Search results

I obviously disagree

I would understand an acoustic version here and there, showing how these songs can work in such format. I have no problem with that. But we still haven't heard a full electric version of EBW, and it just bothers me. I know it's just me, and it's just my perception of an acoustic format as the...

I just don't get this whole acoustic approach. I think they've released an awesome, fully electric, energetic and exciting great new record, and they are promoting it as the most laid back, quiet, reflexive thing. I just don't get it.

An album every 5 years is clearly NOT the way to go

Ok, I don't have the cd here but I can compare it to the filtered mp3 that suits today's standard mastering choices, and there's a difference... here it is... (Here I'm talking about volume levels and dynamic range, NOT audio quality)

Yep, it's all just weird... :P It's just the waveform is not like the regular cds releases these days, it's not clipped at all and far from pushing the db limits. AND it just is NOT the same waveform with the volume drecreased, it has natural peaks and doesn't seem clipped at all...

Well, in a digital medium it's all about resolution and sample rate, basically... But the cd is just a physical support and has its limitations: 16 bit and 44.100Hz. These files are 16 bit and 96.000Hz, a better quality than cd has. And apparently these files are not the same than the cd has...

Well, I opened the waveforms on an audio editor and they are different. Now I'm at work, but I'll try to upload an image of them... :)

Well, cds have a sampling rate of 44100Hz and this has 96000Hz, so it's a higher resolution, and it seems it has a wider dynamic range (NLOTH has -7db and this has -10db). That's why I ask where this comes from, as it's a different source, definitely NOT the cd release.

Yes it's different, it doesn't sound as loud but definitely "spacier" and better.

Does anybody know where this comes from? It's all over the torrent sites and it's like 631Mb. It has a wider dynamic range (-10db, the regular cd release being -7db), it's less compressed and "breathes" a lot more, and there's a clear difference with the response of the higher frequences, you...

13.aivan@gmail.com THANX A LOT!!!!!! :D

We still don't have the f******* record to have a f******* opinion about its cohesiveness...

A 38 Mb .rar? That's BS.

13.aivan@gmail.com THANX A LOT!!!!!!!

13.aivan@gmail.com THANX A LOT!!!!!!!

I'll be the happiest man alive... Pleeeeeeeeeaaaseeeeeee.... :) 13.aivan@gmail.com

I'd rather take Get On Your Boots (beach mix) than Unknown Caller (waves mix) as a first single... :) But... they're so different kind of songs that is hard to say one is "better" than another...

They've posted this message: A lo largo del día de hoy, publicaremos el especial del nuevo álbum de U2 tal y como venimos anunciando, de una manera mucho más vistosa. Se nos ha echado el tiempo encima porque el diseño del minisite lo requiere, pero esperamos tenerlo listo por la tarde. El...

Sorry to say I think U2spain.es will just make a microsite with a compilation of what we all know (or suspect) by now. Not a bit of official news.

Please make me a happy man... :) 13.aivan@gmail.com THANKS A LOT!!!!!

2 songs... Mysterious Ways + Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me.

I'd be eternally thankful for the studio version... :) 13.aivan@gmail.com Again, THANKS!!!

The ORIGINAL EDGE DEMO of Streets was 6/8, and it pissed off the band, but they changed it to 4/4 and that's what it is.

Standalone single, but a GREAT one. Maybe the poppiest U2 song EVER?