U2 Feedback

U2 Feedback (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/)
-   Free Your Mind Archive (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f290/)
-   -   Star Trek's 7 of 9 and Senator Kerry = Potential Problem (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f290/star-treks-7-of-9-and-senator-kerry-potential-problem-93311.html)

Dreadsox 06-29-2004 10:39 AM

Star Trek's 7 of 9 and Senator Kerry = Potential Problem
 
How does Star Trek 7 of 9

http://startrekvoyager.home.comcast.net/seven.jpe

have any influence of the election?

Well, Ms. Jeri Ryan's divorce was supposedly sealed. Unfortunately, for Ms. Ryan, her ex-husband decided to run for Senate. He was one of the Republican partys' rising stars. He made lots of money, became filthy rich, then decided to teach in the deapest of darkest inner city areas. Then he began his campaign for senate.

Well, in a political move, someone tried to open the divorce records. The Ryan's did not want it known that Mr. Ryan had been bringing Mrs. Ryan to sex clubs in order to get it on with strange men in front of Mr. Ryan and others. The Ryans wanted this sealed to prevent it from getting in the news because they have a child.

Well, in a politically damaging result, the judge ordered the records unsealed, citing public interest outways the young childs. The records were unsealed and Mr. Ryan, favored to win an important senate seat, was forced to withdraw from the race.

Mr. Kerry, because this potentially knocked off a front runner from the Republican party should be concerned. His divorce records are sealed. They are now going to be requested to be opened because of the ruling in the Ryan case.

What will we find in here? Will it knock Kerry out of the race? Is it true that Mrs. Kerry wanted a divorce because of the hardship of being a politicians wife? Or is there something damaging that has been kept from the public for all these years? Unfortunately, it was done to a Republican and I am betting it is going to happen to Kerry next. Time will tell if there is anything in there that will effect this race.

Klaus 06-29-2004 10:43 AM

Is there anything like respecting privacy even if the person is a celeb or politican?

AcrobatMan 06-29-2004 10:44 AM

can we make all KERRY and BUSH threads as one.. i am sure kerry and bush wont like that idea :eyebrow:

Dreadsox 06-29-2004 10:45 AM

The judge ruled that it is unfair to allow the wealthy to get their records sealed. It sets legal ground for Kerry's to be opened.

Salome 06-29-2004 10:57 AM

so because Mr. Ryan is a pervert
we also suspect that Kerry at least tried to sell his wife as a sex slave to some russian mafia bosses and that's why she wanted a divorce?

or am I missing the point of this touching story?

DrTeeth 06-29-2004 11:06 AM

Since Kerry is already a senator, maybe he can claim 'executive privilege'. That seems to be getting a lot of people out of trouble these days.

Angela Harlem 06-29-2004 11:14 AM

What the hell is wrong with this judge claiming that public interest outweighs the interests of their child?

And Kerry's potential skeletons in the closet is somehow more important? Who the hell cares!

Priorities are clearly in the right place with this one.
:rolleyes:

Not you Dread, whoever decided to originally link these 2 random divorces.

U2Kitten 06-29-2004 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Klaus
Is there anything like respecting privacy even if the person is a celeb or politican?

If it were Bush, would you care?

Dreadsox 06-29-2004 11:21 AM

Where did I imply that Senator Kerry was running around to sex clubs? the point is, it was done to a Republican Candidate, without any concern for his child, and he was forced out of the race because of it.

Senator Kerry has sealed divorce records. It is the window of opportunity to see if there is something that caused him to have them sealed.

Example: Senator Kerry was having difficulties with post traumatic stress, and it was too much for his wife to bear.

It does not have to do with sex necessarily.

It was done to a Republican and it is my contention that it will be attempted to be done to Senator Kerry.

Angela, I linked it myself, long before you heard it anywhere else. Political skeletons, or insight into the person running for office. This was opened up by people trying to take down a Republican, my big point is it was not necessary to do it this way, because it now opens up the same for potential democratic candidates. They won the battle at what price.

Dreadsox 06-29-2004 11:22 AM

My example is just that an example. No fact behind it....yet

nbcrusader 06-29-2004 11:24 AM

It appears as if the request for Ryan's records was short sighted. It creates a principle that people don't want universally applied.

I am sure requests have already been made for Kerry's records. With the Ryan precedent, it is hard to argue on principle why Kerry's records should be treated differently.

jay canseco 06-29-2004 11:28 AM

I knew Hillary was going to run for president this time. /sarcasm

Angela Harlem 06-29-2004 11:29 AM

His marriage is not really anyone's business. A divorce even less so.

Dont you find it a little stomach churning that some people out there want to know details of someone's personal life? Is nothing sacred? Whatever happened in his marriage would have absolutely no consequence on his ability to run your country. Though I question whether he can, his marriage is not anyone's business.

Angela Harlem 06-29-2004 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nbcrusader
It appears as if the request for Ryan's records was short sighted. It creates a principle that people don't want universally applied.

I am sure requests have already been made for Kerry's records. With the Ryan precedent, it is hard to argue on principle why Kerry's records should be treated differently.

The precedent was wrong. That divorce should never have been unsealed and the judge should have some explaining to do. Pity it wont happen.

Dreadsox 06-29-2004 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nbcrusader
It appears as if the request for Ryan's records was short sighted. It creates a principle that people don't want universally applied.

I am sure requests have already been made for Kerry's records. With the Ryan precedent, it is hard to argue on principle why Kerry's records should be treated differently.

You have said it better than I you lawyer you!:madspit:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com