Is no one reading
Why am I still being presented arguments about what is or isn't presented in the Constitution
EDIT: will address my actual views on what defines free speech and whether Trump's EO is constitutional when I get a minute
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Someone pointed out how protests and deplatforming weren't violations of free speech.
I pointed out how, while they're not violations of the FIRST AMENDMENT'S RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH, they're anathema to the principle of free speech.
i.e. I don't think people should attempt to deplatform ideas...
The government has no role in saving Milo's book deal or saving him from censorship.
But when that SNL writer made some joke about Barron Trump and got canned, I fumed. I don't want to live in a society where, instead of combatting bad ideas with good ideas, or first mode of recourse is to...
But do you think that they think the government should have a hand in preventing this?
I guarantee you that the vast majority don't. Those who do shouldn't be listened to - they're missing the point, too.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
You know, I forgot you're living in Canada for a moment. Coming from an American, "your president" clearly implies that I support the man while you deride him.
If that wasn't your point, and instead you chose that word to simply mean this country's president, I sincerely apologize for...
It appears that, if they believe the argument is that a n y o n e complaining about Milo's governmental right to free speech is being violated, that they don't get the argument - yes.
I'm willing to discuss this further with you, because I think you're a smart guy, but only if we're going to...
How many times do we have to explain the difference between governmental restrictions of free speech and societal restrictions of free speech
Really, I can almost guarantee you that the people mocking free speech advocates are the only ones not getting this
Sent from my iPhone using U2...
I said I wouldn't discuss it anymore, but the fact that Milo is STILL to this day characterized as a White Nationalist is proof, to me, that there is misrepresentation afoot.
Things like this strike me as strange principles for a White Nationalist to put forth.
Will you concede that, even if...
Apology accepted, Dave. My condescension was out of line, too. I think we can both discuss this respectfully.
Now onto your question:
Well, yes actually. But quite frankly, you'll be hard pressed to find any non-call-to-action speech that I don't think qualifies as free speech. Are you now...
You somehow took my points and decided they implied I, too, support pedophilia. At that point, it becomes reasonable for me to assume a degree of condescension from me may be necessary in order for us to communicate.
Now onto your question: nope
Entirely possible, and if that's the case, I want to be corrected as soon as possible. I don't want to go around saying things that will embarrass me later on, of course not.
FYM has changed my mind on topics in my younger years - gay marriage, for instance. I am entirely open to changing my...
Nowhere did I say men have higher IQ's statistically - this is mathematically untrue, and I spoke very precisely on purpose. I stand by what I said, but I don't stand by what you're now claiming I said.
You needn't discuss it with me if you don't want to, but it seems reasonable for me to...