Continue from previous thread:
http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f314/2015-u2-tour-general-discussion-thread-vi-218576.html
http://www.u2interference.com/forums/f314/2015-u2-tour-general-discussion-thread-vi-218576.html
Holy shit this is brilliant. Can we have a Rotisserie baseball style draft where we each have 24 song slots and a certain amount of dollars to spend on tickets and we bid on songs? Someone make this happen.
A couple months back we did a regular draft format where you could only pick a song after 3 other people posted. Then we took all our picks and created a setlist it was a fun exercise. It's too tough to do a Snake Draft unless everybody agreed on a set time to do it.
This time I just want to see the 'market/stock price' for a song live based on everybody's opinion. If the starting point is IWF = $10 (I've seen it at every show I have attended). Here are my prices for live tracks based on the price.
Vertigo = $15
Stuck in a Moment = $1
Bad = $55
Reach Around = $90
Mofo = $125
God Part II = $190
Acrobat = $450
Grace = $0.13
Could you guys make a separate thread for U2 fantasy setlist or whatever? It's kind of a cool concept, but give it its own thread.
That said, it's still, easily, the most universally beloved U2 album since 1992.
That's not particularly an achievement, given either company or context or both.
A couple months back we did a regular draft format where you could only pick a song after 3 other people posted. Then we took all our picks and created a setlist it was a fun exercise. It's too tough to do a Snake Draft unless everybody agreed on a set time to do it.
This time I just want to see the 'market/stock price' for a song live based on everybody's opinion. If the starting point is IWF = $10 (I've seen it at every show I have attended). Here are my prices for live tracks based on the price.
Vertigo = $15
Stuck in a Moment = $1
Bad = $55
Reach Around = $90
Mofo = $125
God Part II = $190
Acrobat = $450
Grace = $0.13
I'd cash out my 401K for ASOH, Discotheque, Mofo and Gone.
That's pretty harsh. If you like it or not is up to you, an I agree that it's a long way from the more esoteric musings of Zooropa, but to dismiss a massively popular band in their 40s putting out a popular, successful, awarded album and even more successful tour and at least one if not two classic songs on an album that, nearly a year later, weirdly addressed mass death on the streets of NYC and their willingness to continue to tour when others (Janet Jackson) wouldn't doesn't qualify as an achievement, what does?
Between commercial, critical and touring... Yea, U2 were easily the biggest band in the world once again from the release of Beautiful Day through the Vertigo tour.
yea, I'm not sure how people can refute this.
Between commercial, critical and touring... Yea, U2 were easily the biggest band in the world once again from the release of Beautiful Day through the Vertigo tour.
Nice...i wonder if The Edge has the moves like jagger, moves like jagger.
That line comes solely from that Bono comment about reapplying for the top job.
I don't think U2 were anywhere near the "best" back then (I remember listening to Kid A that same month and thinking "Fuck, U2 have really regressed..."), but they were certainly the biggest. They got the soccer moms and the AARP members and all the college kids who hated nu metal flocking to their banner. They presented themselves as fun and dumb and accessible. And it worked. Kudos to them.
Dumb? Really? Songs about death and Burma and religious hypocrisy and orgasm-as-epiphany and buying real estate in New York? That's dumb?