: Re: jeff Did you know that in cases of internet libel/invasion of privacy that even if a post on a message board is inferred, suggested or posted in a "cryptic manner" that is also NOT a good defense? Ask your attorney. Just an FYI.

A person who wants to stab things because someone is happy is giving advice on "balance" (?) :rolleyes: :lmao:

Angela, YOU need bloody therapy! Did you know that in cases of internet slander/libel/invasion of privacy, even saying "I only told one person" is not a good defense. Thanks for giving me enough information to go to the media... and beyond.

just kidding ZeroDude... It's a mighty fine poem. I'll frame it and put it on my wall, which isn't a wall at all.

ZeroDude, Are you on drugs? :cool:

Originally posted by Doozer61 do you really think you could handle the doozer brain? :lol: All in good time, my pretty. All in good time! :p (pouring chocolate syrup) :hyper:

Cannibals!!!!! :tsk:

No offense taken. Just pointing out facts. I did think the goulish brain feast in my first U2 thread WAS Halloween related. It made sense to me. That's the only time of year I've ever seen brain feasting. :| (oh, the real answer in case anyone in cyberland or new U2 fans want to know is...

:wave: Welcome! I love King Crimson and ELP rulz after U2, that is.

I'm not debating, merely pointing out interference facts, quotes and poll stats regarding this issue of this forum stating NO U2 in it's rules. Two things I need to say before I go off to enjoy my weekend: No. 1) I thought the FIRST brain feast had to do with it being so close to Halloween...

Mr. Baw, The poll vote was to change the description: http://forum.interference.com/poll.php?s=&action=showresults&pollid=2053

or ....surrender my baby toes? ...eat carpet? :sad:

Sicy said (copy and paste from poll link above) The thing is.. it DOESNT say that U2 talk is not allowed here. It DOES say that everything and anything is allowed here... so I can understand that people may want to talk about U2 in here and not think they are doing anything wrong at all. Then I...

roger, copy that! I didn't know. It's says anything AND everything????? It should say anything AND everything, except U2. So, all newbies beware!!! Oh, I'm only a week old, so maybe I'll be forgiven? :sad: :hug:

fine, I'm not telling then. :grumpy:

No, and no.

Oh, it coulda been fun. Do ya wanna know the answer?

:no: (also prizes will not include brains, burnt popcorn or brindle).

:eyebrow: Okay, I'll start with the first U2 QUIZ question: What was Sunday Bloody Sunday originally called? (sorry, prizes not included) :no: The only rule is that if you ask a QUIZ question, you must know the answer. No cheating!

:(