Search results

This article is lacking in the analysis department. It's also inaccurate.

BAIT AND SWITCH.

worthy of Entertainment Weekly or TV Guide. This should have been written in bullet form, with just the song and film titles listed with years in parentheses. "Words" get in the way.

We should organize a petition to either the U2 organization or the iTunes Music Store to allow those tracks to be purchased individually. They really are only defeating themselves in this department, as I foresee all the tracks you can't get alone being put on bootleg CD compilations and showing...

D+

So? Where's the analysis?

The odds of that are about as likely as the Beatles touring with U2.

2 blocks away from me!

Why are there no direct-on shots of this? It appears that the photographer had free reign to take pictures, so why are they all on a slant or from the side? Psychologically, if someone is perpetrating a hoax like this, they are going to want to make the product look as amateurish as possible...

horse$hit, just like all the other info coming from this supposed "Universal South America."

hasn't the human race spent altogether too much time in the last five to ten years making lists? Rolling Stone, NME, Q, BBC, VH1 MTV, Muchmusic, and on and on; all of them have these "definitive greatest" lists. Hell, VH-1 is just one long clip-driven list show after another. Subjectivism kills...

That list looks more like a compilation of someone's personal favorites that didn't make it on the Best Of records. Don't believe it for one minute, or you've been had. A new mix of "Fire"? That's cute. I'm sure that the band and their people have forgotten that one was even recorded. The same...