U2 Feedback

U2 Feedback (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/)
-   Free Your Mind Archive (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f290/)
-   -   U.S. Terrorism Policy Spawns Steady Staff Exodus (http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f290/u-s-terrorism-policy-spawns-steady-staff-exodus-90355.html)

MrBrau1 04-07-2004 05:32 PM

U.S. Terrorism Policy Spawns Steady Staff Exodus
 
U.S. Terrorism Policy Spawns Steady Staff Exodus
By Caroline Drees

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has faced a steady exodus of counterterrorism officials, many disappointed by a preoccupation with Iraq they said undermined the U.S. fight against terrorism.

Former counterterrorism officials said at least half a dozen have left the White House Office for Combating Terrorism or related agencies in frustration in the 2 1/2 years since the attacks.

Some also left because they felt President Bush had sidelined his counterterrorism experts and paid almost exclusive heed to the vice president, the defense secretary and other Cabinet members in planning the "war on terror," former counterterrorism officials said.
"I'm kind of hoping for regime change," one official who quit told Reuters.

The administration's handling of the battle against terrorism is a key issue for the presidency, and could be key to Bush's re-election effort.
Similar charges were made by Bush's former counterterrorism czar, Richard Clarke, who told the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that the administration ignored the al Qaeda threat beforehand and was fixated on Iraq afterward. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice testifies before the 9/11 panel on Thursday.

"Iraq has been a distraction from the whole counterterrorism effort," said the former official, adding the policy had frustrated many in the White House anti-terrorism office, about two-thirds of whom have left and been replaced since Sept. 11.

The administration vehemently denies the accusations, and says it is making strong progress in the global war on terror.



HIGH TURNOVER

Roger Cressey, who served under Clarke in the White House counterterrorism office, said: "Dick accurately reflects the frustration of many in the counterterrorism community in getting the new administration to take the al Qaeda issue seriously."

Cressey left the office in November 2001, when he became chief of staff of the White House's cybersecurity office until September 2002.
The attrition among all levels of the Office for Combating Terrorism began shortly after the attacks and continued into this year. At least eight officials in the office -- which numbers a dozen people -- have left and been replaced since 9/11. Several of the officials were contacted by Reuters.

The office has been run by four different people since the attacks, and at least three have held the No. 2 slot. "There has been excessively high turnover in the Office for Combating Terrorism," said Flynt Leverett, who served on the White House National Security Council for about a year until March 2003 and is now a fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank.

"If you take the (White House) counterterrorism and Middle East offices, you've got about a dozen people ... who came to this administration wanting to work on these important issues and left after a year or often less because they just don't think that this administration is dealing seriously with the issues that matter," he said.

Rand Beers, a former No. 2 in the office who quit last year over the administration's handling of the war on terrorism, told Reuters the turnover had been "unusually high" since the hijacked airliner attacks in New York and Washington.

"And one of the reasons is frustration with the way counterterrorism policy has been conducted, including the focus on Iraq," said Beers, who now serves as a foreign policy adviser for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, who hopes to unseat Bush in November.

The White House denied there had been unusually high turnover, saying staff tended to be on limited assignments from other federal agencies. A senior administration official said it was "absolutely untrue" Iraq was diverting attention from overall counterterrorism efforts.

Another official said it was wrong to link all the numerous departures to policy concerns over Iraq.
Several current and former officials said burn out from job stress also contributed to high turnover in the office, as did frustration among some staff about the limits of their influence over policymaking in general. Many National Security Council staffers only stay 18 months to two years.
One current counterterrorism official said while the Iraq campaign had been a "huge resource drain," this held true for all major events that compete for scarce resources.

"There's a problem of too few counterterrorism staffers to begin with ... and with the focus on any big issue like Iraq, it is a distraction from the overall counterterrorism effort," the official said.


Bush has the answers. He doesn't need experts to advise him. Jesus Christ will guide him.

Dreadsox 04-07-2004 05:56 PM

:banghead:

verte76 04-07-2004 06:05 PM

:censored: :censored: :censored: :censored: :censored: :censored: :censored: :censored: :censored:

STING2 04-07-2004 06:32 PM

The vast majority of the military units in Iraq currently would not be involved in any hunt for Al Quada in the first place.

I'm sorry these officials think that the United States only faces one type of threat to its security. The President recognizes all the threats to US security and knows how to set appropriate policy to deal with all these threats.

nbcrusader 04-07-2004 07:05 PM

You've got to leave to write your book

MrBrau1 04-07-2004 08:08 PM

It seems 1/2 the people who work w/ Bush wind up leaving one way or another, and disagreeing w/ his policy.

verte76 04-08-2004 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrBrau1
It seems 1/2 the people who work w/ Bush wind up leaving one way or another, and disagreeing w/ his policy.
There have been plenty of them. But then there is always alot of disagreement in politics.

melon 04-20-2004 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by STING2
I'm sorry these officials think that the United States only faces one type of threat to its security. The President recognizes all the threats to US security and knows how to set appropriate policy to deal with all these threats.
Haha...good one. Too bad the left has generally been correct on everything involving Iraq, starting from the lack of WMDs to Iraq's subsequent rebelliousness following the "end" of Gulf War II.

Maybe Bush should stop surrounding himself with PNAC reactionaries and find someone who isn't in this to fulfill some kind of pre-determined agenda, whether to avenge Bush I's failures in Gulf War I or to fulfill some kind of apocalyptic Biblical prophesy that rolls around their thick skulls?

Melon

STING2 04-20-2004 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by melon


Haha...good one. Too bad the left has generally been correct on everything involving Iraq, starting from the lack of WMDs to Iraq's subsequent rebelliousness following the "end" of Gulf War II.

Maybe Bush should stop surrounding himself with PNAC reactionaries and find someone who isn't in this to fulfill some kind of pre-determined agenda, whether to avenge Bush I's failures in Gulf War I or to fulfill some kind of apocalyptic Biblical prophesy that rolls around their thick skulls?

Melon

Ahh yes, the wonderful "left" and their policy towards Saddam. It was the "Left" that claimed that Sanctions would get Saddam out of Kuwait in 1990/1991. It was the "Left" that claimed that the US and Coalition would lose 50,000 people in retaking Kuwait from Saddam.

Iraq is a country of 25 million people, but apparently there are those that think a few thousand TERRORIST speak for them all.

The United States has had a policy of INSURING the disarmament of Saddam over the past 12 years. The methods used prior to the invasion of Iraq (by the Bush administration) FAILED to insure that Saddam was disarmed.

It is a Republican administration not a Democratic administration that has achieved the disarmament of Saddam and removed him from power. The Democrats failed to do either.

I think the "Left" should save their wild conspiracy theories for Oliver Stone.

melon 04-20-2004 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by STING2
I think the "Left" should save their wild conspiracy theories for Oliver Stone.
And the "Right" should save their agitprop for Leonid Brezhnev.

Melon

TylerDurden 04-21-2004 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by STING2

Iraq is a country of 25 million people, but apparently there are those that think a few thousand TERRORIST speak for them all.

You would call the uprising problems in Iraq at the moment a terrorist problem?!?

TylerDurden 04-21-2004 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by STING2
The President recognizes all the threats to US security and knows how to set appropriate policy to deal with all these threats.
:laugh:

melon 04-21-2004 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TylerDurden


You would call the uprising problems in Iraq at the moment a terrorist problem?!?

"Terrorism" is the new "Red Scare." So, rather than blaming all the evils of the world on "communists," now it is time to blame all the evils of the world on "terrorists." It is so easy to oversimplify conflicts and dehumanize your opponents this way.

Melon

BVS 04-21-2004 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by melon


"Terrorism" is the new "Red Scare." So, rather than blaming all the evils of the world on "communists," now it is time to blame all the evils of the world on "terrorists." It is so easy to oversimplify conflicts and dehumanize your opponents this way.

Melon

I'm glad someone said this, I thought I was the only one who thought this.

nbcrusader 04-21-2004 11:36 AM

True, we spend too much time trying to get a label to fit or tossing out the easiest label.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com